The Media-Planted Propaganda of the CIC

The State of the Union of Censorship in America

Who Controls the WHO?

The CMB and The Omnipresent Threat of Usurpation

Dr. Gold Emerges Victorious in Landmark Free Speech Case

The California Medical Board: Rogue Actors in a Broken Justice System

Politically Persecuted J6 Defendants Advance Toward JusticeWashington, DC. – June 28, 2024.&nbsp;The High Court’s decision has brought down the entire house of cards that is the selective prosecution of the J6 defendants by the DOJ and has proven that the United States of America still operates under the rule of law.&nbsp;On&nbsp;Friday, June 28, 2024, SCOTUS delivered a 6-3 decision in&nbsp; the landmark&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf">Fischer v. USA</a> case. Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Jackson joined. Jackson filed a concurring opinion. Barrett filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor and Kagan&nbsp; joined.“To prove a violation of Section 1512(c)(2), the Government must establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or as we earlier explained, other things used in the proceeding, or attempted to do so. The judgment of the D. C. Circuit is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. On remand, the D. C. Circuit may assess the sufficiency of Count Three of Fischer’s indictment in light of our interpretation of Section 1512(c)(2).” - Chief Justice RobertsAFLDS applauds SCOTUS for recognizing and correcting the tremendous&nbsp;<a href="https://aflds.org/fischer">miscarriage of justice</a> that was perpetrated on many hundreds of ordinary Americans across the country. The federal government’s weaponization of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512">18 USC § 1512(c)(2)</a> was unquestionably used to charge the J6 defendants with a maximized 20-year felony and punish them for daring to exercise their first amendment right to protest the actions of their elected officials.To date, more than 355 J6 defendants have been unjustly charged with “corruptly” obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding, or attempting to do so. Many have been sentenced with prison time ranging from 8 months to more than 4 years - and over 100 are still political prisoners today.&nbsp;As stated by AFLDS’ affiliate attorney, David Dalia: “The statute at issue in&nbsp;Fischer, 18 U.S.C. § 1512, is titled ‘Tampering with a witness, victim or an informant.” 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1) punishes anyone who ‘alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals’ evidence. None of the J6 defendants tampered with any evidence. So it’s very gratifying that the Supreme Court in&nbsp;Fischer decided today that the (c) (2) residuary clause must be read narrowly ,&nbsp; and that the ‘otherwise’ provision of §1512(c)(2) is limited by the list of specific ‘evidence tampering’ criminal violations that precede it in (c)(1).&nbsp; The residuary clause does NOT extend to acts&nbsp;unrelated to evidence tampering, such as mere misdemeanor trespass.”Mr. Dalia continued, “This § 1512(c)(2) residuary clause was relentlessly stretched by the DOJ to overcharge the J6 defendants for mere misdemeanor trespass, unlawfully giving the DOJ powerful leverage to wring plea agreements from defendants under the threat of illegal and extremely lengthy felony prison terms.&nbsp;Although J6 defendants were incessantly branded by the mainstream media as ‘insurrectionists,’ not one person was ever charged with insurrection, which ‘only’ carries a 10 year prison term. Instead, all were charged with §1512(c)(2)’s 20-year prison term. Thankfully, this unjust overcharge was rejected today by SCOTUS. Now all of the J6 defendants are entitled to have their long jail sentences immediately recalculated. In the vast majority of cases, this should result in their release. Relief for these long-suffering J6 defendants cannot come soon enough.”&nbsp;In response to SCOTUS’ ruling in the&nbsp;<a href="https://aflds.org/fischer">Fischer Case</a>, AFLDS Founder and President Dr. Simone Gold, firmly declared that the High Court’s decision is a “critical&nbsp; step for preserving the rule of law in our nation. With &gt;300,000 federal statutes providing pretext for federal prosecutors to target and selectively persecute anyone with an&nbsp;unrelated felony charge, SCOTUS has averted a dangerous precedent that would have been felt far beyond Fischer. This is a victory for all Americans and a monumental defeat for those attempting to legalize fascism in our country.”Dr. Gold added, “This is also a very personal victory to me. I faced this felony charge and chose to accept a plea deal because of the lengthy 20-year sentence. My friend and co-worker, John Strand, is currently serving a 30 month sentence in federal prison because he refused to accept a plea for this dishonest - and now definitively illegal - charge.”The High Court’s ruling sends a clear message that the selective persecution of the government’s “political enemies” will not be tolerated in the United States of America.&nbsp; AFLDS stands in solidarity with the J6 prisoners and their families. We will continue to fight for our first amendment right to free speech and the right to peaceably assemble.&nbsp;If you would like to see an example of how this statute was illegally used as a weapon to silence political protesters, please visit the website of AFLDS Creative Director&nbsp;<a href="http://johnstrand.com">JohnStrand.com</a> and watch the video and please consider a donation to his legal defense. John Strand is still in prison.# # #About AFLDSWe are the Nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.orgMedia Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director | Media@AFLDS.org &nbsp;

SCOTUS Delivers Historic Fischer v. USA Ruling

Government and Big Tech Empowered to Further Erode First Amendment. Washington, DC. – June 26, 2024.&nbsp;Today the High Court has failed to protect Americans’ free speech - a great threat to our civil rights.On Wednesday, June 26, 2024, SCOTUS delivered a 6-3 decision not to address the censorship claims of two State Attorneys General in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf">Murthy v. Missouri</a> case (formerly Missouri v. Biden). Justice Samuel Alito dissented, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.Justice Alito stated, “For months, high-ranking Government officials placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook to suppress Americans’ free speech. Because the Court unjustifiably refuses to address this serious threat to the First Amendment, I respectfully dissent.”&nbsp;Earlier this year, AFLDS filed an&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1707507071/aflds/Murthy_v_Missouri-Americas_Frontline_Doctors__Dr._Simone_Golds_Amici_Brief-file-stamped-2-9-2024_23-411-US2024_ki4q27.pdf">amici curiae</a>&nbsp;brief on behalf of AFLDS and Simone Gold, M.D., J.D. in support of the Respondents for affirmance of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/23/23-30445-CV1.pdf">ruling</a>. AFLDS denounces SCOTUS for failing to affirm the lower court's decision to permanently ban government agencies and their employees from colluding with Big Tech companies to suppress free speech over social media.As stated by an AFLDS affiliated attorney, David Dalia, “It is impossible to overstate the harm to our First Amendment as a result of the United States Supreme Court failing to defend free speech, on the grounds of ‘no legal standing to seek an injunction.’ This brilliant and unique First Amendment lawsuit was filed by the Attorneys General (AG) from the sovereign states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with several heavily censored medical, media, and health freedom leaders. Through extensive discovery, the AGs uncovered countless examples of unconstitutional censorship, coercion, and strong-arming of social media companies by numerous government bureaucrats. These employees were working at the White House, the Surgeon General’s office, CDC, NIH, HHS, FBI, the Census Bureau, and others.&nbsp;<a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520.293.0_1.pdf">The 155-page trial court opinion</a> by Judge Terry A. Doughty, released on July 4th, 2023 called the government’s censorship in this case arguably ‘the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.’”For example, White House Director Rob Flaherty told Twitter to immediately remove content which was&nbsp; critical of the Biden family. Twitter complied within 5 minutes. Flaherty’s demands were sometimes accompanied by cursing and threats. Flaherty also demanded that Facebook immediately tell him why they weren’t removing COVID posts quickly enough when he instructed them to do so.&nbsp; Surgeon General Murthy similarly told Facebook that he wanted Facebook to do more to censor speech which he deemed to be misinformation, and demanded information that showed Facebook’s compliance with these demands. Dozens of other examples were entered into evidence. We are shocked that the Supreme Court is allowing this illegal and unconstitutional government censorship of free speech to continue while this case is pending.&nbsp;Our federal government targeted and silenced dissenting voices speaking out against the “approved” COVID-19 narrative. Clear evidence of such censorship was seen in July 2020 when AFLDS’ viral White Coat Summit video received 20 million views in 8 hours before being taken down across all social media platforms at the behest of Anthony Fauci. AFLDS recognizes that the weaponization of censorship poses the single greatest threat to our Nation. The&nbsp;<a href="https://aflds.org/about-us/issue-briefs/the-state-of-the-union-of-censorship-in-america">Censorship Industrial Complex (CIC)</a> has the power to destroy our Nation from within. The evidence in this lawsuit showed that the institutionalized censorship went far beyond the narrative of COVID and included medical mutilation, climate change, election integrity, economic issues and Hunter Biden.&nbsp;In response to SCOTUS’ ruling, AFLDS Founder and President Dr. Simone Gold added that “Murthy v. Missouri is a deeply personal case for me due to the tremendous amount of work that I have done over the last few years and the tyranny I experienced first-hand. I was named by our own government as one of the worst purveyors of COVID-19 misinformation. They violated my constitutional liberties. And in doing so, they trampled on the rights of all Americans.”This case will continue to be litigated, as only the plaintiffs’ injunction against the governmental defendants was reversed. Plaintiffs’ other important claims of First Amendment violations, governmental actions taken in excess of its statutory authority, and Administrative Procedures Act violations, remain for adjudication by motion or by a trial on the merits. Hopefully plaintiffs will prevail at trial on these other important claims.&nbsp;We also note that the petition for relief of Rogan O’Handley (aka D.C. Draino) remains pending in his&nbsp; linked social media censorship case of O’Handley v. Weber. Mr. O’Handley’s petition has been held by SCOTUS&nbsp; for more than a year, presumably pending this decision.&nbsp;&nbsp;The High Court’s ruling in the Murthy v. Missouri case represents a dark day for free speech and civil liberties in our Nation - further advancing the corporate and fascist agenda of the Censorship Industrial Complex. AFLDS will continue to fight the tyranny of weaponized censorship no matter who wields it.# # #About AFLDSWe are the Nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.org Media Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director | Media@AFLDS.org

SCOTUS’ Murthy v. Missouri Ruling Subverts Free Speech 

AFLDS and Simone Gold, M.D., J.D. file&nbsp;amici curiae brief in SCOTUS Case in support of Respondents in Vivek&nbsp;H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al. v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, (U.S.2023).&nbsp;&nbsp;This case continues to be one of&nbsp; the most significant First Amendment, free speech, and civil rights cases in our Nation’s history. The original plaintiffs, now Respondents, including supporters and activists in the burgeoning medical freedom movement, are especially and justifiably prayerful for a swift and judicious affirmance of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling.New Orleans, LA – February 9, 2024 On Friday, February 9, 2024, the America’s Frontline Doctors’ (AFLDS) legal team vigilantly filed an&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1707507071/aflds/Murthy_v_Missouri-Americas_Frontline_Doctors__Dr._Simone_Golds_Amici_Brief-file-stamped-2-9-2024_23-411-US2024_ki4q27.pdf">amici curiae</a>&nbsp;(friends of the court)&nbsp;brief on behalf of AFLDS and Simone Gold, M.D., J.D. in support of the Respondents for affirmance (agreement with) of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, New Orleans, LA. In short, we are asking the High Court to permanently ban our government from interfering and colluding with Big Tech companies to suppress free speech, especially in the social media arena.&nbsp;The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Missouri and Louisiana v Biden et al., affirmed and modified the&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1691668631/PDF_2_Missouri_v_Biden_Ruling_07_04_2023_d46950fd10.pdf">injunction</a> by Judge Doughty, who recognized AFLDS’ video press conference of July 2020 as being “censored” by social media platforms at the behest of Fauci. The name of the case changed to Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, Petitioners v. Missouri, et al. when it was assigned to SCOTUS. The “Respondents” that we are supporting on the side of Free Speech are the winning plaintiffs in the lower courts, including the two plaintiff states of Missouri and Louisiana, Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit, and several doctors.This is the second&nbsp;amici curiae brief&nbsp; that AFLDS’ legal team has contributed to this case - the first of which was filed in August of last year. Our&nbsp;<a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/about-us/press-releases/aflds-files-amici-curiae-brief-in-support-of-plaintiff-appellees-in-missouri-and-louisiana-et-al-v-biden-et-al">press release</a> dated August 10, 2023 summarizes the significance of the&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1691668576/Missouri_and_Louisiana_v_Biden_Amici_Brief_America_s_Frontline_Doctors_and_Dr_Gold_FINAL_stamped_8_7_2023_2022_01213_WDLA_23_30445_CA_5_1_8dbb283db4.pdf">Missouri and Louisiana, et al. v. Biden, et al</a> case in the fight to maintain our constitutionally-protected right to free speech.As stated by an AFLDS affiliated attorney, David Dalia, our fight continues, as it “is an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment for government officials to coerce, strongarm, or threaten private social media companies to remove or suppress free speech with which they disagree. Government officials should know this. They can’t violate the Constitution just because a government actor has a different (and unconstitutional) opinion. We join with dozens of other organizations, media outlets and states in asking the United States Supreme Court to reinstate the Fifth Circuit injunction, which merely requires the government actor Defendants to follow the Constitution.”AFLDS continues to work diligently to fight all forms of unconstitutional tyranny. Our&nbsp;amici curiae&nbsp;brief submission signals to the Supreme Court that more medical free speech is needed, not less, and to allow each American to decide what information they want to consider.&nbsp; &nbsp;# # #About AFLDSAmerica's Frontline Doctors is the nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard yourfuture.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.org Media Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications&nbsp;Director | Media@AFLDS.org &nbsp;

AFLDS and Simone Gold, M.D., J.D. file amici curiae brief in SCOTUS Case

The court’s decision will set a precedent for doctors nationwide and affect the longstanding sacred patient-doctor relationship. AFLDS Headquarters - Naples, FL – Nov. 9, 2023Dr. Simone Gold, the founder and president of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) recently filed a&nbsp;<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1699541967/Simone_Gold_v_CMB_COMPLAINT_1_piea9q.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">complaint </a>against the Medical Board of California (CMB), its president, Kristina Lawson, and 20 related board members (collectively, the “defendants”). Dr. Gold is suing the defendants in an effort to block the Board from illegally threatening the status of her California physician&nbsp; license, and to preserve her dignity, reputation, and her constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights to free speech and due process.The complaint alleges the defendants exceeded their authority in charging Dr. Gold with dubious allegations and are liable for six counts of unconstitutional and unlawful violations relating to their continued and unprovoked “investigations” of Dr. Gold. Kristina Lawson, in particular, acted with extreme personal vendetta.&nbsp;Attorneys for Dr. Gold maintain the defendants have no legal basis in fact to target her. Rather, they allege the defendants’ charges against Dr. Gold are in retaliation for her outspoken advocacy of early medicinal treatments for Covid-19 (CV19) (including both FDA approved&nbsp;<a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/medical/hydroxychloroquine/white-paper">hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)</a> and&nbsp; <a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1660710097/aflds/607708ef0ff74c66195482ec_IVERMECTIN_FINAL_FINAL_1_15_12_WITH_TABLES_FIGURES_compressed_4e1e2bfbcf.pdf">ivermectin</a>), in lieu of “vaccination” or the combined&nbsp;<a href="https://frontline.news/post/i-will-die-free-vax-free-man-denied-kidney-transplant-after-being-given-remdesivir">remdesivir</a> and&nbsp;<a href="https://frontline.news/post/fda-classifies-covid-ventilator-recall-as-deadly">ventilation</a> treatments which can be potentially lethal and are still mandatory at most hospitals nationwide.Dr. Gold seeks declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages. This means she’s asking the court to 1) formally acknowledge the defendants have willfully and recklessly violated her constitutional rights; 2) prohibit them from any future investigations into her protected free speech; and 3) monetarily compensate her (and her attorneys) for depriving her of her right to practice medicine, defiling her personal and professional reputation, and for violating her constitutional rights.In July 2020, Dr. Gold and the original frontline doctors courageously stood on the steps of the Supreme Court, publicly denounced medical censorship and tyranny, and declared the truth about CV19. The&nbsp;<a href="https://aflds.org/videos/post/white-coat-summit-2020-flashback">event</a> was live streamed and viewed by an estimated 20 million viewers before internet controllers scrubbed the video from every media platform.&nbsp; In late December 2020, Dr. Gold requested and received a permit to speak at the U.S. Capitol on January 6&nbsp;(J6). About a month after her speech, she was violently arrested in her California home for alleged trespassing. After observing that all J6 defendants, including bystanders and observers, were being selectively persecuted with severe felony charges without evidence, Dr. Gold accepted a plea deal for a misdemeanor. For the first time in his judicial career, the J6 D.C. trial judge sentenced a nonviolent misdemeanant to 60 days in maximum security federal prison.&nbsp;Very surprisingly, it was revealed at Dr. Gold’s sentencing, that the president of the CMB, Kristina Lawson, had an extraordinary personal vendetta against Dr. Gold. Kristina Lawson wrote a four-page letter to the Judge filled with vitriol against Dr. Gold. At sentencing the Judge clearly indicated that the “crime” was not related to the practice of medicine. But the “investigations” by Kristina escalated. In August 2023, Dr. Gold received correspondence from the defendants that several of their “investigations” were “now closed.” Dr. Gold and her attorneys were never informed of any such investigations, which is required by law. The defendants’ claim that Dr. Gold’s speech on J6 is a “Conviction of a Crime Substantially Related to the Qualifications, Functions, or Duties of a Physician and Surgeon” and “General Unprofessional Conduct.” In its 147-year history, the CMB has&nbsp;never sought the removal of a doctor’s medical license for a misdemeanor trespass.&nbsp;The Medical Board of California typically sanctions doctors for highly egregious misdeeds related to the practice of medicine such as sexual abuse of patients, gross incompetence, or healthcare fraud.Dr. Gold is set for hearing before the California Medical Board on November 13. Her attorneys will argue that her misdemeanor conviction is not substantially related to her qualifications as a doctor and surgeon. Should Dr. Gold&nbsp;not prevail, there will be a new standard in California - that politically protected speech and a misdemeanor plea can cost a licensee their livelihood. This is extraordinarily dangerous.&nbsp;While the defendants expend valuable taxpayer funded resources and time to unlawfully pursue and threaten Dr. Gold, it’s important to note the agency has been derelict in their own statutory mission and authority. One of the primary roles of the CMB, which is backed by the Governor and the state’s legislative branch, is to protect the health and safety of Californians. However, in spite of the numerous aforementioned scientific studies that support Dr. Gold’s assertions of early treatment for CV19, and the plethora of scientific studies that show the dangers of the CV19 shots, the CMB has clearly been negligent in protecting the health and safety of Californians by censoring reputable doctors and mandating potentially life-threatening and experimental treatments.&nbsp;&nbsp;Doctors must be able to practice the unfettered art of medicine pursuant to their decades-long acquired education, professional experience, Hippocratic Oath, and constitutional right to free speech – barring interference from self-righteous non-physicians, unelected government bureaucrats, lesser governmental units, agents, subordinates, and all other proxy agents of the federal and state governments.&nbsp; If a federal or state government, regulatory agency, or one of its proxies can coerce, bully, threaten, silence, slander, defame and interfere with the sacred doctor-patient relationship; stifle the constitutional right to free speech; and imprison a non-violent, highly qualified, well-credentialed doctor over a political misdemeanor trespass –&nbsp;then none of us are safe from government tyranny.# # #About AFLDSAmerica's Frontline Doctors is the nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard yourfuture.&nbsp;AFLDS.orgMedia Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications Director | Media@AFLDS.org &nbsp;

Simone Gold, M.D. v. Medical Board of California et al. Dr. Simone Gold sues the California Medical Board and its president, Kristina Lawson

This lawsuit is poised to be the most significant First Amendment, free speech, and civil rights case in our nation’s history. The plaintiffs, including supporters and activists in the burgeoning medical freedom movement, are especially and justifiably prayerful for a swift and judicious outcome.New Orleans, LA – August 10, 2023On Monday, August 7, 2023, the Americas Frontline Doctors’ (AFLDS) legal team vigilantly filed an <a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1691668576/Missouri_and_Louisiana_v_Biden_Amici_Brief_America_s_Frontline_Doctors_and_Dr_Gold_FINAL_stamped_8_7_2023_2022_01213_WDLA_23_30445_CA_5_1_8dbb283db4.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">amici curiae&nbsp;(friend of the court)&nbsp;brief</a>&nbsp;on behalf of AFLDS and Simone Gold, M.D., J.D in support of plaintiffs with the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit, New Orleans, LA.Missouri and Louisiana, et al. v. Biden, et al. Missouri and Louisiana, et al. v. Biden, et al.&nbsp;was filed in May 2022, and the plaintiffs include several highly credentialed doctors (Drs. Bhattacharya, Kulldorff, Kheriaty) and health professional Jill Hines, Co-Director of Health Freedom Louisiana. The plaintiffs allege the Biden administration colluded with Big Tech to censor their free speech opinions and scientific facts concerning a myriad of COVID-19-related topics including masking, lockdowns, early treatment, and the COVID-19 “vaccines.”&nbsp;In September 2022, the presiding Judge, Terri A. Doughty, issued a rare and unprecedented “expedited” discovery requirement (discovery is required to be produced and exchanged by both parties in a lawsuit). This expedited discovery process revealed a plethora of alarming documents which proved unelected bureaucrats colluded with one another against the plaintiffs. In an October 2022 order, Judge Doughty wrote that, “…Plaintiffs have proven that Dr. Fauci has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”The discovery documents have thus far revealed a monstrous, interconnected web and cabal, which includes Fauci, the CDC, State Department, White House, and high-ranking government officials and agencies – each of whom colluded in tandem and “significantly encouraged” and “coerced” social-media platforms to suppress the plaintiffs’ Constitutionally protected free speech on their platforms. Kennedy, et al. v. Biden, et al. A class action lawsuit, Kennedy, et al. v. Biden, et al., was filed in March 2023, and includes plaintiffs Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense (CHD), and Connie Sampognaro (a healthcare professional in Louisiana), who allege the same claims as plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden against the Biden regime. Judge Doughty recognized the parallels between the two cases, including the same defendants (Biden, his high-ranking staff, and Fauci), and consolidated the two cases in July 2023.AFLDS – Recognition by Judge Doughty Recently, Dr. Gold and AFLDS were named in a <a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1691668631/PDF_2_Missouri_v_Biden_Ruling_07_04_2023_d46950fd10.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">155-page memorandum ruling</a> by Judge Doughty, who recognized AFLDS’ first video press conference of July 2020 as being “censored” by social media platforms at the behest of Fauci. Judge Doughty’s incredible ruling in overwhelming support of the plaintiffs was perhaps symbolically and intentionally filed on Independence Day, July 4, 2023.These combined cases are not just pivotal for retaining the plaintiffs’ obvious, Constitutionally protected First Amendment right to free speech. The outcome is critical for every patriotic, freedom-loving American. If free speech of highly credentialed scientists, doctors, and civil rights activists like Dr. Gold in this case can be criminally and unconstitutionally squashed at the whims of our Federal Government, then every American should be alarmed.As stated by an AFLDS affiliated attorney, “It is an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment for government officials to coerce, strongarm, or threaten private social media companies to remove or suppress free speech with which they disagree. Government officials should know this.”AFLDS continues to work diligently to fight all forms of unconstitutional tyranny. Noting a list of his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.arrestfauci.com/">crimes</a>, Dr. Gold and the frontline doctors recently presented more than 100,000 petitions, signed by the American people, to Congress calling for the arrest of Fauci.The highly anticipated Fifth Circuit oral argument in Missouri v. Biden discussing the trial court decision by Judge Doughty will be made on August 10, 2023, at 1:00 PM CT and will be live streamed. We strongly encourage the reader to&nbsp;<a href="https://5thcircuit.streamguys1.com/enbanc">listen</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;# # #About AFLDSAmerica's Frontline Doctors is the nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future.&nbsp;Visit AFLDS.orgMedia Contact&nbsp;Lisa Alexander, Communications&nbsp;Director | Media@AFLDS.org

AFLDS files amici curiae brief in support of plaintiff-appellees in Missouri and Louisiana, et al. v. Biden, et al.

Washington, DC – July 28, 2023At the third annual White Coat Summit: The Reckoning, Dr. Simone Gold and America’s Frontline Doctors were joined by four members of Congress and one Senator as they stood in front of the Supreme Court and demanded accountability for the perpetrators who coerced illegal and unconstitutional COVID-19 mandates on American citizens. More than 100,000 petitions calling for the arrest of Fauci, signed by the American people, were presented to Congress. Crimes against humanity have been committed, and justice must be served. The event was live streamed and can be viewed <a href="https://rumble.com/v32qjay-breaking-physicians-and-members-of-congress-gather-at-the-supreme-court-of-.html">here</a>.Chief among the perpetrators is Anthony Fauci, who propagated a litany of medical disinformation in the mainstream media. He was the chief architect in sowing unnecessary fear in the public during the “plandemic”. In addition to exploiting the public’s fear of COVID-19, he propagandized the public into submission with illegal, unnecessary, unconstitutional, and damaging mandates including lockdowns, masks, and experimental shots. Fauci’s role during the “plandemic” was catastrophic and included multiple <a href="https://www.arrestfauci.com/">crimes</a>.Senator Roger Marshall, MD stated, “Every one of us [doctors] has taken care of thousands of patients with viruses before, but suddenly Dr. Fauci knew more than any of us did. What Dr. Fauci did was take his Gain of Function Mafia and professionally assassinate any doctor that disagreed with him.”Dr. Gold has vowed to “Drain the Science Swamp” and has named the<a href="https://fast.wistia.net/embed/iframe/kvajk1r8ro"> Dangerous Disinformation Dozen</a> - calling out the bad actors working to create a totalitarian system of healthcare where patients’ and doctors’ rights are completely eradicated.The Summit was a day filled with top experts evaluating how the COVID-19 emergency was used to exert control over the American people, what we could have done differently and how to prepare for the next ‘emergency’ that will surely come and be weaponized against us.The excuse that lockdowns, social distancing, masks, and C-19 shots were required, based on the illusory “Emergency Use Authorization” of a pandemic is over. The Day of Reckoning is here, and the perpetrators of these crimes must face justice. Any reprieve that we may enjoy now, regarding the lifting of mask mandates in many locations, for example, is likely temporary. We should not be lulled into forgetfulness, or quick to forgive and forget. American citizens are endowed by God and natural law to govern their own health, even during a pandemic. And they must have the choice to collaborate with a trusted, uncensored doctor, who is free to practice the unfettered art of medicine absent government threats. Our Constitutional Republic must prevail in the end.&nbsp;# # #About AFLDSAmerica's Frontline Doctors is the nation's independent authority on ethical and transparent standards in science, health, and human rights. We provide individuals with unbiased and accurate information from the world's top experts in medicine and law so you can be empowered with facts to protect your rights, take care of your health, and safeguard your future. Visit AFLDS.orgMedia Contact Lisa Alexander, Communications Director | Media@AFLDS.org

Protecting your Medical
Freedom and Civil Liberties

Who We Are

Press Releases