Applying Legal Precedents Against COVID Mandates

Exposing the Misinformed Consent of Medical Mutilation

The Media-Planted Propaganda of the CIC

The State of the Union of Censorship in America

Who Controls the WHO?

The CMB and The Omnipresent Threat of Usurpation

Protecting Free Speech and Our Nation’s ChildrenWashington, DC&nbsp;&nbsp;- Tuesday December 17, 2024On December 13, 2024, Dr. Simone Gold and the AFLDS legal team filed an&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1734471609/Chilesv_Salazar_AFLDS_Amici_Brief_d79921f9b2.pdf">amici curiae brief</a> with the Supreme Court of the United States, in support of the Petitioner in&nbsp;Chiles v. Salazar. The Petitioner (Kaley Chiles) is suing the Respondents over Colorado’s&nbsp;<a href="https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&amp;crid=7e0b7996-78d9-459c-8d5c-65962b6b26f0&amp;nodeid=AAMAAHAAKAADAAC&amp;nodepath=%2FROOT%2FAAM%2FAAMAAH%2FAAMAAHAAK%2FAAMAAHAAKAAD%2FAAMAAHAAKAADAAC&amp;level=5&amp;haschildren=&amp;populated=false&amp;title=12-245-202.+Definitions.&amp;config=014FJAAyNGJkY2Y4Zi1mNjgyLTRkN2YtYmE4OS03NTYzNzYzOTg0OGEKAFBvZENhdGFsb2d592qv2Kywlf8caKqYROP5&amp;pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A65KM-2JS3-CGX8-00VX-00008-00&amp;ecomp=6gf59kk&amp;prid=82b21010-69bc-4a7d-ae4a-b2d621f1dcb9">“Counseling Censorship Law”</a> which violates her free speech rights by prohibiting licensed counselors from engaging in any conversation with minor patients that does not steer them in the direction of “gender-affirming care.” By submitting a petition for&nbsp;<a href="https://adflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/chiles-v-salazar-2024-11-08-scotus-cert-petition.pdf">writ of certiorari</a> to SCOTUS, the Petitioner is asking the High Court to hear her case and reverse the&nbsp;<a href="https://dm1l19z832j5m.cloudfront.net/2024-09/Chiles-v-Salazar-2024-09-12-Appellate-Ruling.pdf">decision</a> of the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals which upheld the state’s law - denying her declaratory and injunctive relief.America’s Frontline Doctors contends that Colorado’s “prohibited speech” law blatantly violates the First Amendment and severely compromises the patient-counselor relationship. The Tenth Circuit reasoned that a counseling session transforms speech into conduct and conduct is not protected by the First Amendment, finding instead that the discussion of all treatment options was “incidental speech.” However, merely labeling protected free speech as “conduct” does not change its character as free speech nor does it turn free speech into unprotected “incidental speech.”Further, the state’s law exhibits unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination by only allowing speech that affirms a child’s sexual orientation or gender identity while prohibiting alternative treatments. Viewpoint discrimination is when the government prohibits or disfavors one type of speech (a particular viewpoint) while permitting another type of speech (a different viewpoint), and is flagrantly illegal in the United States of America. The Petitioner must be free to engage in protected and confidential speech with her clients that is in the best interests of Colorado’s minor children. The medical harms of “gender-affirming care” (aka medical mutilation) are&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1720808982/Medical_Mutilation_White_Paper_1804e8ca1a.pdf">well documented</a> and growing. Prohibiting discussions of ALL viable treatment options available to patients breaches ethical duties of honesty and transparency owed by counselors to their patients and arguably constitutes professional malpractice.&nbsp;AFLDS attorney David Dalia states, “Research has shown that somewhere between 85 - 98% of children who are experiencing confusion about their biological sex will outgrow their confusion within two years. They become normal, young, unmutilated adults. Twenty-one American states, numerous European countries, and most recently the U.K., have all banned puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and ‘gender reassignment’ surgeries for minor children due to the perceived lack of benefit. Given these undisputed facts, Colorado’s unconstitutional restriction on therapeutic speech with children can be seen as unethical, irrational, cruel, and possibly criminal genital mutilation and child abuse. We sincerely hope that the Supreme Court rejects this misguided transgender ideology.”&nbsp;AFLDS Founder and President Dr. Simone Gold added, “By only allowing speech that affirms a radical transgender ideology while rejecting that which affirms reality-based biology, the government is choosing sides. Colorado’s law directs vulnerable children down a tragically predictable path of sterility and lifelong health complications. If trapping 100% of children into ‘gender-affirming care’ was the sole correct path, the Nation would not be hearing from countless detransitioners alleging that they were not informed of the biological facts before ‘consenting’ to medical mutilation.”Recognizing that this pivotal case has the potential to set a precedent for countless healthcare professionals across the country being forced to comply with a radical gender ideology to the detriment of their patients, AFLDS is calling on SCOTUS to grant the Petitioner's writ of certiorari.Stay tuned - We will keep you updated on this critical case and our efforts to end the medical mutilation of children.&nbsp;# # #About AFLDSWe are the Nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.org Media Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director |&nbsp;<a href="mailto:Media@AFLDS.org">Media@AFLDS.org</a> &nbsp;

AFLDS Files Amici Curiae Brief in Chiles v. Salazar

Taking A Stand to Protect Free SpeechNew Orleans, LA.&nbsp;- December 2, 2024On November 26, 2024, Dr. Simone Gold and the AFLDS legal team filed an&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1733251388/Kennedyv_Biden_AFLDS_Amici_Brief_Official_Stamped_Version_228e2ec477.pdf">amici curiae&nbsp;brief&nbsp;</a>with the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the Plaintiffs-Appellees (Plaintiffs) in&nbsp;Kennedy v. Biden. The Plaintiffs are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from the ongoing COVID-19 censorship at the hands of the Biden administration, the Defendants-Appellants (Defendants). By submitting an&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1733251389/Kennedyv_Biden_En_Banc_And_Panel_Ruling_8ceab29e15.pdf">en banc rehearing petition</a> to the Fifth Circuit, the Plaintiffs are requesting that the full appeals court reconsider their case.Earlier this year, US District Court Judge Terry A. Doughty&nbsp;<a href="https://casetext.com/case/kennedy-v-biden-4/">ruled</a> that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Children’s Health Defense have standing for their First Amendment direct censorship claims against the Defendants. A Fifth Circuit three-judge panel later&nbsp;<a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/24-30252/24-30252-2024-11-04.html">reversed</a> the lower court’s ruling, rejecting the Plaintiffs’ claims that allowing the ongoing censorship to continue will cause more human harm. Additionally, the panel held that Plaintiffs were deprived of all legal standing because the government allegedly halted its censorship of the Plaintiffs (voluntary cessation), and vacated the trial court’s preliminary injunction.&nbsp;America’s Frontline Doctors contend that the Fifth Circuit panel adopted an overly restrictive interpretation of legal standing and concurs with the Plaintiffs’ claims. Medical censorship kills. ”Voluntary cessation” does not remove “standing” under the jurisprudence (theory of law). This holding sets a precedent that would allow government actors to destroy any and all constitutional rights at will under the simple pretense of temporary compliance. Further, this illegal behavior has not ceased and is likely to recur.AFLDS attorney David Dalia states, “Trial judge Terry A. Doughty delivered a well-reasoned opinion based on the evidence. The Fifth Circuit’s dangerous and deeply erroneous ruling is contrary to the prevailing jurisprudence. RFK Jr. and Children’s Health Defense were some of the worst victims of the government’s ongoing illegal censorship campaign. To deny these injured Plaintiffs standing is analogous to denying standing to a gunshot victim, as long as his assailant promises never to do it again! This is of course absurd. The&nbsp;en banc Fifth Circuit should swiftly correct this very grievous error.”AFLDS Founder and President Dr. Simone Gold added, “The dangerous precedent at stake in this lawsuit mirrors the historic&nbsp;Murthy v. Missouri case decided by SCOTUS earlier this year. Tragically, the High Court lacked the wisdom to strike down the government’s weaponized attack on free speech. As many know, AFLDS and I were also targets of the Biden administration as part of the so-called ‘Disinformation Dozen.’ The government’s suppression of free speech must not be allowed to continue. We remain hopeful that the Fifth Circuit has the courage to take the necessary action to correct this injustice by granting the Plaintiffs’ petition.”&nbsp;America’s Frontline Doctors maintains that the Defendants engaged in unconstitutional, dangerous and criminal activity by suppressing the Plaintiffs’ free speech during the COVID-19 pandemic. This illegal government overreach compromised the First Amendment rights and safety of millions of Americans. By censoring truthful and accurate medical information, the Defendants caused thousands of avoidable deaths - depriving millions of valuable information that could have helped them formulate personal medical decisions based upon fully informed consent.These egregious censorship tactics have also been weaponized to control other narratives such as election integrity, medical mutilation and climate change. Stay tuned - We will keep you updated on this pivotal free speech case and our efforts to end the tyranny of weaponized censorship.&nbsp;# # #About AFLDSWe are the Nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.orgMedia Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director |&nbsp;<a href="mailto:Media@AFLDS.org">Media@AFLDS.org</a> &nbsp;

AFLDS Files Amici Curiae Brief in Kennedy v. Biden

Standing Against the Medical Mutilation of ChildrenWashington, DC – October 17, 2024On October 15, 2024, Dr. Simone Gold and the AFLDS legal team filed a bold&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1729195331/20241015122545084_23-477_Amici_Brief_elbi8q.pdf">amici curiae brief</a> with the Supreme Court of the United States, in support of the Respondents in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/327730/20241008130915048_23-477%20Respondents%20Brief.pdf">United States v. Skrmetti</a>&nbsp;(formerly&nbsp;L.W. v. Skrmetti). The Respondents are being sued by the Biden-Harris administration over&nbsp;<a href="https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=SB0001&amp;utm_source=substack&amp;utm_medium=email">SB1</a>, Tennessee’s law that prohibits “gender-affirming care” for minors. By submitting our&nbsp;amici curiae brief, AFLDS joins the Respondents in calling for SCOTUS to affirm the judgment of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. In short, we are asking the High Court to allow the state of Tennessee to enforce its own law which protects the health and safety of children by prohibiting these dangerous interventions.The government (Petitioner) argues that the state’s law discriminates on the basis of sex, violating the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. However, simply assessing the lines drawn by SB1 reveals the absence of any sex-based classification. The law creates two groups: (1) minors seeking to use puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for gender transition, and (2) minors seeking to use puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for other medical purposes. Both groups include both sexes, defeating the government’s equal protection argument.AFLDS maintains that minors are incapable of giving true and legal&nbsp;<a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/about-us/issue-briefs/exposing-the-misinformed-consent-of-medical-mutilation">informed consent</a> to medical mutilation. Despite the&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1720808982/Medical_Mutilation_White_Paper_1804e8ca1a.pdf?updated_at=2024-07-12T18:29:43.454Z">overwhelming evidence</a> that these “treatments” result in permanent disfigurement, ushering children into lifelong medical misery instead of compassionate care, doctors who once took an oath to “do no harm” are now performing “gender-affirming” interventions on children. As a result, the lives of countless children and their families are being destroyed at the hands of a multi-billion-dollar industry that prioritizes profits over health. The rapid expansion of the Medical Mutilation Industry represents a tremendous threat to our national identity, security and future. To address this growing threat, our lawmakers must take critical action by passing legislation that protects the Nation’s children and holds rogue doctors accountable for their crimes against humanity.It is clear that SB1 is a proper exercise of the police power of the State of Tennessee to regulate these dangerous interventions to protect Tennessee minors from the tragically predictable consequences of medical mutilation. This exercise of state police power is similar to the longstanding and accepted state regulation of abortions, female genital mutilations, psychosurgery, shock treatments, lobotomies, child sterilizations, assisted suicides, euthanasia and even tattoos. As the medical harms of these “treatments” are well documented, state regulation is not only completely lawful and appropriate, it is mandatory.AFLDS Attorney David Dalia states, “There’s an alarming likelihood that these minor children will bitterly regret these mutilations. Studies show that as many as 85% of children grow out of gender dysphoria! As I learned the reality of ‘gender-affirming care,’ I became appalled. These surgeries and treatments are&nbsp; grotesque, and lead to a lifetime of medications, medical complications, repeat surgeries and regret. Surgeon Dr. Eithan Haim said: ‘they are offering a physiological solution to a psychological problem.’ States routinely regulate other dangerous surgeries and treatments like psychosurgery, child sterilizations, genital mutilations and euthanasia. I urge everyone to study the grisly facts and research about the medical mutilation of minors, as exposed by Tennessee, Alabama, twenty two other states, America’s Frontline Doctors, and 51&nbsp;amici curiae groups all supporting the State of Tennessee in the Skrmetti case. Tennessee’s lawful exercise of its police power to protect minor children from lifetime mutilations should be strongly affirmed. The age of majority should be required for any such drastic decisions.”AFLDS Founder and President Dr. Simone Gold added, “Our laws on the books for informed consent are very clear and must be enforced. Children cannot give informed consent. This responsibility has been entrusted to the parent. However, there is no common law precedent that allows someone to consent to the medical mutilation of another. No third party, not parent nor government, can empower a minor to consent to medical mutilation. All of the childhood procedures happening right now are illegal because no person can legally grant ‘permission’ to cause lifelong health complications and sterility for another person.”&nbsp;This historic case will be argued in front of the Supreme Court in the coming months. AFLDS recognizes that if SCOTUS sides with the federal government and strikes down Tennessee's law, a precedent will be set that will endanger the lives of countless young Americans. The High Court must not lose sight of what is at stake: the health and safety of our Nation’s children.&nbsp;Stay tuned - We will keep you updated on the status of this case and our efforts to end the medical mutilation of children.&nbsp;&nbsp;# # #About AFLDSWe are the Nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.org Media Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director |&nbsp;<a href="mailto:Media@AFLDS.org">Media@AFLDS.org</a> &nbsp;

AFLDS Files Amici Curiae Brief in United States v. Skrmetti

A Call to Action for All AmericansNaples, FL. - October 16, 2024On Sunday October 6, 2024, AFLDS proudly premiered “What is a Doctor?” at New Beginnings Church in Bedford, Texas. Sponsored by Moms for America and Patriot Mobile, this landmark event marked the launch of AFLDS’ campaign to screen this groundbreaking documentary across the Nation.&nbsp;<a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/whatisadoctor">What is a Doctor?</a> reveals the disturbing agenda behind the Medical Mutilation Industry and the tragic impact of the mislabeled "gender-affirming care" on vulnerable children. This powerful film was made by doctors who refuse to be silent as the lives of countless children and their families are destroyed. Please read our previous&nbsp;<a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/about-us/press-releases/aflds-announces-premiere-of-what-is-a-doctor">press release</a> to learn more.&nbsp;The screening was followed by an insightful discussion with the cast of the film. Dr. Simone Gold was joined by Dr. Miriam Grossman, Dr. Melanie Crites-Bachert, Dr. Eithan Haim and Dr. Scott Jensen.During the discussion, Dr. Grossman praised the movie, declaring “This film is a home run. Every family needs to understand - no one is immune from this insanity. To the contrary - we are all vulnerable. We have to wake up. And this film, I believe, will wake people up.”&nbsp;Commenting on the critical question that the film poses, Dr. Haim stated, "Throughout our history, stories told about doctors illustrated their miraculous power to heal. But now, it is not the patients who are sick but the doctors - that disease being the pathological metastasis of a mind virus that destroys our society's most innocent and pure, the children. By asking the question in the movie's title, doctors can stem the bleeding, begin extraction of the cancer, and take the first step to healing.“In a continuing effort to Drain the Science Swamp, Dr. Gold and AFLDS are calling on all Americans to be the voice for the most vulnerable among us and take a stand to protect our children. We encourage everyone to share the film’s&nbsp;<a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/whatisadoctor">website</a> where you can:<ul><li>Learn more about the film and the cast</li><li>Sign up to get notified when a showing is playing in your area</li><li>Sign up to host a showing in your city</li><li>Donate to support the movie</li></ul>AFLDS is blowing the whistle on rogue doctors who have forsaken their oath to “do no harm” and we are calling on the American people to join us. Together, we will fight back against the Medical Mutilation Industry and expose the truth. United, we resolve to fiercely protect our children in order to preserve their innocence and future.# # #About AFLDSWe are the Nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.orgMedia Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director |&nbsp;<a href="mailto:Media@AFLDS.org">Media@AFLDS.org</a> &nbsp;

AFLDS Premieres “What is a Doctor?”

A Precedent-Setting Case for Medical FreedomWashington, DC. - September 18, 2024On September 16, 2024, Dr. Simone Gold and the AFLDS legal team vigilantly filed an&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1726681379/AFLDS_Amici_Brief_Johnson_v_Kotek_b11c1e7699.pdf">amici curiae brief</a> with the Supreme Court of the United States, in support of the Petitioners in<a href="https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2024/02/23/22-35624.pdf">&nbsp;Johnson et al. v. Kotek, et al.</a> (formerly&nbsp;Johnson v. Brown). The Petitioners are seeking damages resulting from unconstitutional and illegal COVID-19 vaccine mandates. By submitting a petition for&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-173/322395/20240813193006226_Johnson%20v%20Kotek%20Petition.pdf">writ of certiorari</a> to SCOTUS, the Petitioners are asking the High Court to hear their case and reverse the decision of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals which dismissed their claims for damages.&nbsp;In 2021, Oregon’s Governor Kate Brown issued COVID-19 vaccine mandates for all healthcare workers, school employees and state employees.&nbsp;<a href="https://casetext.com/case/johnson-v-brown-87">Johnson v. Brown</a> sought to establish that the State’s mandate was unconstitutional and in violation of federal law. The Plaintiffs in&nbsp;Johnson assert that in the context of the experimental COVID “vaccine”, their right to refuse unwanted medication is determined by the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejm199711133372006">Nuremberg Code</a>, which requires informed consent without any element of duress. The district court dismissed the case, and the Ninth Circuit refused to address the merits of the constitutional issue, finding instead that the Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity. Because the lower courts have failed to vindicate the Petitioners’ right (and that of millions of Americans) to refuse orders that they be injected with experimental drugs, they are urging SCOTUS to grant a writ of certiorari and hear their case.&nbsp;AFLDS holds the position that these experimental mRNA injections are not “vaccines”, because they do not prevent infection or transmission, and they are neither&nbsp;safe, nor&nbsp;effective. The COVID shots are personal medical treatments only. This is backed by a tremendous amount of scientific research and evidence showing a horrific safety profile with millions of documented adverse side effects including death.&nbsp;The Defendants willfully violated numerous well-established constitutional principles, federal statutes, federal regulations, and the Nuremberg Code by illegally mandating dangerous experimental mRNA drugs via executive decree under the coercive threat of job termination. This deprives the Defendants of qualified immunity from the Plaintiffs’ claims for damages.As stated by AFLDS’ affiliate attorney, David Dalia, “After all, how can anyone ‘mandate’ anything that might kill you? It is self-evident that any decision by non-doctors to ‘mandate’ a dangerous experimental personal medical treatment under the coercive threat of the loss of one’s employment&nbsp; is irrational, and lacks any legitimate state purpose whatsoever. Additionally, the treatment does not prevent infection or transmission, and has severe side effects including death. The mandate violates numerous well-established laws including the constitutional right to refuse medical treatment, the right of bodily integrity, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3, 21 C.F.R. §50:25, the Nuremberg Code, and many others. These illegal and dangerous ‘medical mandates’ must cease."AFLDS Founder and President Dr. Gold added, “Since 2020, I have repeatedly argued that mandates of the&nbsp; COVID injections violate our constitutional rights. The&nbsp;only&nbsp;basis upon which our government can even consider&nbsp;mandating any medication is to ‘prevent the transmission of a communicable disease.’ From the moment Pfizer and Moderna submitted their applications to the FDA, and then through years of real-time data, everyone knows they do not stop transmission. This finding of fact was recently upheld by the Ninth Circuit. As these shots never met the historical definition of a vaccine by preventing transmission of the disease, they cannot be mandated. In addition, they were released in violation of the key element of the emergency authorization act, which is that no other treatment be available.”AFLDS recognizes that this critical case has the potential to set a precedent for countless Americans who were wrongly coerced, threatened and damaged by tyrannical vaccine mandates. This is why we are calling on SCOTUS to grant the Petitioners’ writ of certiorari and correct the miscarriage of justice conducted by the lower courts.# # #About AFLDSWe are the Nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.orgMedia Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director |&nbsp;<a href="mailto:Media@AFLDS.org">Media@AFLDS.org</a> &nbsp;

AFLDS Files Amici Curiae Brief in Johnson v. Kotek

Reexamining the Hippocratic OathNaples, FL.&nbsp;&nbsp;– September 16, 2024. AFLDS is proud to announce the premiere of the documentary that will expose the radical agenda of the Medical Mutilation Industry and challenge audiences to ask themselves a very important question - What is a doctor?On Sunday, October 6, 2024, AFLDS will introduce their eye-opening film live in Dallas, TX. Dr. Simone Gold will be joined by Dr. Miriam Grossman, Dr. Melanie Crites-Bachert, Dr. Eithan Haim and Dr. Scott Jensen for an insightful discussion following the screening of the movie. This must-see event will be hosted by Moms for America and Patriot Mobile.&nbsp;In a post-COVID world, it has become apparent that many have lost faith and confidence in our once sacred medical institutions. The pandemic pulled back the curtain on the Medical Industrial Complex, revealing the unfortunate truth that the medical industry has been severely compromised. This has been made more evident by the aggressive expansion of so-called “gender-affirming care” which is now championed by most woke medical associations and doctors as the new&nbsp;standard of care for children struggling with gender dysphoria. Despite the fact that the medical harms of these&nbsp;treatments are&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1720808982/Medical_Mutilation_White_Paper_1804e8ca1a.pdf?updated_at=2024-07-12T18:29:43.454Z">well documented</a> and growing, doctors who once took an oath to “do no harm,” are now performing these procedures on minors who are incapable of giving informed consent to medical mutilation. As a result, an untold number of children are being&nbsp; permanently disfigured and suffering from lifelong health complications - financing a multi-billion-dollar industry that puts profits over patient well-being.&nbsp;The hostile takeover of the health profession by radical gender activists has cast a dark shadow over the field of medicine, leading doctors to reexamine what it means to wear a white coat and take the Hippocratic Oath. The public is left wondering how we got to this point and if they will ever be able to trust first world medicine again. Many are asking themselves, what is a doctor? To address this question in detail, AFLDS has gathered some of the leading voices in medicine. Together, we will take a deeper look at this agenda that poses a tremendous threat to our national identity, security and future.&nbsp;<a href="https://aflds.org/what-is-a-doctor">What is a Doctor</a>? is AFLDS’ response to a sickness that has corrupted our health industry. This film was made by doctors who refuse to be silent as the lives of countless children and their families are destroyed at the hands of the Medical Mutilation Industry.&nbsp;Visit&nbsp;<a href="https://aflds.org/what-is-a-doctor">What is a Doctor</a>? for information on viewing or hosting a showing.# # #About AFLDSWe are the Nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.org &nbsp;Media Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director |&nbsp;<a href="mailto:Media@AFLDS.org">Media@AFLDS.org</a> &nbsp;

Protecting your Medical
Freedom and Civil Liberties

Who We Are

Press Releases