In March of 2020 Emma Burkey got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine because she worked with young children and was told she was putting their lives at risk. She expect the tragic turn her life would change after that decision. On April 2nd she had a seizure and was rushed to the hospital. After four strokes and three brain surgeries she is now confined to a wheelchair with little to no ability to move her arms or walk. She and many doctors believe this is the direct result of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

Chris was working with a fully vaccinated film crew when he was infected with Coronavirus, but the truth about early treatment championed by America’s Frontline Doctors gave him peace of mind, and a fully successful recovery. 

One by one, each member of this senior-age group family was infected with Coronavirus, but the truth about early treatment championed by America’s Frontline Doctors gave them peace of mind, and a fully successful recovery.

A local restaurant owner exercised Constitutional rights with both strength and humor, demonstrating the resolve it takes to retain our sacred American right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Real Stories of Frontline Interventions, featuring Lidia. This dedicated mother with a special needs child was sick and fearing the worst, until she found a life-saving solution at America’s Frontline Doctors.

The FBI’s Violent Attempt To Silence AFLDS”. What if you were a frontline doctor, who tried to warn her country that we are all being lied to; and that people don’t have to die?

A History of Women Arrested for Demanding Equality. History is not written by the faint of heart, and America has an inspiring tradition of strong women who demonstrated courage in their commitment to equal gender, race, and medical rights...even to the point of being arrested and jailed for it.

Make A Stand, a stirring invitation to stand for truth, the sanctity of human life, and the freedom we could soon lose, unless we unite and fight to preserve it.

The Normal Symbol, a “comic sense” response to pathetically patronizing celebrity advertising.

#ProtectTheChildren, a powerful short film and a critical campaign exposing the dangerous lack of proper risk assessment and missing long term safety data that makes the recent fervent push to inoculate children so incredibly reckless and unethical.

A heart-warming group participation in the historic song “We Are The World” with a striking performance of symbolism to demonstrate a unified return to truth, respect, and human freedom.

The CEOs of 10 major airlines signed a letter to President Joe Biden Wednesday asking him to lift mask mandates on airplanes and COVID-19 testing in international airports.&nbsp;“Given that we have entered a different phase of dealing with this virus, we strongly support your view that ‘COVID-19 need no longer control our lives.’” read the letter. “Now is the time for the Administration to sunset federal transportation travel restrictions … that are no longer aligned with the realities of the current epidemiological environment.”&nbsp;The letter, signed by the heads of American Airlines, Delta, Southwest, JetBlue, FedEx Express, UPS Airlines, and others said that “The science clearly supports lifting the mask mandate” and referenced a “CDC framework indicating that 99 percent of the U.S. population no longer need to wear masks indoors.”&nbsp;“It makes no sense that people are still required to wear masks on airplanes, yet are allowed to congregate in crowded restaurants, schools and at sporting events without masks, despite none of these venues having the protective air filtration system that aircraft do,” the letter continued.&nbsp;Biden has been staunchly pro-mandate, even threatening to veto a Congressional effort to abolish mask mandates.&nbsp;And to many people, that may be just fine.&nbsp;According to a February CBS News-YouGov <a href="https://capitolfax.com/2022/02/14/cbs-news-poll-by-56-44-margin-americans-want-statewide-mask-mandates-while-57-percent-of-parents-want-masks-required-in-schools-compared-to-36-percent-who-want-them-optional/">poll</a> of 2,578 adults, 56% think their states should have mask mandates.&nbsp;Interestingly, when broken down by vaccination status, most (66%) of those who are fully vaccinated and thus “protected” by the vaccine want mask mandates, while 66% of those who are “unprotected” by the vaccine do not want mask mandates.&nbsp;When parents were asked if mask wearing in their children’s schools should be required, optional or not allowed, 57% said required, 36% said optional and 7% said not allowed. It was not broken down by vaccination status.&nbsp;In another <a href="https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/af2sfv6t42/econToplines.pdf">poll</a> by YouGov/The Economist, people who live in communities with mask mandates were asked if they would still sometimes wear a mask even after the mandates are lifted. 63% of them said yes.&nbsp;On Wednesday, shock jock radio host Howard Stern <a href="https://dailycaller.com/2022/03/23/howard-stern-mask-mandate-republicans/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ranted</a> about the “wackos” who don't want to wear masks, blaming them for the end of mask mandates.“You’ve got all these wackos with their anti-mask, anti-vaccine. The reason they’ve lifted these mask mandates is because we gave into this small minority of people who are completely out of their f*cking mind who think masks are some sort of prison sentence and their freedoms are being taken away,” said Stern.On Monday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford lifted the province’s mask mandate. The same day, students from 11 Toronto high schools staged a walkout in protest of ending the mask mandate, <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/8698546/toronto-student-protest-mask-mandate/">according</a> to Global News.&nbsp;So while airlines may be ready to take off the masks, they may have passengers who don’t want to take off.&nbsp;

large_iStock-1297563004.jpg

medium_iStock-1297563004.jpg

small_iStock-1297563004.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1297563004.jpg

iStock-1297563004.jpg

World News

US News

While airlines may be ready to take off the masks, they may have passengers who don’t want to take off

Airline CEOs want to lift mask mandates. But do the passengers? w

New York City Mayor Eric Adams relented this week and lifted the vaccine mandate for athletes after backlash triggered by Kyrie Irving.&nbsp;Irving, all-star point guard for the Brooklyn Nets, has been the subject of media attention since last year for refusing to comply with the vaccine mandate. He was banned in October even from practicing with his team because he was not vaccinated. But Irving refused to bend the knee and maintained that&nbsp;“nobody should be forced to do anything with their bodies.”&nbsp;&nbsp;Then in December, when the vaccinated members of the Brooklyn Nets were hit with a COVID infection wave and suffered injuries, the Nets allowed Irving to play in road games.&nbsp;&nbsp;But Irving still hasn’t been allowed to play a home game since October.&nbsp;When Adams lifted the vaccine mandates for only the public sector on March 7th, many pointed out how this disadvantaged New York City’s athletes, who were kept under a vaccine mandate while visiting players were not.&nbsp;Specifically, fans went to bat for Kyrie Irving.&nbsp;Adams was honest when he replied that it wasn’t so much about public health, but about following rules.&nbsp;“It would send the wrong message just to have an exception for one player when we’re telling countless number of New York City employees, ‘If you don’t follow the rules, you won’t be able to be employed.'” he <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/video/2022/02/28/i-want-kyrie-on-the-court-says-nyc-mayor-eric-adams-of-nets-star.html">told</a> CNBC. &nbsp;The backlash became particularly fierce last week after Irving was forced to sit at a game with the fans, who were allowed to be unvaccinated, and watch his team play the New York Knicks. Then, he&nbsp;<a href="https://aflds.org/news/post/unvaxxed-kyrie-irving-steps-into-locker-room-team-gets-fined-dollar50k/">triggered</a> a $50,000 fine for his team by stepping into his own team’s locker room while unvaccinated.&nbsp;Adams faced intense outrage after that, with Irving’s own teammates and even The Daily Show's Trevor Noah blasting the mayor for a mandate that “makes zero sense”.&nbsp;“So Kyrie can go inside, not wear a mask, even hug a teammate but he cannot play," Noah said on his show. "I don’t get it, why? Does the ball have a weak immune system, what is going on? I mean, it’s crazy. Just think about it, Kyrie can’t play but he can sit in the stands, right, like a fan. And then as a fan, what happens if he gets picked to take the half-court shot to win the car? Can he do that? &nbsp;What are those rules, how does that work?”&nbsp;“Yeah, guys, I don’t care like how COVID compliant you are, shit like this makes zero sense, can we agree on this?” Noah added.&nbsp;As recently as Friday, Adams’ administration doubled down on the mandate,&nbsp;<a href="https://aflds.org/news/post/indefinite-nyc-first-to-make-vaccine-mandate-permanent/">reported</a> Frontline News. New York City&nbsp;Health Commissioner Dr. Ashwin Vasan told&nbsp;<a href="https://abc7ny.com/school-masks-nyc-vaccine-mandate-private-sector-vaccines-covid/11661750/">ABC7</a>&nbsp;on Friday that the vaccine mandate for private sector businesses has no end in sight.&nbsp;&nbsp;“I think it’s indefinite at this point,” said Vasan. “People who have tried to predict what’s going to happen in the future for this pandemic have repeatedly found egg on their face, as they say. And I’m not going to do that here today.”&nbsp;“I would love for me to sit here and say, I can give you a date or a data point for when we would lift those things,” he continued. “Right now, we are in a low-risk environment, and we will continue to evaluate that data.” &nbsp;&nbsp;But today, Adams did an about-face.&nbsp;“Today I signed emergency Executive Order 62, expanding the performance exemption to private employer mandates,” Adams said. “This is about putting New York City-based performance on a level playing field. Day one when I was mayor, I looked at the rule that stated ‘hometown players had an unfair disadvantage to those who we’re coming to visit.’”&nbsp;&nbsp;“And immediately, I felt that we needed to look at that,” Adams claimed.&nbsp;“But my medical professionals said, ‘Eric, we’re at a different place. We have to wait until we’re at a place we’re at a low area and we can re-examine some of the mandates.’ We’re here today.”&nbsp; &nbsp;

large_iStock-1371124618.jpg

medium_iStock-1371124618.jpg

small_iStock-1371124618.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1371124618.jpg

iStock-1371124618.jpg

Sports & Entertainment

Pushback-Resistance

NYC Eric Adams complete about-face

Freedom 1, Tyranny 0: NYC mayor breaks on vaccine mandate for athletes

A video has gone viral this week showing Cassady Campbell, a conservative comedian, impersonating a Leftist at a city council meeting in Denton, Texas.&nbsp;Campbell is known for his guerilla comedy stunts, such as offering Tesla cars to gas station customers in exchange for gas.&nbsp;On Tuesday, Campbell showed up to the meeting in a beanie and a “Biden for President” t-shirt. The “E” in “Biden” was composed of the colors of the rainbow.<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe width="100%" height="500" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5TLCpJvjpe8" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>The comedian’s rant covered hot-button issues on the Left, from Bernie Sanders to “transgenderism”. Campbell peppered his rant with shrieks, mimicking numerous <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrZxNh0uck4">videos</a> of Leftists expressing their rage with wordless howling.“In 2015, Bernie Sanders woke me up,” Campbell began. “My openly gay, six-year-old transgender nephew wanted something different than most kids for his birthday. He wanted the COVID-19 vaccine for the greater good of humanity.“Because unlike the racists Republicans, he wanted to do his part for democracy and take on his social responsibility to do his part for the greater good.”&nbsp;Then Campbell took subtle aim at the vaccine.&nbsp;“He is now gone from this world. He recently had a heart attack,” said Campbell, referencing the various <a href="https://aflds.org/news/post/new-bill-aims-to-compensate-covid-vaccine-victims/">heart complications</a> that are known to result from the COVID shot. “The doctors say they don’t know what caused it. But I know what caused it.”&nbsp;Campbell then started to act visibly unhinged, breathing heavily.&nbsp;“Stress, from Donald Trump supporters and the science deniers.”&nbsp;“Racist, bigot, homophobe!” he shouted.&nbsp;He then mocked the Left’s hatred for former President Donald Trump, whom many in the mainstream and social media commonly referred to as “literally Hitler” or <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/09/13/dont-compare-donald-trump-to-adolf-hitler-it-belittles-hitler/">worse than Hitler</a>.&nbsp;Campbell held up a photo of Adolf Hitler.&nbsp;“You might recognize this man as one of the most evil men, if not the most evil man in history is what you call him. But I have somebody who is much worse,” he said, holding up a photo of Trump in the other hand. “His name is Donald J. Trump. Now let me tell you why Donald Trump is worse than Adolf Hitler.”&nbsp;“Number one: Donald Trump hurts my feelings and Hitler does not. Number two: Hitler at least put people in quarantine camps and made them wear masks while Donald Trump continues to spew out Russian disinformation. Third: Hitler had the decency and kindness to kill himself. Meanwhile, Donald Trump is still alive. At least Hitler had the decency to leave us alone. Trump, on the other hand, refuses to kill himself, and makes him significantly worse.”&nbsp;Putting the photos down, he began to sob, and then shrieked wordlessly.&nbsp;“Now we’re in a war with Ukraine and Russia. If we had a nuclear war, it would be worth it if it could just save one life!” he said, pounding on the table.&nbsp;Campbell was referencing a trope the Left used to justify heavy-handed mandates during the pandemic. Mandate advocates&nbsp;rationalized that the public can be forced to do things “if it just saves one life.”&nbsp;SHRIEK.&nbsp;“Imagine living in the world with people who are selfish, science-denying, racist, transphobic, xenophobic, misogynistic bigots who people are actually supporting [inaudible]” - SHRIEK - “and take on social responsibility.”&nbsp;“The only way to fight for our democracy is to get vaccinated while supporting Ukraine. And that is your social responsibility, everybody.”&nbsp;Campbell then mocked Klaus Schwab, Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF). The WEF has drawn heavy criticism for its 2030 globalist <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hx3DhoLFO4s">predictions</a>, including “you’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy.”&nbsp;“One of the people I have begun to look up to is Klaus Schwab, and he said by 2030 you will own nothing and be happy, and I stand with him because I am not selfish!”&nbsp;SHRIEK.&nbsp;“And those who stand against it are selfish!”&nbsp;Then he began to sob.&nbsp;“For my closing statement, my only regret is that I didn’t stop Breonna Taylor’s killers, I still remember it like it was yesterday. I was shopping at Target in the pride section looking for a shirt for my six-year-old openly gay transgender nephew after I got off work at Starbucks where I’m a barista but at least I know that I was helping the LGBTQ community while Breonna Taylor was killed. Everybody -”&nbsp;Here Mayor Gerard Hudsbeth&nbsp;rang a bell and cut Campbell off.&nbsp;“That’s - that’s your time,” said Hudsbeth as Campbell continued to scream&nbsp;about Dr. Fauci.&nbsp;“I hate myself!”&nbsp;SHRIEK.&nbsp;“Thank you, that’s your time,” said the mayor. “Appreciate it.”&nbsp;Campbell, gathering his papers as he collapses into sobs, said he was going to “take a knee for George Floyd” and crouched down.&nbsp;“Yeah, can you do that over there so we can get the next person?” said Hudsbeth. “Thank you. So we'll take like a five-minute break and wipe all that down,” he said, pointing to the podium.Campbell’s Facebook page has over 737,000 followers.&nbsp;

large_snofl.png

medium_snofl.png

small_snofl.png

thumbnail_snofl.png

snofl.png

'Now let me tell you why Donald Trump is worse than Adolf Hitler'

Conservative comedian trolls Leftists at city council meeting in viral video

In an interview dropped on Twitter this week, Prof. Talia Geva revealed why she and her colleagues resigned from Israel’s <a href="https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/295134" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Helsinki Committee</a> in January 2020, raising questions about <a href="https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/294594" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Israel’s medical experimentation practices</a>.&nbsp;The Helsinki Committee is a medical watchdog whose purpose is to “authorize medical research and <a href="https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/295154" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">trials on humans</a>, which aim to expand medical knowledge and improve the outcomes of medical treatment.”&nbsp;In January 2020, just before the COVID-19 pandemic hit Israel, the Helsinki Committee suddenly received a letter from Health Ministry Director General Moshe Bar Siman Tov stripping them of their authority. &nbsp;Authority to approve research experiments on humans would now be given to local committees at hospitals who stand to benefit from participating in the research.&nbsp;“Go stand before your boss at the hospital and tell him that you object to the approval of a study that will earn millions for their shrinking budget,” said Geva. “When you sit on a hospital's committee and think to yourself that your hospital is likely to receive some hundreds of millions of shekels or tens of millions of shekels, that is likely to influence your decision to some extent.”&nbsp;Geva also explained why Siman Tov, who is an economist, made the decision.&nbsp;“It was presented to us that it is in the State's economic interest to invite more industrial pharmaceutical research projects,” she said. &nbsp;But Siman Tov needed a committee that would approve research, even if it meant skipping discussions about&nbsp;the ethics of the research, which is the committee’s main purpose.&nbsp;“The price that the State asked the Supreme Helsinki Committee to pay was to skip certain steps in the ethical deliberations necessary for approval of such studies, and we refused to be a part of that.”&nbsp;“That is why the Supreme Committee is so important,” Geva added. “It is external to the hospital and therefore is not subject to any of these conflicts of interest. We are not interested in, we do not agree to Israel becoming a playground for the drug companies. There is some research that they do only in third world countries, and we don't want that to be us.”&nbsp;Israel was the first country to roll out the vaccines after getting special terms in exchange for providing Pfizer with vaccination data.&nbsp;According to&nbsp;Globes, then-Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu revealed why Israel had received so many vaccine doses so quickly: Israel has committed to send Pfizer "data and details especially gathered for them, including the consequences of the inoculations, side effects, efficacy, amount of time it takes to develop antibodies. according to different types of population, age, gender, preexisting conditions etc. The agreement extensively details the various parameters that will be sent to Pfizer."&nbsp;Israel continued its experimentation on Israelis, eventually bypassing the Helsinki Committee altogether by the fourth dose, Times of Israel <a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/4th-covid-vaccine-dose-clinical-trial-delayed-after-key-panel-holds-up-approval/">reported</a> at the time.&nbsp;Hebrew media reported that "A study examining the effectiveness of a fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine has reportedly yet to commence, even as the Health Ministry moves forward with authorizing the extra shot for those at risk.&nbsp;"Sheba Medical Center outside Tel Aviv was scheduled to begin its trial on 100 volunteers this week after requesting approval from the so-called Helsinki Committee, which signs off on all clinical trials in Israel, at the beginning of December.&nbsp;"But the panel never authorized the trial."

large_iStock-1217986506.jpg

medium_iStock-1217986506.jpg

small_iStock-1217986506.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1217986506.jpg

iStock-1217986506.jpg

Legal News

'We do not agree to Israel becoming a playground for the drug companies'

Former Helsinki Committee member speaks out against Israel’s medical experimentation

Today a husband apologized to his wife in my office for harming their son. “I was wrong. I hurt both of you. And I’m sorry.” What did he do? Did he beat the child, starve him, abandon him in the grocery store? None of the above. He acknowledged that his irrational fear had led him to suffocate his child—literally and figuratively—through needless masking and social isolation. “I thought I was protecting him, but all I was protecting was my own anxiety.” He promised to immediately end these abusive practices and work on the emotional illness that led him to lose his way as a father.I did not expect to see this display of accountability and contrition. Most of my patients continue to cling to their fear, or they have abruptly dropped it without making note of why they suffered from it for the past two years. Both examples are indicative of an ongoing problem, but I find the latter to be far more troubling.When you have harmed someone else, especially your own child, due to your own clouded judgment and emotional instability, it is dishonest to pretend that nothing happened and simply forge ahead. You do yourself and your victim a disservice. Sweeping your sins under the rug simply defers the necessary process of making amends. Atonement must be made if your relationships are to survive.The process of acknowledging that you have harmed others can take many forms. In the case of the father who harmed his son, he chose to first apologize to his wife, whose resentment had grown so large that it threatened their marriage. Next, he will need to explain to his son that good intentions are no justification for injuring the person you love. Good intentions pave the road to hell.Did you get married in 2020 or 2021? If so, congratulations. Did you refuse to allow friends and family to attend the wedding if they were not “vaccinated?” If so, you have a much more important task to perform than writing thank-you cards for the wedding gifts. I recommend you set those cards aside and begin writing detailed personal letters of apology to each person you banished from your marital celebration out of a foolish, entitled display of narcissism and fear. If you expect to have any hope of maintaining those relationships, this is not optional. The public cruelty you displayed to those you pretend to care about has poisoned any good will you held, and you are deserving of being permanently cut off from everyone on the receiving end of your callousness.“But I was acting out of an abundance of caution. I was just trying to keep everyone safe. It was required by the wedding hall.” Nonsense. When the drunk blames the bottle for his wife-beating, he receives no sympathy, nor should you. Neither ignorance nor fear can justify or explain away such massively irresponsible actions. Acknowledging the harm you caused, however, is an excellent first step at repairing the damage.You are not alone. Millions of Americans have been acting out of fear for the past two years. Many are now moving on. Few, though, are showing the maturity and courage necessary to take responsibility for the damage their uncontrolled fear has caused to their family, friends, and community. If we are to ever recover as individuals or as a nation, each of us must be brutally honest and not shy away from facing the sadistic, cruel, ugly, and inhumane expression of our dark selves. We have engaged in a social genocide. Its organizers—politicians, bureaucrats, media titans, and corporate executives—should be held criminally liable. For millions of everyday Americans, though, a national truth and reconciliation process is needed. There is no way to move forward without an accounting for the sins of the recent past.&nbsp;Mark McDonald, M.D.Psychiatrist and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dissidentmd.com/">United States of Fear: How America Fell Victim to a Mass Delusional Psychosis</a>

large_iStock-1327689473.jpg

medium_iStock-1327689473.jpg

small_iStock-1327689473.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1327689473.jpg

iStock-1327689473.jpg

Blogs

Moving ahead means facing the past 

McDonald: Taking accountability

This week, satirical website The Babylon Bee was suspended from Twitter for posting a meme. The meme showed Rachel Levine, the transgender assistant Secretary of Health, featured as “Man of the Year” on a magazine cover. &nbsp;The post was a play on Levine being named “Woman of the Year” last week by USA Today.&nbsp;Then, Turning Point USA founder and executive director Charlie Kirk was also suspended from Twitter for the following tweet:&nbsp;“Richard Levine spent 54 years of his life as a man. He had a wife and family,” Kirk tweeted. “He ‘transitioned’ to being a woman in 2011, Joe Biden appointed Levine to be a 4-Star Admiral and now USA Today has named ‘Rachel’ Levine as a ‘Woman of the Year’. Where are the feminists??”&nbsp;Then, Fox News host Tucker Carlson was suspended from Twitter for saying that both of those tweets were true.&nbsp;Despite being banned from their accounts and large followings, all three refused to bend the knee and recant.&nbsp;"You may disagree with my stance on this issue, but now you can't even go on Twitter and disagree with me because they have disappeared what I said,” said Kirk. “It's this type of censorship that will ultimately destroy Twitter as a viable platform for speech, if that hasn't already happened. Competitors are popping up everywhere."&nbsp;Indeed, it seems as though conservatives are beginning to revolt against the woke corporations that are demanding their compliance with progressive ideologies, and they’re doing it through competition.&nbsp;Yesterday, Frontline News <a href="https://aflds.org/news/post/dailywire-taunts-woke-company-by-becoming-its-competitor/">reported</a> on Jeremy’s Razors, a company launched yesterday by the Daily Wire to compete with Harry’s, a woke men’s grooming line.&nbsp;Harry’s had been advertising with the Daily Wire until a disgruntled low-level employee of the conservative news site – who had two Twitter followers – tweeted a complaint to Harry’s about the Daily Wire’s traditional views on gender.&nbsp;After that, Harry’s pulled their ads from the Daily Wire, calling the news site’s views “inexcusable” and saying that there was a “values misalignment".&nbsp;So, the Daily Wire created Jeremy’s Razors, a men’s grooming line, to hit Harry’s where it hurts and draw away business.&nbsp;In fact, Jeremy’s Razors' entire identity is built around being the anti-Harry's, even selling its products on ihateharrys.com.&nbsp;In its launch ad, Daily Wire CEO and Co-Founder Jeremy Boering says that “if&nbsp;you’ve had enough of the woke bullsh*t and you’re tired of paying companies like Harry’s and Gillette who hate you, buy my new razor instead.”&nbsp;Jeremy’s Razors also bought out all the ad space in front of Harry’s headquarters and placed their ads there to taunt them.&nbsp;This was a new move for the conservative movement. This wasn’t simply an alternative, like Truth Social. This was an offensive. &nbsp;As Boering says, it’s time to exact a “penalty".&nbsp;“I want to create a price, an actual penalty by creating a market around the sort-of disenfranchised conservative buyer,” Boreing said. “I believe, in the long run, the only way to change the behavior of these big companies is to actually incentivize them with market forces into having to come compete for our business. They have to actually take a loss to realize that they have to change their behavior.”&nbsp;Boering explained how woke corporations bend other companies to their will.&nbsp;“They pay conservatives to help them reach an audience, they pay us to endorse their products — we only do it if they’re good products, we’re proud to have them as sponsors — we tell our audience about them, and then at the first sign of trouble, they stab us in the back, they betray us,” he said. “Not by pulling their money …. but for doing it publicly, they have to go virtue-signal, and by virtue-signaling and publicly saying, as Harry’s did, that our views are ‘inexcusable,’ they’re telling all of our other advertisers that the only ‘excusable’ thing to do, would be for them to also cancel us.”&nbsp;“Conservatives aren’t going to win by lamenting the loss of the culture, lamenting the loss of the economy,” Boreing emphasized. “We have to actually go create a new economy, we have to create a new culture.”&nbsp;

large_iStock-511386474.jpg

medium_iStock-511386474.jpg

small_iStock-511386474.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-511386474.jpg

iStock-511386474.jpg

This wasn’t simply an alternative - this was an offensive

The revolution against wokeness has begun

A social media platform will now ban users for things they say outside of the platform.&nbsp;Patreon, a site that allows content creators to be paid directly by their patrons, notified popular conservative commentator Sydney Watson that they were removing her account.&nbsp;The reason, according to Patreon, is that Watson's “content propagated what we consider to be negative stereotypes or segregationally content towards a protected community.”&nbsp;The problem is, Watson had not created any content on Patreon.&nbsp;“I never actually post[s] anything on Patreon itself, which means they're banning me purely based on what I've said on other platforms,” TheBlazeTV host tweeted. “And even then, reading through their guidelines, I haven't done a single thing listed.”&nbsp;But the platform explained that complication.&nbsp;“When reviewing, we take into consideration the content shared on Patreon as well as any activity taking place outside our platform.”&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Asked Patreon why they decided to ban me. They didn't answer. They note here they take into consideration everything you do outside their platform. This is batshit. This platform can hold your money hostage if they don't agree with what you do everywhere else. Insanity. <a href="https://t.co/dYEqKlAl4c">pic.twitter.com/dYEqKlAl4c</a>— Sydney Watson (@SydneyLWatson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SydneyLWatson/status/1506686013166469130?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>But Patreon goes one step further.&nbsp;When Patreon suspended HighImpactFlix in February for “COVID-19 medical misinformation”, they demanded that he remove his content on other platforms before they would reinstate&nbsp;his account.&nbsp;“Following our policy update concerning medical misinformation, Patreon can no longer support accounts that repeatedly use unfounded or debunked theories to argue against broadly supported public health measures on COVID-19,” wrote Reye from Patreon.&nbsp;“I took a look and reviewed your creator page today. In order to bring your page back within our guidelines, kindly review and remove any and all content that advances COVID-19 medical misinformation.”&nbsp;That’s when HighImpactFlix was told he must watch what he says on the internet.&nbsp;“Additionally, since our guidelines extend to any projects that you fund via Patreon, this means that online content linked to your creator page is subject to our guidelines.”&nbsp;Reye then included some links to HighImpactFlix’s content elsewhere on the World Wide Web&nbsp;that he can “fix” if he wants his Patreon account reinstated.&nbsp;Social media users are outraged at the overreaching policy.&nbsp;“Banning people for things they do off platform,” said Rubin Report host Dave Rubin in response to Watson. “Think of the insane ways this could go haywire. Patreon has been doing this for years and it was one of the reasons I created @onlocals.”&nbsp;“Seems that Patreon has banned two high-profile creators off their website today, @JoshLekach and @SydneyLWatson. Wretched move, reeks of another conservative purge. I'm sure this won't be the end of it. Going to monitor this closely,” said another user.&nbsp;“Hello @Patreon stop asking me to come back,” tweeted another user. “Not unless you bring everyone back you've banned. Including @SydneyLWatsonJust in case you didn't see my e-mail response. Go FUCK yourself.”&nbsp;“Heard Sydney Watson got her patreon taken down for hate speech,” wrote another netizen. “Such bs. They just don't like that she has her own opinions and goes against the msm narrative. That's why they came after her. Keep speaking the truth Sydney I support you and what you are doing.”&nbsp;

large_iStock-178485797.jpg

medium_iStock-178485797.jpg

small_iStock-178485797.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-178485797.jpg

iStock-178485797.jpg

'Think of the insane ways this could go haywire'

Social media platform now bans users for what they say off-platform

San Francisco, CA - March 16, 2022, America’s Frontline Doctors’ (AFLDS) Senior Affiliate Attorney, Heather Gibson, represented San Francisco firefighter, Michael Kricken, who faced termination for choosing not to comply with the unconstitutional vaccine mandate implemented by the San Francisco Fire Department.Public comment was permitted before the hearing. Due to the overwhelming number of callers in support of Mr. Kricken, and against the mandate and actions of the Department, time limits for comment were reduced to two minutes per person. One caller described the actions of the San Francisco Fire Department as “…detrimental to fire service nationwide, frustrating, and disgusting.” Another stated the Fire Department was “…participating in mass genocide and violating the Nuremberg Code.”Following public comment, Attorney Gibson expertly presented an opening statement and evidence that it was impossible to comply with the San Francisco Fire Department’s vaccine mandate as the mandate requires firefighters to “receive a vaccine approved to prevent the transmission of COVID-19.” Ms. Gibson presented evidence that no vaccine yet exists that prevents the transmission of COVID-19, therefore the mandate is relying upon patently false information. The opposing side, in their concluding statements, concurred that no vaccine exists that prevents transmission, but then made the shocking request that the Department should be able to simply disregard the words in their regulation.Attorney Gibson also presented evidence that Mr. Kricken, who was infected with COVID-19 in 2020, still has antibodies two years later. The panel dismissed this scientific information. Attorney Gibson presented evidence that after having a fully vaccinated force of firefighters, the department still had had hundreds of Covid cases. Even with these undisputed facts the Department denied Mr. Kricken’s request for a religious exemption, stating he posed too great of a “threat” to others.AFLDS coordinated testimony from world-renowned scientific health expert, Dr. Michael Yeadon, on behalf of Mr. Kricken. Dr. Yeadon, former Pfizer executive, is the most qualified expert in the world to testify on the topics of COVID-19 injections and natural immunity. Dr. Yeadon provided scientific testimony to the superiority of natural immunity and the failure of any COVID-19 vaccination to prevent infection or transmission. The Department provided no expert rebuttal to Dr. Yeadon’s testimony.After testimony and closing arguments, the board voted unanimously to deliberate in a private session. Following a brief recess, the board returned with a unanimous decisionto terminate Mr. Kricken for noncompliance with their farcical mandate. Mr. Kricken will appeal. AFLDS will continue to follow Mr. Kricken’s story.The entire hearing may be accessed <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/videos/post/aflds-attorney-heather-gibson-represents-san-francisco-firefighter-michael-kricken/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>, but was not yet available at the time of this press release.&nbsp;

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

Esteemed and courageous Founder of America’s Frontline Doctors, Simone Gold, MD, JD, made the difficult decision to agree to a&nbsp;plea&nbsp;deal&nbsp;regarding the activities of January 6.&nbsp;She pled to a&nbsp;misdemeanor for entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds.Dr. Gold, an emergency physician and attorney who spent years saving lives, has never&nbsp;denied her presence in the Capital.&nbsp;Recently, Dr. Gold stepped down from her position as a Board Member with AFLDS, and is focused on building a nationwide system of health and wellness clinics focused first and foremost on patient care.&nbsp;&nbsp;With regard to the prosecution of Dr. Gold for her speech in the Capitol on January 6, AFLDS protests a system whereby the laws are applied unequally, and notes that&nbsp;January 6 defendants are overwhelmingly victims of selective prosecution.We remember that in the summer of 2020 there were months of riots - and the DOJ brought no charges.&nbsp;We remember that in January 2017 hundreds of persons occupied&nbsp;the Capital, set fires in the street, burned cop cars, smashed windows - and again the DOJ did nothing.&nbsp;We The People&nbsp;are not free if our judicial system is weaponized: deployed to&nbsp;selectively prosecute some and restrained from prosecuting others.&nbsp;Our judiciary must enforce laws equally&nbsp;without favoritism or vengeance.&nbsp;America’s Frontline Doctors, the nation’s premier Civil Liberties organization, remains committed to our vital mission of regaining our lost freedoms and&nbsp;preserving&nbsp;all of our Constitutional rights.&nbsp;With the help of our&nbsp;tremendous supporters, we will keep fighting.&nbsp;Dr. Simone Gold is moving forward with a renewed focus on offering&nbsp;options besides&nbsp;the broken healthcare system which hurt so many patients and harmed our national interest.&nbsp;Her innovative new venture for wellness centers, aptly named Gold Care Health &amp; Wellness, will be announced shortly.Our support for Dr. Simone Gold will not waver and we continue to stand with her.

AFLDS Statement

New Orleans, LA—America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed an amicus curiae brief to the state of Louisiana civil district court on February 18, 2022. The filing, in support of the plaintiffs in Andrews, et al. v. Cantrell, opposes the autocratic mayoral vaccine mandates requiring individuals to be vaccinated in order to enter and use public accommodations in New Orleans. &nbsp;Attorney David A. Dalia filed the amicus brief on behalf of AFLDS in support of the case brought by Attorney Laura Rodrigue and joined by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry against New Orleans’ mayor LaToya Cantrell. Cantrell had issued a “Mayoral Proclamation to Further Promulgate Emergency Orders… Due to Covid-19” on April 15, 2020. The executive action has remained in place despite scientific evidence showing it is irrational.&nbsp;The brief cites AFLDS doctors and medical specialists who advise utilizing evidence-based determinations to set policy to deal with Covid. Evidence shows that natural immunity is superior to vaccine immunity, with waning immunity a major drawback associated with the Covid injections. &nbsp;AFLDS makes clear that the injections are actually treatments. Attorney Dalia’s brief lists several experts who recognize the reality that the Covid injections do not serve the traditional purpose of vaccinations, to stop transmission and provide immunity. The list includes NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Moderna Chief Medical Officer Dr. Tal Zaks, and Oxford vaccine team lead Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, among others. Dr. Martin Kuldorff, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, makes the point clearly, “The bottom line is that these vaccines do not prevent transmission.” &nbsp;Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Infectious Disease Epidemiologist states, as noted in the brief, “[I]t is really not logical to use [these] vaccines to protect other people… I don’t think they should be forced … simply because this vaccine does not prevent transmission. So, if you just think of the logic of it, what is the point of requiring a vaccine to protect others if that vaccine does not durably prevent onward transmission of a virus.”&nbsp;“There is simply no precedent in law for mandating healthy people take an injection that is temporally associated with hundreds of thousands of adverse events including heart attacks, stroke and death,” stated AFLDS founder, physician and attorney, Dr. Simone Gold. “It is the consensus that the injections don’t stop transmission or prevent infection. Numerous doctors and medical scientists attest to the fact that there are safe and effective alternative treatments. The mayor’s policy is arbitrary and counterproductive, and the mandates must stop.”&nbsp;Attorney Dalia argues, “The standard for evaluating an executive order such as the mayor’s proclamation is that it must be rational. And it fails to meet this basic requirement. The vaccine doesn’t create immunity. Even the FDA has classified these injections as ‘therapeutics.’ Under substantive due process analysis, the court must show that the action taken must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. The mandate, and the proclamation, is anything but.” &nbsp;Other states have already voluntarily dropped their mandates. D.C.’s Mayor Muriel Bowser ended its mandate affecting venues effective February 15, 2022. Florida similarly dropped its mandate. Recently, the Supreme Court struck down the OSHA mandate, ruling it as outside the authority of the executive agency. Attorney Dalia similarly argues, in addition to the constitutional arguments, the Mayor’s Proclamation is specifically forbidden by Louisiana state law which delegates to the legislative branch such measures. &nbsp;A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for March 3, 2022.&nbsp;

HOME.webp

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

New Orleans, LA—America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed an <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/files/amicus-curiae-brief-to-the-state-of-louisiana-civil-district-court/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">amicus curiae brief</a> to the state of Louisiana civil district court on February 18, 2022. The filing, in support&nbsp;of the plaintiffs in&nbsp;Andrews, et al. v. Cantrell, opposes the autocratic mayoral vaccine mandates requiring individuals to be vaccinated in order to enter and use public accommodations in New Orleans.&nbsp;Attorney David A. Dalia filed the amicus brief on behalf of AFLDS in support of the case brought by Attorney Laura Rodrigue and joined by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry against New Orleans’ mayor LaToya Cantrell. Cantrell had issued a “Mayoral Proclamation to Further Promulgate Emergency Orders… Due to Covid-19” on April 15, 2020. The executive action has remained in place despite scientific evidence showing it is irrational.The brief cites AFLDS doctors and medical specialists who advise utilizing evidence-based determinations to set policy to deal with Covid. Evidence shows that natural immunity is superior to vaccine immunity, with waning immunity a major drawback associated with the Covid injections.&nbsp;AFLDS makes clear that the injections are actually treatments. Attorney Dalia’s brief lists several experts who recognize the reality that the Covid injections do not serve the traditional purpose of vaccinations, to stop transmission and provide immunity. The list includes NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Moderna Chief Medical Officer Dr. Tal Zaks, and Oxford vaccine team lead Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, among others. Dr. Martin Kuldorff, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, makes the point clearly, “The bottom line is that these vaccines do not prevent transmission.”&nbsp;Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Infectious Disease Epidemiologist states, as noted in the brief, “[I]t is really not logical to use [these] vaccines to protect other people… I don’t think they should be forced … simply because this vaccine does not prevent transmission. So, if you just think of the logic of it, what is the point of requiring a vaccine to protect others if that vaccine does not durably prevent onward transmission of a virus.”“There is simply no precedent in law for mandating healthy people take an injection that is temporally associated with hundreds of thousands of adverse events including heart attacks, stroke and death,” stated AFLDS founder, physician and attorney, Dr. Simone Gold. “It is the consensus that the injections don’t stop transmission or prevent infection. Numerous doctors and medical scientists attest to the fact that there are safe and effective alternative treatments. The mayor’s policy is arbitrary and counterproductive, and the mandates must stop.”Attorney Dalia argues, “The standard for evaluating an executive order such as the mayor’s proclamation is that it must be rational. And it fails to meet this basic requirement. The vaccine doesn’t create immunity. Even the FDA has classified these injections as ‘therapeutics.’ Under substantive due process analysis, the court must show that the action taken must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. The mandate, and the proclamation, is anything but.”&nbsp;Other states have already voluntarily dropped their mandates. D.C.’s Mayor Muriel Bowser ended its mandate affecting venues effective February 15, 2022. Florida similarly dropped its mandate. Recently, the Supreme Court struck down the OSHA mandate, ruling it as outside the authority of the executive agency. Attorney Dalia similarly argues, in addition to the constitutional arguments, the Mayor’s Proclamation is specifically forbidden by Louisiana state law which delegates to the legislative branch such measures.&nbsp;A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for March 3, 2022.

Naples, FL—America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) announced today it intends to file suit against The Intercept for defamatory publication. AFLDS has retained noted attorney Steven Biss to stop defamatory statements and seek financial damages from The Intercept, largely funded by billionaire Pierre Omidyar,&nbsp;the founder of eBay.&nbsp;On February 14, 2022, The Intercept ran a blatant hit piece designed to interfere with&nbsp;founder, physician and attorney,&nbsp;Dr. Simone Gold's medical license and with ALFDS's organization. Dr. Gold, an emergency room physician, formed AFLDS to help stop the medical tyranny that has taken hold of the country and world.&nbsp;Virtually everything printed in the article is false, including implying this is a Project Veritas initiative. AFLDS is inspired by Project Veritas’ unwavering commitment to hold power brokers accountable. Christian Hartsock did not do any actual work on the project nor did any other PV staff. Christian is a friend, but he was not involved in the production of this project.The article falsely calls AFLDS "disinformation doctors." Dr. Gold explains, "My words have been proven true time and time again, including most recently two weeks ago, by&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fmedia%2Fjohns-hopkins-university-study-lockdowns-media-blackout&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cevan%40aflds.org%7C109d84cb72794e462b2d08d9f184dbff%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637806375202421978%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=lTj7QR2YkAgXlCruOsXSD3B1o0F7EEZoVGMW%2BxMBbM4%3D&amp;reserved=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johns Hopkins University</a>. 21 months ahead of Johns Hopkins, in May 2020, I was the first doctor to publicly call the nation’s attention to the lethal effects of the&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fgracemarieturner%2F2020%2F05%2F22%2F600-physicians-say-lockdowns-are-a-mass-casualty-incident%2F%3Fsh%3D49c8f07450fa&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cevan%40aflds.org%7C109d84cb72794e462b2d08d9f184dbff%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637806375202421978%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=Efqeyz5jXop98DKPOt5dQJuyjL5c4obl0UtlW38afvw%3D&amp;reserved=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">lockdowns</a>. Even two years later the media continues the lie, this time by a complete news blackout of the&nbsp;Johns Hopkins study by CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC.”"Independent physicians like myself continue to inform all people about the efficacy of early treatment and the widespread failure of&nbsp;informed consent for the experimental injections. That there are no long-term studies; that there is extensive data proving the shots cause deadly clots; that natural immunity is superior; and that alternative safe treatments are available is not disinformation: that's&nbsp;information&nbsp;that is being censored by specific persons who have financial and political reasons to lie to the public."The Intercept defamatorily accuses AFLDS of "accost[ing]" Kristina Lawson, the California Medical Board's president in an undercover exposé titled&nbsp;Doc Tracy: Physician Investigator. The Intercept is lying.&nbsp;"For this undercover series, we adhered to the highest ethical standards to uncover egregious wrongdoing by the medical establishment. The claims by The Intercept and Lawson's claims she was 'ambushed' are utterly unfounded.”&nbsp;Dr. Gold added, "I'm an advocate for&nbsp;Constitutionally&nbsp;protected free speech, which does not protect lies and falsehoods. You cannot maliciously&nbsp;malign someone, accuse&nbsp;them falsely of harassing a member of the medical board. Undercover journalism is a legitimate means for uncovering truth in a free society. The Intercept is engaged in trying to take out doctors who are acting honorably."Attorney Steven Biss, who represents high profile individuals, such as Devin Nunez in his defamation suits, said, "We intend to put an end to The Intercept."AFLDS's Associate Medical Director Dan Stock stated, "The Intercept is involved in a&nbsp;campaign to destroy Dr. Gold and AFLDS. It invokes the cancel culture on Joe Rogan's Spotify channel, it goes after Dr. Malone, falsely stating he's discredited, he's not, that's not true. It's the mainstream media who is promoting disinformation about the vaccine's efficacy and safety, not Dr. Gold."Mr. Omidyar has reportedly donated $1.5 million to the World Economic Forum and he collaborates with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on a worldwide digital identity initiative. His motivation is clear, he's deliberately trying to take out dissenting opinions using his money and libel.&nbsp;

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Takes Aim at The Intercept

Fort Worth, TX— February 4, 2022 - A Texas court <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/files/joint-status-report-document-55-fda-pfizer-case/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ordered </a>Wednesday, in Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) v. the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the FDA to provide documents in an expedited fashion, with overall favorable modifications to the prior order, according to an agreement between the FDA and the plaintiff in the case, PHMPT, represented by attorney Aaron Siri.This is a major win for America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) and other doctors fighting for information from the government.The Honorable Mark Pittman entered an order that requires the FDA to produce 10,000 pages of documents between it and Pfizer on or before March 1st, 10,000 more by April 1st, followed by another 80,000 pages each on May 1st, June 1st, and July 1st, then 70,000 pages on August 1st, followed by 55,000 pages a month on the first day of each month. Attorney Siri also negotiated a significant concession from the FDA that leads to a greater production of data per page to ensure duplicates do not cut into the page production.&nbsp;&nbsp;The FDA had sought to delay until May 1st the release of 55,000 pages of documents, which it had been previously <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/files/order-fda-pfizer-case-fort-worth/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ordered</a> to produce on March 1st.AFLDS had gone to court January 28, 2022 with doctors from all over the country to show support for the lawsuit against the FDA to obtain documents and against Pfizer’s motion to intervene, the latter which the judge has not ruled on yet. AFLDS has been fighting for more than a year now to give the public the information it needs to make informed decisions. Though the FDA requires informed consent for the EUA to be obtained, the informed consent requirement has been drastically watered down. "People are not being informed of the grave dangers of the vaccine," AFLDS affiliated doctor Dr. John Thomas, who was in the courtroom, emphasized. Dr. Thomas added, "Informed consent means having information about deaths and adverse events, the kind of data Pfizer has and gave to the FDA. The documents the FDA has should tell us a lot."Of the victory and need for information, Dr. Simone Gold stated, "The data is essential, every day that goes by we are in the dark as to what the government knew and relied upon. The data relates to the efficacy of the vaccine, how well it lasts - we know there is waning immunity - how variants evade the vaccine and perhaps, most importantly about how the vaccines do not prevent transmission."Dr. Brian Procter, a doctor affiliated with AFLDS, said, "The significance of the information and the urgency in obtaining it cannot be understated." He added, "Comirnaty is not available in the United States. Information obtained from the FDA, information we are seeking, can only help with giving people the information they need to provide informed consent."The attendance of more than fifteen doctors at the hearing, including Dr. Thomas and Dr. Procter, was essential to drive home to the judge that these are not abstract names on a page but real-life doctors and scientists in this battle to gain information from the government. Dr. Simone Gold noted that many of the doctors had dropped everything on 24-hour notice to be at the hearing because of the importance of this matter to the nation.The Court had given the parties one week to confer and come to an agreement on a revised schedule which allowed the government some room but not as much as they were seeking to produce the documents. The parties settled on an agreement that is a net win for transparency and a win for humanity.

Doctors with America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Successfully Push Back on the FDA in Fight for Documents on the COVID Vaccine 

This past week, the CDC came out with a study revealing the grave consequences associated with the vaccine. The study entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fmmwr%2Fvolumes%2F71%2Fwr%2Fmm7104e1.htm&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cevan%40aflds.org%7C7cbdf5b0a08c4b1c250508d9e115db1f%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637788306265239514%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=r3x6FMy60G2XD52nRg9XXXeHLa5qBRm6LHZ43N9NOfc%3D&amp;reserved=0">COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations by COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Previous COVID-19 Diagnosis – California and New York, May-November 2021</a>&nbsp;is being reported in terms of two major headlines. One is that the vaccination provides protection from severe illness and death. The other is that the COVID recovered, or those who had prior infection, have longer-lasting immunity. A third and related headline is that the vaccination is actually weakening the immune system.America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Associate Medical Director Dan Stock, stated, "This week's CDC study was supportive of what we've been saying for quite some time. The Covid vaccinated are at risk, and the Covid recovered are largely well protected."The study found that those who received the vaccination have a reduced risk of severe illness and death, yet they have waning immunity. The implication is that they will require boosters to have ongoing protection. At the same time, those who have had COVID and recovered have longer-lasting immunity and so are protected to a greater degree.While the study, which looked at approximately 1.1 million California and New York hospitalization cases, cases which occurred before the omicron variant arose, is being reported in terms of these two main issues, there is the varying emphasis being given to the study’s findings, in an ongoing battle between two groups, the CDC and the major media outlets and those such as America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) and numerous other doctors. This weekend, the March for Freedom was held on the Washington Mall in D.C. with numerous doctors in attendance. Dr. Richard Urso, speaking on the Mall, stated, “We are not one doctor, we are 17,000 doctors!” Many of the doctors who spoke this weekend before a crowd of more than 15,000, standing in the D.C. cold for hours, emphasized the point that the COVID recovered fare better than the vaccinated. Dr. Urso, for example, stated “Natural immunity has always fared better than a vaccination and we’re seeing that here with COVID.”Beyond the longer-lasting value of natural immunity, the harms of vaccination were highlighted by the outspoken doctors. Dr. Ryan Cole, who has been campaigning vigorously to get the truth, and alternative viewpoint, out, for example, have expressed significant concerns that&nbsp;the immune system is being weakened by the vaccine. Similarly, Dr. Peter McCullough noted the science that is being undervalued in the mainstream, “There are two preclinical papers suggesting that the vaccination could actually impair long-term natural immunity” if you are infected with the virus.As one would expect, CNN reported the slant on the CDC study one would&nbsp;expect. It considers the findings of the study to be that vaccination is the clear winner. “It shows once again that vaccination is superior to prior infection,” stated Elizabeth Cohen, Sr. Medical Correspondent in her reporting on CNN. It bases that conclusion on a view that the purpose of a vaccination is to prevent severe illness and death. However, the doctors, and numerous others not present, at the Washington Mall this weekend, note that traditionally the purpose of vaccination is to prevent infection and transmission, which, as Dr. Christina Parks, told AFLDS at the March for Freedom,&nbsp;“just doesn’t happen from the COVID-19 vaccines.”Dr. Parks added of the ongoing risks to the vaccinated, “The vaxxed will continue to be susceptible to each new strain of SARS-CoV-2 no matter how many times they get it.”Of course, CNN received millions of dollars in advertising revenue from Pfizer and so it’s reasonable to conclude that there is an interest in their slant. Admittedly, CNN did report the stark findings of the CDC study that&nbsp;“as vaccines waned, without boosters, prior infection [is] more effective at preventing infection,” but it downplayed the importance of this aspect of the study. Further, it did not recognize the implication asserted by numerous doctors making a clarion call this weekend that more and more boosters will be needed for the vaccinated.Dr. Simone Gold reached out for a comment stating, stated, “I was inspired by the concerned and caring citizens and outspoken doctors who turned out at the March for Freedom rally. The pandemic has created a threat to humanity which good doctors are opposing. The pandemic has created a quandary for doctors, placing them under immense pressure to lie, distort and tow a line, while it’s clear from the latest study that there are balances to be struck and immense dangers that cannot and should not be ignored, threatening the lives of countless. We need to restore integrity to our system.”

CDC Study Bears out Concerns of Doctors and Medical Experts: Natural Immunity is Superior to Vaccination Immunity

Washington, DC—On January 13, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court in a 6-3 per curiam <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a244_hgci.pdf">decision</a> struck down the OSHA mandate requiring businesses with greater than 100 employees to mandate their employees be vaccinated or tested. The court had heard oral arguments on January 7, 2022.&nbsp;Today’s ruling strikes down the Biden Administration’s rule, and the Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS), on the basis that the Secretary of Labor “lacked authority to impose the mandate” and the Applicants are “likely to succeed on the merits of their claim.” Crucial to the decision was the Court’s conclusion that OSHA had gone beyond its scope of authority by issuing a rule that governs “public health” not “workplace safety.” The court stated, “Although COVID-19 is a risk that occurs in many workplaces, it is not an occupational hazard in most.”The Court utilized the major questions doctrine. “Administrative agencies are creatures of statute. They accordingly possess only the authority that Congress has provided.” The opinion highlighted that Congress had not clearly authorized the agency “to exercise powers of vast economic and political significance.”&nbsp;The majority, comprised of the six conservative justices, emphasized the unprecedented power grab: “It is telling that OSHA, in its half century of existence, has never before adopted a broad public health regulation of this kind—addressing a threat that is untethered, in any causal sense, from the workplace. This ‘lack of historical precedent,’ coupled with the breadth of authority that the Secretary now claims, is a ‘telling indication’ that the mandate extends beyond the agency’s legitimate reach.”&nbsp;The Court made clear “COVID–19 can and does spread at home, in schools, during sporting events, and everywhere else that people gather. That kind of universal risk is no different from the day-to-day dangers that all face from crime, air pollution, or any number of communicable diseases. Permitting OSHA to regulate the hazards of daily life—simply because most Americans have jobs and face those same risks while on the clock—would significantly expand OSHA’s regulatory.”The dissent of the liberal justices, Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor, took issue with limiting OSHA’s power to the bounds on one’s occupation, “The statute generally charges OSHA with ‘assur[ing] so far as possible … safe and healthful working conditions.’ That provision authorizes regulation to protect employees from all hazards present in the workplace—or, at least, all hazards in part created by conditions there. It does not matter whether those hazards also exist beyond the workplace walls.”Dr. Simone Gold, founder of AFLDS, physician and attorney, stated, “This is a major win for those who oppose mandates and medical tyranny. The majority placed the power back in the hands of Congress to make such decisions.” AFLDS has been working tirelessly to oppose mandates such as the one opposed at the Supreme Court and ruled on today, including through filing an <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/files/aflds-amicus-brief-4/">amicus curiae brief</a> in this case.Today’s ruling, which affects 84 million Americans, reins in the federal government’s executive branch, and agency power. It is a victory for organizations fighting unlawful mandates. The shock waves should be heard throughout the world. It is another in a line of cases where the Supreme Court has drawn lines, such as <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf">Roman Catholic Diocese v. Cuomo</a> and <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a136_bq7c.pdf">South Bay United Pentacostal Church v. Newsom</a>, limiting the power of the government to mandate by fiat.

 Supreme Court Blocks Biden Administration’s OSHA Mandate – Win for Anti-Mandate Advocates and Employee Rights

Washington, DC—On January 13, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a240_d18e.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">decision</a>, an unsigned opinion, that it would allow the CMS mandate to stand. The court had heard oral arguments on January 7, 2022. Injunctions by Missouri, Louisiana and Texas, which impacted 25 states are now repealed by the ruling.&nbsp;The majority, finding for the Biden Administration, was comprised of the three liberal justices, Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor, and two conservative justices, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh.&nbsp;The majority held that it is part of the Department of Health and Human Services function and core mission “to ensure that the healthcare providers who care for Medicare and Medicaid patients protect their patients’ health and safety.”The majority noted, “Such providers include hospitals, nursing homes, ambulatory surgical centers, hospices, rehabilitation facilities, and more. To that end, Congress authorized the Secretary to promulgate, as a condition of a facility’s participation in the programs, such ‘requirements as [he] finds necessary in the interest of the health and safety of individuals who are furnished services in the institution.’”However, four conservative justices dissented, Justices Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch and Barrett. They each signed two different dissents. In one dissent, Alito stated, “I do not think that the Federal Government is likely to be able to show that Congress has authorized the unprecedented step of compelling over 10,000,000 healthcare workers to be vaccinated on pain of being fired.” In the other dissent, Thomas stated,&nbsp;“These cases are not about the efficacy or importance of COVID–19 vaccines. They are only about whether CMS has the statutory authority to force healthcare workers, by coercing their employers, to undergo a medical procedure they do not want and cannot undo. Because the Government has not made a strong showing that Congress gave CMS that broad authority, I would deny the stays pending appeal. I respectfully dissent.”The Court’s lift of two injunctions which covered more than 10 million health care workers means that workers are required to receive one shot by January 27, 2022 and a second by February 28, 2022. Failure to have less than 100% of employees vaccinated may lead the facilities to be removed from Medicare or Medicaid programs. However, the agency has said that it would provide grace periods to facilities with at least 80% of their staff vaccinated by the January 27, 2022 deadline.The strain on the health care system is sure to be felt. AFLDS's founder, physician and attorney Simone Gold stated, "As critical thinkers will not choose a career that&nbsp;violates their civil liberties, the quality of care will diminish&nbsp;significantly. This disappointing&nbsp;decision highlights the imperative need for affordable, private, patient-centered healthcare without government or payor interference. Patients deserve to know their doctor is unbiased. AFLDS will continue to fight this battle.”&nbsp;This is not the end of the road for the CMS litigation. The court challenges remain, as the ruling addressed the injunction only and was not a ruling on the merits. The cases, if there are conflicting lower court rulings, as might be expected, may be reviewed in the future by the Supreme Court.&nbsp;

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds CMS Mandate

Brooklyn, NY—Access to public places based on discrimination violates NY law even if a pandemic exists, and no such pandemic exists to warrant Mayor de Blasio's overreaching <a href="https://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/005-003/emergency-executive-order-5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Executive Order #5</a>, argued Sheldon Karasik, January 11, 2022 in court, with the support of America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS).AFLDS is challenging de Blasio's unlawful order on the grounds that it has a disparate impact on Blacks, rendering those who choose not to take the vaccine second-class citizens. As Attorney Karasik argued in court, before Judge Francois A. Rivera, in <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Article-78-Petition-090121-5-15-TC1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bravo, et al, v. de Blasio</a>, the government's own study concedes that Blacks are adversely impacted.Karasik cited the state's study, of May 2021, which looked at the concerns that NYC residents have about the vaccine. Among the findings are that 56% of Blacks, as compared to only 32% of Whites, were "very concerned" that they did "not have enough information about the vaccine." Further, 35% of Black residents were "very concerned about missing work due to side effects," as compared to 19% of Whites who were similarly very concerned.Beyond the impacts on Blacks, Karasik challenged the notion that an emergency still exists. "There has to be a factual basis for any kind of emergency order and the fact that a virus could get worse in the future... doesn't provide a factual basis today...," Karasik argued before the Court. The vaccines do not stop the current strain of the virus, Omicron, from being transmitted, nor do they stop any of the COVID-19 viruses from being transmitted, and they don't stop people from being infected."Their own expert Dr. Varma said that it was a lot worse initially when the first state emergency order was issued in March 2020... it's passed now - that was in November with Delta, if it passed in November with Delta, in terms of the emergency...certainly, it's passed even further today with Omicron, and they have to have the factual record. It's their burden to make the factual record. And that's why it's arbitrary and capricious," Attorney Karasik forcefully stated.The oral argument lasted for approximately one and half hours with Attorney Karasik speaking for almost a full hour. Attorney Karasik effectively drove home the point that "Blacks are locked out of society" with this measure when there are far less restrictive means that the government could employ.AFLDS's founder, Dr. Simone Gold noted, "The consequences of not getting the vaccine constitute a deprivation of a liberty right. Attorney Karasik made this point effectively, pointing to Cruzan and the Court's stance that there is a fundamental right to refuse medical treatment. This is a medical treatment, not a vaccine."Karasik posed, "If the vaccine works, then why do we have to exclude the unvaccinated? What threat are they? And if the vaccine doesn't work, then why is the state forcing it?"The government's position is that an emergency can go on indefinitely, along with emergency powers, and there are no less restrictive means than locking the unvaccinated out of public places, though their own expert Dr. Jay Varma notes that masking, social distancing and washing hands are effective, as does Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, plaintiff’s expert. AFLDS Associate Medical Director Dr. Daniel Stock echoed Attorney Karasik's argument that "comparisons to the smallpox pandemic are hollow, because, there, vaccines were effective at stopping transmission during a pandemic that far exceeded the death rate here, associated with COVID." Attorney Karasik pointed out that "even the OSHA Mandate" under review by the Supreme Court, "recognizes medical and religious exemptions, not this, this excludes the world."Dr. Gold added, "This vaccine, which is a treatment, not a vaccine, does not prevent the virus, or the transmission of the virus; it does not immunize someone against the disease. The emergency must end now, before many more lives and livelihoods are destroyed."

America's Frontline Doctors Fights the Discriminatory Impact of the de Blasio Vaccine Mandate, EO #5, on Blacks in NYC

Freedom Fighters Raglan Tee

AFLDS Water bottles

Everything They Told You Is A Lie

CAPITOL PUNISHMENT

This 4th edition updates the brief essays that methodically examine the major Covid-19 issues – vaccines, masks, social distancing, natural immune systems, treatments ― to determine what is fact and what is myth in the current intensely political debate. The book is written by a family physician who pointedly differs on the threat posed by Covid-19 to the American people, then challenges current conventional wisdom on what should be done about the schools, the economy and public activity with reason, honesty and scientific facts.

COVID-19 A Physician&#8217;s Exaggerated Fear

How America Fell Victim to a Mass Delusional Psychosis

America's Premier

Civil Liberties Organization.

Airline CEOs want to lift mask mandates. But do the passengers? w...

Freedom 1, Tyranny 0: NYC mayor breaks on vaccine mandate for athletes...

Conservative comedian trolls Leftists at city council meeting in viral video...

Breaking News

Airline CEOs want to lift mask mandates. But do the passengers? w

Freedom 1, Tyranny 0: NYC mayor breaks on vaccine mandate for athletes

Conservative comedian trolls Leftists at city council meeting in viral video

A Call to Action from
Dr. Simone Gold

Frontline News

Airline CEOs want to lift mask mandates. But do the passengers? w

Freedom 1, Tyranny 0: NYC mayor breaks on vaccine mandate for athletes

Conservative comedian trolls Leftists at city council meeting in viral video

Former Helsinki Committee member speaks out against Israel’s medical experimentation

McDonald: Taking accountability

The revolution against wokeness has begun

Social media platform now bans users for what they say off-platform

Press Releases

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

AFLDS Statement

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Takes Aim at The Intercept

Doctors with America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Successfully Push Back on the FDA in Fight for Documents on the COVID Vaccine

CDC Study Bears out Concerns of Doctors and Medical Experts: Natural Immunity is Superior to Vaccination Immunity

Supreme Court Blocks Biden Administration’s OSHA Mandate – Win for Anti-Mandate Advocates and Employee Rights

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds CMS Mandate

America's Frontline Doctors Fights the Discriminatory Impact of the de Blasio Vaccine Mandate, EO #5, on Blacks in NYC

How To Obtain Covid-19 Medication

Wear Freedom

Proudly

What's freedom
worth to you?

Support the cause

America's Premier

Civil Liberties Organization.

Airline CEOs want to lift mask mandates. But do the passengers? w...

Freedom 1, Tyranny 0: NYC mayor breaks on vaccine mandate for athletes...

Conservative comedian trolls Leftists at city council meeting in viral video...

Breaking News

Airline CEOs want to lift mask mandates. But do the passengers? w

Freedom 1, Tyranny 0: NYC mayor breaks on vaccine mandate for athletes

Conservative comedian trolls Leftists at city council meeting in viral video

A Call to Action from.css-qa8l2m{color:var(--chakra-colors-primary-500);}Dr. Simone Gold

Frontline News

Airline CEOs want to lift mask mandates. But do the passengers? w

Freedom 1, Tyranny 0: NYC mayor breaks on vaccine mandate for athletes

Conservative comedian trolls Leftists at city council meeting in viral video

Former Helsinki Committee member speaks out against Israel’s medical experimentation

McDonald: Taking accountability

The revolution against wokeness has begun

Social media platform now bans users for what they say off-platform

Press Releases

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

AFLDS Statement

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Takes Aim at The Intercept

Doctors with America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Successfully Push Back on the FDA in Fight for Documents on the COVID Vaccine

CDC Study Bears out Concerns of Doctors and Medical Experts: Natural Immunity is Superior to Vaccination Immunity

Supreme Court Blocks Biden Administration’s OSHA Mandate – Win for Anti-Mandate Advocates and Employee Rights

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds CMS Mandate

America's Frontline Doctors Fights the Discriminatory Impact of the de Blasio Vaccine Mandate, EO #5, on Blacks in NYC

How To Obtain Covid-19 Medication

Wear Freedom

Proudly

What's freedom .css-551n9x{display:inline;color:var(--chakra-colors-primary-500);}worth to you?

Support the cause

A Call to Action from
Dr. Simone Gold

What's freedom
worth to you?