The Kamala Harris presidential campaign is requiring employees and volunteers to be fully vaccinated with the COVID-19 shots.“Harris for President requires all employees to be ‘up to date’ on COVID-19 vaccination status as prescribed by the CDC as a condition of employment, unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law,” reads a job ad for a Harris campaign senior designer. <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/10/05/us-news/kamala-harris-campaign-still-mandating-employees-get-covid-vax/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter">According</a> to the New York Post, the Harris for President website indicates that the mandate is in force for all open positions with the Democratic National Committee.“Although Harris claims to support science [t]he requirement is anti science. It suggests the campaign is still catering to the most irrational voices out there,” said University of California San Francisco Epidemiology and Biostatics Professor Dr. Vinay Prasad.<h2 id="">An unending vaccine mandate?</h2>Harris does not appear to have ever paused her demand for COVID-19 vaccinations. In January last year, she gave a speech promoting abortion where attendees were <a href="https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/freshman-congressman-boycotts-biden-event-over-attestation-of-vaccination-white-house-responds" id="">forced</a> to sign an “Attestation of Vaccination” form affirming their vaccination status. Anyone not fully vaccinated was ordered to submit a negative COVID test, wear a mask, and physically distance themselves from others.&nbsp;“Guests who are unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, or who decline to indicate whether they are fully vaccinated will be required to (i) complete a COVID-19 test at most 3 days prior to the event, (ii) wear a mask at all times while attending this event, and (iii) maintain proper social distancing protocols at the event,” read the form.&nbsp;The White House indicated that the requirement to disclose one’s vaccination status and restrictions for those with a lower vaccination status were “in accordance with White House health and safety policies, and consistent with guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”&nbsp;However, contrary to the White House’s claim, the CDC had months before <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7133e1.htm" id="">changed</a> its guidance on COVID-19 “prevention measures” to “no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination status.” CDC guidance also does not require vaccination status disclosure.&nbsp;Despite her endless vaccine mandate, Harris has continued to maintain that the government has no right to control an individual’s bodily autonomy.‍

Your body, her choice: Harris campaign maintains vaccine mandate

Harris does not appear to have ever paused her demand for COVID-19 vaccinations

Virtually everyone agrees that significant mistakes were made in most governments' handling of the COVID "pandemic." In the United Kingdom, the official COVID&nbsp;inquiry is now underway, tasked with identifying errors and making recommendations for the future. The tone for the inquiry was set by Professor Chris Whitty, the UK's Chief Medical Officer and the country's closest equivalent to Dr. Fauci, who <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/sep/26/future-pandemic-as-big-as-covid-is-inevitable-says-whitty" id="">predicted </a>a looming pandemic that will be "on the same scale" as COVID. And in case anyone thought that pandemic preparations could proceed at a leisurely pace, those testifying before the inquiry made sure to emphasize the quasi-apocalyptic nature of COVID, recounting hair-raising tales that may or may not have occurred...‍<h4 id="">UK's Fauci: Get ready for next pandemic</h4>Professor Whitty was quite clear that disaster is about to strike once again. “We have to assume a future pandemic on this scale will occur,” he told the UK’s public inquiry into COVID. “That’s a certainty.”Describing what he called the UK's “lack of intensive care capacity,” Whitty warned that a new virus that could be transmitted by people with or without symptoms was certain to appear again and that the government had to be ready to face the challenge.‍<h4 id="">COVID was like 'daily terrorist attacks'</h4>Also testifying at the UK COVID inquiry was Professor Kevin Fong, whose <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/sep/26/doctor-in-tears-at-covid-inquiry-says-what-nhs-staff-saw-was-indescribable" id="">account </a>was frequently punctuated by weeping as he described COVID patients “raining from the sky” at the peak of the “pandemic.”Fong is a former clinical adviser to the UK government on emergency preparedness, resilience, and response. As part of his job, he visited several intensive care units during the COVID waves. His first visit was in April, 2020, when excess deaths that year peaked. He told the inquiry that the visit was unforgettable.<blockquote id="">I was greeted at the entrance by one of the intensive care registrars. I asked him immediately what things had been like. I’ll never forget … He replied: “It’s been like a terrorist attack every day since this started, and we don’t know when the attacks are going to stop.</blockquote>‍<h4 id="">Don't rely on the data — rely on me</h4>Fong insisted that the official data failed to capture the extent of the crisis — how some hospitals were close to being in a “state of collapse.”<blockquote id="">The scale of death experienced by the intensive care teams during Covid was unlike anything they had ever seen before. They’re no strangers to death — they are the intensive care unit. They look after some of the sickest patients in the hospital, but the scale of death was truly, truly astounding.</blockquote><blockquote id="">We had nurses talking about patients raining from the sky, where one of the nurses told me they just got tired of putting people in body bags.</blockquote><blockquote id="">[One hospital] said that sometimes they were so overwhelmed that they were putting patients in body bags, lifting them from the bed, putting them on the floor, and putting another patient in that bed straight away because there wasn’t time.</blockquote>In fact, according to Fong, things were so bad that hospitals were running out of body bags and started using “clear plastic sacks and cable ties” instead. <blockquote id="">And those nurses talk about being really traumatized by that, because they had recurring nightmares about feeling like they were just throwing bodies away ... Hospitals were drowning in patients.</blockquote>‍<h4 id="">Nurses wore diapers?</h4>Responding to the harrowing descriptions, an organization named Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, which represents thousands of people, said that what transpired was “not inevitable, can never be considered acceptable, and must never be repeated.”All quite understandable if one accepts Fong’s description of COVID as “the biggest national emergency this country has faced since World War Two,” as the BBC relates. In fact, Fong said that the hospitals’ experience of COVID was worse than the immediate aftermath of recent deadly terrorist attacks such as the July 7th London bombings:<blockquote id="">I worked in the emergency department during the 7th July suicide bombing with the helicopter medical service. And nothing I saw during all of those events was as bad as really Covid was every single day for every single one of these hospitals through the pandemic surges.</blockquote>The British <a href="https://www.rcn.org.uk/news-and-events/Blogs/raising-the-voice-of-nursing-in-the-covid-19-inquiry-270924" id="">Royal College of Nursing</a> called Fong’s testimony “powerful” and noted that it would “bring back disturbing memories for many nursing staff.” The <a href="https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/coronavirus/covid-inquiry-nurses-battled-scenes-from-hell-on-wards-27-09-2024/" id="">Nursing Times</a> repeated Fong’s descriptions of “scenes from hell” and how some nurses, lacking time for bathroom breaks, were forced to wear adult diapers during shifts.‍<h4 id="">Made in China...</h4>As Fong concluded his testimony, the <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9py388z17o" id="">BBC </a>writes, he was “thanked by the inquiry’s chairwoman, Baroness Hallett, who said that ‘it was obvious how distressing it was for you and reliving such an ordeal is never easy.’”Ordeal? What ordeal? Fong’s tears were perhaps real, but what about the events he described?Scouring the internet for references to British nurses wearing diapers comes up with nothing more than Fong's own account. A few articles written back in 2020 refer to Chinese nurses wearing diapers for long shifts. Did Fong take these stories, cleared by the CCP, as inspiration and fact? And why did the Nursing Times and the British Royal College of Nursing, whose members knew whether or not they were forced to wear diapers, report Fong's testimony without challenge or even curiosity?And as for the "bodies raining from the sky" ...‍<h4 id="">The real numbers</h4>According to <a href="https://www.thetimes.com/article/revealed-how-elderly-paid-price-of-protecting-nhs-from-covid-19-7n62kkbtb" id="">The Times of London</a> in an article published in late 2020, there were 59,000 “extra deaths,” surpassing the expected amount based on yearly averages, during the entire first six months of the “pandemic,” which covers the period Fong described in April of that year.Of those 59,000 excess deaths, 26,000 occurred in care homes for the elderly. Another 25,000 occurred in private homes. That leaves just 8,000 excess deaths in hospitals, and The Times adds that of those, only around 5,000 occurred in ICUs. (It is also far from clear that this represented a surge higher than that found during years when influenza accounted for large numbers of deaths.)Furthermore, as an article in <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20201101024420/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/10/20/dont-believe-scare-stories-hospitals-running-icu-beds/" id="">The Telegraph</a>, also from 2020, points out, “the NHS was able to cope even at the height of the first wave in April ... without ... resorting to the Nightingale [tent] hospitals which had been built at huge speed and huge cost” to accommodate the expected deluge of COVID patients."Like a terrorist attack every day?Why didn’t Baroness Hallett call out Prof. Fong for misleading (at best) the inquiry?‍<h4 id="">COVID as terror</h4>Baroness Hallett officially launched the UK COVID inquiry and opened the first investigation in July, 2022. A former Court of Appeal judge and the first woman to ever chair the UK Bar Council, she is no intellectual lightweight. Baroness Hallett also acted as coroner at the inquest into the London bombings of July 7, 2005. As such, she was well-placed to assess Fong’s comparison between COVID wards and the aftermath of the terrorist attacks, in which 52 people lost their lives and 770 people were injured, some horrifically. Apparently, she did not see any reason to comment on the difference between a respiratory virus that was partially responsible for the deaths of many primarily elderly people with at least one significant comorbidity, and the shocking and sudden deaths of people who would otherwise have continued to live relatively healthy lives.‍<h4 id="">The problem of groupthink...</h4>As the inquiry began, Hallett stated that,<blockquote id="">It's time for facts, not opinions — and I will be resolute in my quest for the truth.</blockquote>The first phase of the inquiry dealt with the UK’s level of preparedness, which was found to be sorely lacking. Hallett also concluded that government ministers had suffered from “groupthink” as they had not received a “broad enough range of scientific advice.” She recommended, among other things, that the government processes for pandemic preparation be fundamentally overhauled:<blockquote id="">My report recommends fundamental reform of the way in which the UK government ... prepare[s] for whole-system civil emergencies.</blockquote><blockquote id="">If the reforms I recommend are implemented, the nation will be more resilient and better able to avoid the terrible losses and costs to society that the Covid-19 pandemic brought.</blockquote>&nbsp;Hallett also called for a nationwide pandemic response exercise to be held once every few years, and for “external expertise from outside government” to be brought in to “challenge and guard against the known problem of groupthink.”Central to her <a href="https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/uk-covid-19-inquiry-report-resilience-and-preparedness/#heading-3" id="">recommendations </a>was the establishment of a new, independent body that would run future pandemic preparedness exercises and responses, taking its guidance from scientists:<blockquote id="">Most importantly, the creation of a single, independent statutory body responsible for whole system preparedness and response ... [to] provide strategic advice to government and make recommendations.</blockquote>‍<h4 id="">... if you're from the wrong group</h4>It clearly became obvious, however, that Hallett's idea of independent and professional scientific guidance and the ideas of independent and professional scientists themselves are not at all the same. She has consistently disregarded or belittled the opinions of many leading scientists who disagree with the fundamental approach to pandemics that she supports, which is characterized by lockdown, social distancing, and mandated vaccines.An open <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240329091654/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/12/covid-inquiry-biased-say-scientists/" id="">letter </a>written by 55 leading scientists and academics to Baroness Hallett has now accused the inquiry of being “fundamentally biased.” The letter points out that Hallett has refused to listen to evidence from those who suffered from lockdowns; she initially <a href="https://www.mind.org.uk/news-campaigns/news/covid-inquiry-doubles-down-on-excluding-mental-health/" id="">refused </a>to consider at all the mental health impact of lockdowns and other “anti-COVID” measures on anyone, and only partially backed down with regard to children, but not adults, after organized protests and intense lobbying by parents’ groups.One of the signatories to the letter, Professor Sunetra Gupta, a world-renowned epidemiologist, was not even called to testify. Gupta was also one of the most prominent experts behind the Great Barrington Declaration which opposed sweeping lockdowns and instead argued for “focused protection” for those most at risk. But Hallett’s inquiry will apparently not delve at all into the question of whether lockdowns were beneficial — it takes the position that locking down faster, harder, and longer saves lives, and does not listen to any voices — including those of reputed scientists — who dare to present evidence showing otherwise.‍<h4 id="">Reporting on the past — or rewriting history?</h4>Hallett was also embroiled in a <a href="https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/covid-inquiry-chair-insists-she-decides-relevance/" id="">row </a>with the previous government under Prime Minister Sunak, due to her demand to be shown the notebooks and unredacted messages written by former PM Johnson. Sunak’s government responded to her demand by saying that the material was “unambiguously irrelevant,” to which Hallett countered that, “In my view, it is for the inquiry chair to decide what is relevant or potentially relevant.”Is this the type of “independence” she would like to see in a future UK pandemic governing body — independent from democratically elected politicians, independent and in fact divorced from any views it disagrees with?And, when the inquiry's reports are complete, will history accept their accounts of bodies "raining from the sky" as true representations of what occurred? Will the establishment once again succeed in writing propaganda into history and deceiving future generations?‍The information contained in this article is for educational and information purposes only and is not intended as health, medical, financial or legal advice. Always consult a physician, lawyer or other qualified professional regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition, health objectives or legal or financial issues.

UK gov't medical adviser describes 'bodies raining from the sky' during COVID

His testimony to official inquiry goes unchallenged. But were things really that bad?

From toxins to nutrition: Senator Booker’s bill to transform school lunches

Can we eliminate those toxins from vaccines too?

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may be prioritizing aid for disaster victims who identify with the LGBTQ group, according to resurfaced footage from last year.<h2 id="">‘Disaster equity’</h2>A video of a preparedness meeting from early 2023 shows FEMA Mitigation Emergency Management Specialist Tyler Atkins, who says his pronouns are “he/they,” advocating to focus disaster relief on “LGBTQIA” people.“LGBTQIA people and people who have been disadvantaged already are struggling. They already have their own things to deal with. So you add a disaster on top of that, it’s just compounding on itself. I think that is maybe the why of why we’re having this discussion. It isn’t being talked about, it isn’t being socialized. We’re not paying attention to this community,” Atkins said.Maggie Jarry, an emergency coordinator with the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), responded that FEMA relief is no longer about helping the most people possible.“The shift that we’re seeing right now is a shift in emergency management from utilitarian principles where everything is designed for the greatest good for the greatest amount of people to disaster equity,” she said.&nbsp;Jarry went on to suggest that government policies should be reconfigured to prioritize “disadvantaged communities” like LGBTQ.“But we have to do more, right? And so this topic is intersecting, I think, with a number of other topics where we have to look at policies and understand to what extent they have disadvantaged communities that have less assets, communities that have pre-existing vulnerabilities in accessing disaster-related recovery supports.”The meeting was titled “Helping the LGBTQI+ Community Before Disasters: Preparedness and Mitigation Considerations.” It was attended by FEMA Office of External Affairs Director Justin Knighten and FEMA Pride Federal Employee Resource Group Director of Education Reilly Hirst, among others.<div data-rt-embed-type='true'><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">FEMA Disaster Preparedness Meeting: &quot;We should focus our efforts on LGBTQIA people… they struggled before the storm&quot; &quot;FEMA relief is no longer about getting the greatest good for the greatest amount of people…. It&#39;s about disaster equity.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/IqXeKI8OTT">pic.twitter.com/IqXeKI8OTT</a>&mdash; End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) <a href="https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1843095899695931884?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 7, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><h2 id="">2020 FEMA report advocates prioritizing LGBTQ</h2>FEMA has been urging priority relief for LGBTQ people since 2020 when it published a <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20201222164130/https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_2020-national-preparedness-report.pdf" id="">report</a> claiming they are more vulnerable than others in natural disasters. The “LGBTQ+ community . . . may require additional or distinct support after a disaster occurs or during steady-state disaster preparation,” the report said.The agency has been heavily criticized for its disastrous response in aiding Americans displaced by Hurricane Helene. FEMA has not only been lax in providing relief but has also been actively <a href="https://truthpress.com/news/pete-buttigieg-orders-suspension-of-private-drone-flights-in-north-carolinas-hurricane-helene-flood-zone/" id="">preventing</a> aid from being delivered, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/elon-musk-says-feds-are-preventing-delivery-of-supplies-in-nc-talks-to-pete-buttigieg" id="">according</a> to those who have tried.‍

Protecting your
Medical Freedom
and Civil Liberties

Medical Mutilation

WHO Controls WHO?

Latest Work

Your body, her choice: Harris campaign maintains vaccine mandate

UK gov't medical adviser describes 'bodies raining from the sky' during COVID

From toxins to nutrition: Senator Booker’s bill to transform school lunches

Is the US government prioritizing disaster relief for 'LGBTQ people'?

Latest Videos

How Much IsYour Freedom Worth?