IRRESPONSIBLE OR CRIMINAL? MRNA INJECTIONS
As discussed in the previous Policy Statement titled “Gene Transfer Technology- You Are the Experiment”, the practice of gene-transfer technology is concerning. It is constantly evolving and should be tested and regulated, if practiced at all.
CLINICAL TRIALS CONDUCTED WITH NO OVERSIGHT
Brook Jackson alleges Pfizer was conducting fake clinical trials for its “vaccines.” She says that people who worked at a taco stand were injecting patients. Brook Jackson conducted research for Pfizer as a regional manager of Ventavia Research Group. She was responsible for the management of the protocols in 2 different Texas facilities.
Jackson has publicly spoken out about the practices at several of Pfizer’s “vaccine” trial sites. She reports that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, violated temperature control requirements for the product, provided inadequate post-injection care, and failed to responsibly report adverse effects of the injections in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trials. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems found. Jackson made several attempts over her two weeks of working for the organization to report poor laboratory management, safety concerns for the patients, and data integrity issues. Jackson eventually emailed a complaint to the FDA and was fired the same day.
After her complaints were continuously ignored, Jackson eventually sued Pfizer.
On March 31, 2023, Jackson’s case was dismissed by Judge Truncale due to the fact that Pfizer’s trials were not subject to FDA regulations because of a legal agreement between Pfizer and the Department of Defense (OTA-more below).
As unethical as it is, there IS a legal agreement between Pfizer and the Department of Defense that exempts Pfizer from federal regulatory oversight.
Sasha Latypova, former FDA/EMA pharmaceutical industry regulations committee member and founder of several medical companies, claims that the COVID injections are part of a military program that has suspended all safety rules and regulations worldwide. “They are colluding with these pharmaceutical manufacturers to drive these deadly products throughout the world.”
Latypova goes on to say that the biggest lie about the “vaccines” is that they are vaccines. She says they are not even pharmaceuticals. “All of the public was told that this is a medicine - a vaccine- everybody’s expectation was that, you know, all of these safeguards that we are used to for medicines, they’re in place…and they were not, and they do not actually even legally apply to these products,” Latypova points out.
WHAT IS OTA AND WHY IT IS IMPORTANT
In 2015, The Obama administration worked with Congress to pass the National Defense Authorization Act. This Act allows for The Department of Defense to conduct transactions such as entering into contracts, cooperative agreements, and grants without oversight. They call this Other Transaction Authority (OTA). OTA provides a loophole that allows the Department of Defense to enter into contracts with pharmaceutical companies.
The OTA federal contract program then made way for the creation of the Medical Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear (CBRN) Defense Consortium known as MCDC. MCDC openly states on their website that “The Medical CBRN Defense Consortium (MCDC) was formed in response to the Government’s expressed interest to establish an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) with an eligible entity or group of entities, to include industry, academic, and not-for-profit partners, for advanced development efforts to support the Department of Defense’s (DoD) medical, pharmaceutical and diagnostic requirements as related to enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel.” They boast of the flexibility for better private and public collaboration and state clearly that the partnership “OPERATES OUTSIDE THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS.”
The final statement is clearly admitting that Pfizer’s partnership with our government is not subject to regulations. Pfizer participates as a member of the MCDC, which allowed the multi-million-dollar sale of the COVID injections to the Department of Defense.
So, why was the Department of Defense getting involved in a health crisis and initiating contracts that allowed them to evade regulatory oversight? Is their involvement an admittance that they knew COVID was a bioweapon? Is that why The Department of Defense (DOD) did OTA contracts worth millions of dollars with Pfizer for the COVID injections?
THE FOUNDATION WAS WELL PLANNED
It turns out that the groundwork that allowed the lack of regulation of the COVID “vaccines” has been decades in the making.
The FDA has a program called Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MDMi) This is the FDA branch of the US Government’s public-private program governing the use of biological and chemical weapons.
The term “medical countermeasures” was first used in 1993 in Title 10 in Section 2370a. It was a reaction to biowarfare threats. It is among the first pieces of legislation addressing bioweapons. This was later repealed, but before it was repealed in Title 10 for the Armed Forces, it was put in Title 42 for the public. It continues to be expanded.
Key steps in the march toward unregulated biologics that have the potential to be used as bioweapons include:
Allowing the use of previously unapproved therapies and diagnostics Congress and President Clinton passed the Food and Drug Modernization Act on November 21, 1997. This Act allowed for therapies and diagnostics that were previously unapproved to be implemented. Katherine Watt, a paralegal and researcher in biological weapons, goes as far as to say, “The Emergency Use Authorization program under 21 USC 360 bbb, correctly titled, would be ‘expanded production and deployment of illegal and prohibited weapons’.”  The ideal participant in these studies would be terminally ill patients that had tried other forms of treatment that did not cure their disease. However, there is no legal requirement that only those that meet these criteria participate in these experiments. Thus, the potential is there for these treatments and therapies to be used more widely, such as the development and use of gene-transfer “vaccines.”
Allowing unauthorized medical products to be used in an emergency On November 24, 2003, President Bush and Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act for FY20004, adding 21 USC 360bbb-3. The “Authorization for Medical Products for Use in Emergencies” allows for medical products that would otherwise be unauthorized to be implemented if the government declares an emergency.
Allowing previously illegal biological research to be conducted As part of the Public Health and Medical Preparedness and Response Functions, in 2004, the Bush administration worked with Congress and passed the Project Bioshield Act. This act gives “Authority for use of certain procedures regarding qualified countermeasure research and development activities”. This paves the way for biological research that was previously illegal.
WHAT THIS ALL MEANS
It is very clear that loopholes in the law and in regulatory oversight have been created in a way that has basically allowed unregulated experimentation on the human race.
Has this been the plan since the first terminology of “medical countermeasures” in 1993?
Is the use of “medical countermeasures” without proper oversight a means intended to protect people from the effects of biological warfare OR is it a means of waging biological warfare?
Whichever scenario may be the case, we do know that it never made sense that the government, armed with the media, created a hysteria over a disease with a 99.9% survival rate. It defied common sense that they strangulated every effort to bring to light treatments that WERE being shown to be both safe and effective , such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
Were these bills put in place over the last few decades part of a bigger plan to institute biological weapons? Is it possible we have been infiltrated by our enemies and war has been declared on us through weapons of mass destruction?
WHAT IS THE PREP ACT AND WHY IS IT IMPORTANT
While The Department of Defense appears to be running the COVID “vaccine” program, with Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies acting as their puppets, it’s clear that they have secured their actions through the PREP Act.
Jackson’s attorney, Warner Mendenhall, says that Pfizer is getting away with the lack of regulations under The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP).
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (Secretary) to issue a PREP Act declaration. The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims:
• of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions
• determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency
• to entities and individuals involved in the development, manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of such countermeasures.
The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), stemming from the PREP Act, automatically institutes the regulatory (or lack of regulatory) guidelines of the EA program. Coupled with the OTA program, it has created a situation in which there is NO regulatory oversight AND there is NO liability for those involved in this “vaccination” program. Basically, they have created the perfect recipe for enabling mass experimentation without regulations.
SINISTER INJECTIONS DEMAND ACCOUNTABILTY
Gene-transfer technology is alarming, and many consider it dangerous. The lack of oversight or regulation (due to OTA) of such a problematic technology is abhorrent, at best, and the lack of liability (due to EUA) is criminal.
It is important to note that the criminal laws applicable here are still enforceable. Second degree murder, manslaughter, negligent homicide, negligent injuring, practicing medicine without a license, and criminal conspiracy are among just a few of the possibilities according to the criteria for these crimes.
THE GOOD NEWS
The good news is that there are still legal remedies and laws available, despite all the loopholes passed. There are claims that the U.S. District Attorneys and U.S. Sheriffs are working together to criminally charge those involved. Racketeering, collusion, premeditated mass murder by COVID-19, remdesivir and the “vaccines” are among the charges being sought against those who have perpetrated this crime against humanity.
Americans are waking up and there are remedies available to lessen side effects for both COVID and for those that have been inoculated. We must be bold and never give into propaganda from those that mean us harm. Super spreaders of truth must continue to do just that. Save the human race. Spread truth.
As for Brook Jackson’s attorneys, they are planning their appeal.