<h2 id="">September 16th Sovereignty Summit to prevent UN power grab</h2><p id="">The <a href="https://sovereigntycoalition.org/" target="_blank" id="">Sovereignty Coalition</a> will hold its third <a href="https://sovereigntysummit.org/the-sovereignty-summit-3/" id="">Sovereignty Summit</a> from 11:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. ET, on Monday, September 16, 2024. This summitis focusing on the UN’s ”Pact for the Future,” designed to wrest power from individual nations in the event of a UN-deemed crisis.&nbsp;</p><h3 id="">WHO's "Pandemic Treaty"</h3><p id="">Reggie Littlejohn, JD, has been at the forefront of an initiative to stop the United States from signing on to the WHO’s pandemic treaty. Her organization “Women’s Rights Without Frontiers” partnered with the Center for Security Policy to form the Sovereignty Coalition to defeat the WHO’s pandemic treaty and IHR amendments that would provide the world body with power grab. The House of Representatives has passed a bill preventing the president from signing an executive order that would bar any president from unilaterally signing a WHO pandemic treaty, binding the country to the WHO, as Breiitbart’s&nbsp; Frances Martel <a href="https://www.breitbart.com/health/2024/09/12/house-passes-bill-stop-white-house-unilaterally-imposing-who-pandemic-treaty/" id="">wrote</a>:</p><blockquote id=""><em id="">The “No W.H.O. Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act,” introduced by Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-WI) in 2023, is a response to efforts beginning in 2021, at the height of the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic, to create some form of international binding legal document, spearheaded by the W.H.O., regulating how nations handle international health emergencies, including pandemics.</em></blockquote><p id="">While the Constitution bars a president from unilaterally signing a treaty, the WHO has called the document a “convention” or agreement, among other names. This bill would prevent a president from signing any such document no matter what it is called.&nbsp; </p><blockquote id=""><em id="">While the constitution requires all treaties, defined as binding agreements with foreign powers, to be passed through a two-thirds vote in the Senate, the bill in question is a safeguard prompted by the fact that the parties drafting the proposed “pandemic treaty” cannot even agree on what to call the document. The U.N. health agency is currently </em><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/pandemic-prevention--preparedness-and-response-accord" id=""><em id="">describing</em></a><em id=""> the draft document as the “W.H.O. convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response,” or “WHO CA+.”</em></blockquote><p id="">This is not yet law as it has not passed in the Senate and, in any case, would face a veto by Joe Biden.</p><h3 id="">UN’s "Pact for the Future" as dangerous as pandemic treaty</h3><p id="">Now the US faces another globalist takeover, this time from the United Nations, the WHO’s parent agency. Under the auspices of an organization she founded to resist the WEF’s “Global Reset,” <a href="https://www.antiglobalist.net/" id="">Anti-Globalist International</a>, Littlejohn <a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1726487495/UN_Emergency_Power_Grab_Briefing_Updated_91224_PDF_2_503174df2f.pdf" id="">penned</a> a memo entitled "United Nations Pact for the Future – An 'Emergency Platform' to Seize Global Power.”&nbsp; She wrote,&nbsp;</p><blockquote id=""><em id="">The UN “Summit of the Future” is set to take place on September 22 to 23, at the UN headquarters in New York City. Just as the World Health Organization seeks to create a global, bio-tech surveillance police state in case of a “pandemic emergency,” the UN Secretary-General seeks similar powers in case of “complex global shocks,” through a new instrument entitled, “Pact for the Future.” This Pact is slated to be adopted at the Summit of the Future. The Pact is equally dangerous to our national sovereignty and personal freedom as the WHO’s proposed pandemic treaty, and yet the UN’s power grab is virtually unknown.&nbsp;</em></blockquote><p id="">Under the heading “Pact for the Future,” she continues,</p><blockquote id=""><em id="">As of September 11, 2024, the latest publicly available draft (i.e., Revision 3) of the Pact for the Future contains Section 5, entitled “Transforming Global Governance,” which includes a commitment in Action 57 to “Strengthen the International Response to Complex Global Shocks.” This action item would entail the United Nations playing “the central role” of responding to complex global shocks. It makes the seemingly benign request that “the Secretary-General . . . present for the consideration of Member States protocols for convening and operationalizing emergency platforms based on flexible approaches to respond to a range of different complex global shocks . . .”&nbsp;</em></blockquote><blockquote id="">. . . Policy Brief #2 is entitled, “Strengthening the Response to Complex Global Shocks.” It contains the following statement: Building on the ideas in Our Common Agenda and learning lessons from these recent crises,<strong id=""> I propose that the General Assembly provide the Secretary-General and the United Nations system with a standing authority to convene and operationalize automatically an Emergency Platform in the event of a future complex global shock of sufficient scale, severity and reach.</strong> (Page 12, emphasis in the original.)</blockquote><p id="">‍</p><p id="">The brief includes some of the foreseeable shocks, which she lists: </p><blockquote id=""><em>This same Policy Brief contains (on pages 5- 6) a chart entitled “Possible Future Complex Global Shocks” and a list of such shocks. It indicates that such shocks would include virtually every aspect of civilized life and reach even into outer space:&nbsp;</em></blockquote><blockquote id=""><em>a) Large-scale climatic or environmental events that cause major socioeconomic disruptions and/or environmental degradation;&nbsp;<br>b) Future pandemics with cascading secondary impacts;&nbsp;<br>c) High-impact events involving a biological agent (deliberate or accidental);&nbsp;<br>d) Events leading to disruptions to global flows of goods, people or finance;<br>&nbsp;e) Large-scale destructive and/or disruptive activity in cyberspace or disruptions to global digital connectivity;&nbsp;<br>f) A major event in outer space that causes severe disruptions to one or several critical systems on Earth; and&nbsp;<br>‍</em><em id="">g) Unforeseen risks (“black swan” events).</em></blockquote><blockquote id="">...&nbsp;</blockquote><blockquote id=""><em id="">The only way to stop the adoption of the Pact for the Future on September 22 – 23 is urgently to raise the visibility of this issue, nationally and internationally. The most effective way to do this is for heads of state, political candidates, legislators, parliamentarians, non-profit organizations and citizen activists to take up the issue and sound the alarm, demanding robust international debate on these issues rather than adoption by stealth under the Silence Procedure. Only in this way can this nefarious plot be thwarted.</em></blockquote><p id="">In Take A Stand’s tweet below, the Sovereignty Coalition’s Frank Gaffney, founder and president of the Center for Security Policy, <a href="https://hicloud.zoevive.workers.dev/experts/667-frank-gaffney" target="_blank" id="">speaks</a> with Littlejohn about the pact. Littlejohn, @1:22, explains how the UN is maneuvering to have the pact approved:</p><blockquote id=""><em id="">This United Nation’s ability to operational and automatically in emergency platform, basically telling the world what to do in case of an emergency that they declare, absolutely changes the character of the United Nations. It was never meant to be a governing organization and hey are doing this through a thing called a silence procedure, as opposed to out in the open and debating it and having a vote.</em></blockquote><div data-rt-embed-type='true'><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The United Nations is making a power move to become the One World Government via the Pact for the Future. <br><br>They have rewritten their role for the world, so that about any event allows the U.N. to automatically take control operationally across the world.<br> <br>Apparently, since the… <a href="https://t.co/ytOM6y2FuP">pic.twitter.com/ytOM6y2FuP</a></p>&mdash; 🇺🇲Take a Stand 🇺🇲🙏 (@keepitwilder) <a href="https://twitter.com/keepitwilder/status/1835023983110242395?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 14, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><p id="">‍</p><p id="">The Sovereignty Coalition has <a href="https://sovereigntycoalition.org/release-sovereignty-summit-to-expose-biden-harris-stealth-imposition-of-world-government/" target="_blank" id="">called</a> for a requirement of Senate approval of the "morphing UN charter" before the US commits to that morphing. Just as a bill has been put forth that would require Senate approval of any WHO-related agreement or treaty that the president may want to sign, so too, the Coalition is calling for a bill that would put approval of a treaty or agreement with the UN in the hands of the Senate, since the "Pact of the Future" oversteps the bounds of the UN's authority. As explained in the Coalition's &nbsp;press release,</p><blockquote id=""><em>The plan is to use &nbsp;the “Summit of the Future” on September 22-23 effectively to amend the UN’s Charter in order to fundamentally transform the organization from an entity designed to foster cooperation and – where deemed desirable by member nations – collaborative action into an institution of full-on world government.</em></blockquote><p id="">‍</p><p id=""><strong id="">Related articles:</strong></p><ul id=""><li id="">Emergency response or planned takeover? WHO Pandemic Treaty</li><li id="">WHO no longer needs a pandemic to declare one</li><li id="">Deadly pandemics are rare, so why is the WHO obsessed with them?</li><li id="">Don’tjust reject the Pandemic Treaty – Get US Out! Of the WHO</li></ul><p id="">‍</p>

Sovereignty Summit today to block UN 'Pact for the Future,' a power grab as dangerous as the WHO Pandemic Treaty

US independence could be curtailed by any 'possible future complex global shock'

<p id="">Media operatives are blaming President Donald Trump for the second assassination attempt on his life.</p><p id="">Secret Service apprehended 58-year-old Democrat Ryan Routh on Sunday after he fled Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach, where he had placed a rifle, a GoPro, and two backpacks. Trump was present on the golf course at the time.</p><p id="">The assassination attempt is the second on Trump’s life in two months. On July 13th, Thomas Crooks shot Trump in the face during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, grazing the president’s ear.</p><h2 id="">NBC blames Trump’s ‘fierce rhetoric’</h2><p id="">On Sunday, mainstream media outlets blamed Trump for his near death. <em id="">NBC</em> anchor Lester Holt suggested it was punishment for Trump and his running mate JD Vance speaking out against a migrant surge in Ohio.</p><p id="">“Today’s apparent assassination attempt comes amid increasingly fierce rhetoric on the campaign trail itself. Mr. Trump, his running mate JD Vance continue to make baseless claims about Haitian immigrants in Ohio,” Holt said, adding: “This weekend there were new bomb threats in that town.”</p><div data-rt-embed-type='true'><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NBC&#39;s Lester Holt: &quot;Today&#39;s apparent assassination attempt comes amid increasingly fierce rhetoric on the campaign trail. Mr. Trump, his running mate JD Vance continue to make baseless claims about Haitian immigrants&quot; in Springfield, Ohio, resulting in bomb threats. <a href="https://t.co/apw9WQ1liR">pic.twitter.com/apw9WQ1liR</a></p>&mdash; Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) <a href="https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1835449928136462361?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><h2 id="">MSNBC blames Trump’s ‘rhetoric’ and ‘violence’</h2><p id="">Meanwhile, <em id="">MSNBC </em>blamed Trump for causing the assassination attempt through “rhetoric” and “violence.”</p><p id="">“Do you expect to hear anything from the Trump campaign about toning down the rhetoric, toning down the violence, or would that be atypical of the former president?” <em id="">MSNBC </em>anchor Alex Witt asked the outlet’s political contributor Elise Jordan.&nbsp;</p><p id="">“Well, Alex, remember back to the assassination attempt from President Trump’s life how there was talk of a new tone and the Republican convention was, by Trumpian standards, muted and it did seem like he was trying to take it down a few notches, then by the end of his convention speech, we were back to where we started, so I don’t know how long this moment of unity for the country where we come together and we say I don’t want any political opposition to be under threat of violence,” Jordan responded.</p><div data-rt-embed-type='true'><script>!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");</script>

<div id="rumble_v5crs0d"></div>
<script>
Rumble("play", {"video":"v5crs0d","div":"rumble_v5crs0d"});</script></div><h2 id="">ABC blamed Trump’s ‘rhetoric’ for first assassination attempt</h2><p id="">The day after Trump was shot in July, media outlets had also rushed to blame him.</p><p id="">“President Trump and his supporters have contributed to this violent rhetoric as well,” <em id="">ABC</em>’s George Stephanopoulos said.</p><p id="">“Absolutely, George, we were just looking back this morning to some of the things that former President Trump has said. He warned last March of potential death and destruction if he were charged by the Manhattan District Attorney: ‘Our country is being destroyed as they tell us to be peaceful,’” Stephanopoulos’ co-host Martha Raddatz responded. “Trump in January warned of bedlam in the country if the criminal charges against him succeeded. And of course, in March, he said, ‘If I don’t get elected, it’s a bloodbath for the whole, and that is the least of it, and it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That will be the least of it.’ He said he was partly joking and that that was taken out of context, but those are, indeed, his words.”</p><p id="">Trump’s “bloodbath” remark was concerning auto industry jobs, but media outlets omit that context to portray him as violent.</p><p id="">‍</p>

Mainstream media blame Trump for latest assassination attempt

News outlets coordinate narrative on Trump's 'rhetoric'

<p id=""><em id="">Eva Rinaldi, CC BY-SA 2.0 &lt;https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0&gt;, via Wikimedia Commons</em></p><p id="">‍</p><p id="">Superstar Taylor Swift’s endorsement last week of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris may not have had the intended effect.</p><p id="">“I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election,” Swift told her 284 million followers. “I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them. I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos. I was so heartened and impressed by her selection of running mate @timwalz, who has been standing up for LGBTQ+ rights, IVF, and a woman’s right to her own body for decades.”</p><p id="">She then told her audience, “Your research is all yours to do, and the choice is yours to make.”</p><h2 id="">20% of voters less likely to vote Harris</h2><p id="">According to a <a href="https://ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/documents/Reactions_to_Harris_Trump_Debate_poll_results.pdf#page=6" id="">YouGov poll</a>, 5% of voters said they were much more likely to vote for Harris following the pop star’s endorsement, with 3% saying they were somewhat more likely.</p><p id="">However, 20% of voters said they were less likely to vote for Harris after the singer’s post, including 18% who said they were much less likely.</p><h2 id="">Taylor Swift: A government psyop?</h2><p id="">If popular claims about Taylor Swift being a US government-led influence operation are true, these numbers are a major disappointment for the intelligence community.</p><p id="">The belief <a href="https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_us_021424/" id="">shared</a> by one-fifth of Americans that Swift is a government tool being used to promote a political agenda is in part based on a video of an August 2019 NATO conference. The footage shows an operative from the Pentagon’s Psychological Operations Unit giving a presentation in which she floated Swift as a “social influence” asset to disseminate propaganda.</p><p id="">“The idea is that social influence can help encourage or promote behavior change . . . so potentially as like a peaceful information operation,” said the presenter. “I’ve included Taylor Swift in here because she’s a fairly influential online person, I don’t know if you’ve heard of her,” she added.</p><p id="">Swift, who until then had largely refrained from publicly taking political stances, soon began to espouse the globalist agenda. Through her music, she started to promote gender ideology. In addition to being an outspoken feminist, she strongly criticized white people for their race and publicly accused President Trump of “stoking the fires of white supremacy and racism.” She has been active against Israel, even attending an anti-Israel benefit following the October 7th massacre last year.</p><p id="">But Swift’s establishment ties extend further. Last year, the pop star entered into a relationship with football star Travis Kelce, a tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs. Kelce, who has refused to stand for the national anthem at football games, is a paid spokesman for Pfizer and has been featured in commercials promoting the COVID-19 vaccine. Kelce’s $20 million <a href="https://thesportsrush.com/nfl-news-travis-kelce-making-6-million-more-with-pfizer-ads-than-his-annual-nfl-salary-shocks-football-fans-no-wonder-aaron-rodgers-is-pissed/" id="">deal</a> with Pfizer is $6 million more than his annual salary.</p><h2 id="">Swift withholds her endorsement</h2><p id="">A staunch supporter of the Democratic Party, Swift has not only weighed in on presidential races but has even endorsed Democratic candidates in congressional races. California Governor Gavin Newsom said last year that Swift’s influence on the 2024 general election will be “profoundly powerful.”</p><p id=""><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/29/us/politics/biden-trump-election-taylor-swift.html" id="">According</a> to the <em id="">New York Times, </em>the Biden campaign was desperate for Swift’s endorsement. But in the 14 months of the campaign’s lifetime, Swift never gave it. Somehow, the timing worked out that Biden never received that endorsement, while his replacement did.</p><p id="">‍</p>

Psyop backfire? 20% of voters less likely to vote Harris after Swift endorsement, poll shows

Why did Swift withhold her 2024 endorsement until Kamala Harris replaced Joe Biden?

<p id="">Under the guise of “helping” parents deal with stress, the Biden administration is plotting a dramatic expansion of government into the home. In short, federal authorities are seeking to take on even more responsibilities traditionally associated with the family while drugging ever larger numbers of Americans.</p><figure id="" class="w-richtext-figure-type-video w-richtext-align-center" style="padding-bottom:33.75%" data-rt-type="video" data-rt-align="center" data-rt-max-width="" data-rt-max-height="33.75%" data-rt-dimensions="0:0" data-page-url=""><div id=""><iframe src="https://subsplash.com/+78fw/embed/mi/+xsywx4m?audio&video&shareable&embeddable" frameborder="0"></iframe></div></figure><p id="">Critics, though, are sounding the alarm. Among other concerns, opponents are warning of a government power grab underway that seeks to further empower the state and undermine the nuclear family. The real answer to stress, they say, is strong marriages and Godly living.</p><p id="">In <a href="https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/parents-under-pressure.pdf" id="">the bizarre new report</a> by Biden-appointed Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, the senior “health” bureaucrat classifies parental stress levels as a major “public health” problem. And of course, with “public health” excuses (think Covid) comes the presumption that government “solutions” are required, and traditional limits on power are to be discarded.</p><p id="">Among the unconstitutional recommendations offered by Murthy: more tax-funded mental-health screenings for parents, more tax-funded drugs (and more tax-funded profits for Big Pharma), more taxpayer-funded “childcare” programs, more taxpayer-funded “cash assistance,” and more tax-funded mandates for companies. &nbsp; &nbsp;</p><p id="">The Biden administration’s fingerprints are all over the report. As Axios put it, “some of the remedies dovetail with Vice President Kamala Harris’ economic plan.” Politico, meanwhile, noted that the recommendations such as universal tax-funded pre-K were “in line with Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ campaign pitch.”</p><p id="">Murthy painted taking people’s money and spending it for them as an “investment” in them. “As a country, we need to invest more in caring for … parents and supporting their well-being,” he said without explaining how parents coped with life before he arrived. “My hope is that the well-being of parents would not be a political or partisan issue.”</p><p id="">The report also tries to use parental stress to promote other totalitarian-inspired policies on unrelated issues. For example, according to Murthy, being worried about “gun violence” is a significant source of stress. And gun violence itself has been dubbed a “public health” problem, so the math is simple: Government must act!</p><p id="">Unsurprisingly, the Biden administration’s solution is not to go back to the days before school shootings when firearms were ubiquitous but when children still learned about God, the Ten Commandments, the Bible, and the value of life. Instead, civilian disarmament is the order of the day.</p><p id="">“Behind this youth mental health crisis is a real crisis with parents, where many of them are struggling with profound stress and with their own mental health challenges,” Murthy was quoted as saying by. “If you really want to help kids, one of the things you’ve got to do is actually help parents.”</p><p id="">Murthy bases his conclusions about parental stress on findings by researchers at the far-left American Psychological Association. The group has become a leading promoter of castrating boys and giving girls hysterectomies and double-mastectomies under the guise of “gender-affirming care,” among other crimes against humanity. &nbsp;</p><p id="">One of the major stressors affecting parents, according to Murthy and his report, is financial security. According to Murthy, parents are increasingly struggling to pay their bills and that makes them stressed. But that should hardly be surprising.</p><p id="">With inflation (theft by the Federal Reserve) eating away at peoples’ purchasing power, government waging war on productive industries and energy, and taxes (at the local, state, and federal level) consuming well over half of everything Americans produce, it is primarily government that is causing parents (and non-parents) to be stressed about finances.</p><p id="">But this agenda is not new, even though the excuse may be. In <a href="https://thenewamerican.com/us/culture/family/feds-seek-home-visits-calling-parents-equal-partners/" id="">a policy brief</a> put out by the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in Barack Obama’s final year, the federal government called for parents and governments to be “equal partners” in raising children.</p><p id="">The United Nations, meanwhile, is pushing to have government become the primary arbiter of what is in the “best interest” of children—and to act accordingly. In response to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Scottish government created a program where <a href="https://thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/citing-un-treaty-scotland-assigns-overseer-to-every-child/" id="">every child gets a personal named bureaucrat to oversee their upbringing from birth</a>.</p><p id="">As President Ronald Reagan warned at a 1986 press conference, “the nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government, and I’m here to help’.” Reagan also pointed out that “government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.” He is right on both counts — especially here.</p><figure id="" class="w-richtext-figure-type-image " data-rt-type="image" data-rt-align=""><div id=""><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66450044188dfe741d77c31e/66c48379c2e05e476426cf76_3364780_1225x377_2500.jpeg" alt="" width="auto" height="auto" loading="auto" id=""></div></figure><p id="">What American parents need is not more government programs and drugs funded by their own taxes or more “childcare” schemes to have the state take care of their children. What they really need is strong marriages, strong families, and biblical wisdom — all of which the government has been waging war on for generations. The government should get out. &nbsp; </p><p>‍</p><p id=""><a href="https://libertysentinel.org/author/admin/" id="">Alex Newman</a> is an award-winning international journalist, educator, author, and consultant who co-wrote the book “Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children.” He writes for diverse publications in the United States and abroad. Originally published at<a href="https://libertysentinel.org/fbi-cant-be-trusted-to-investigate-trump-assassination-attempt-roger-stone/" id=""> </a>‍<a href="https://www.freedomproject.com/2024/09/11/tnr20240911/" id="">FreedomProject Media.</a></p>

Protecting your
Medical Freedom
and Civil Liberties

Medical Mutilation

WHO Controls WHO?

Latest Work

Sovereignty Summit today to block UN 'Pact for the Future,' a power grab as dangerous as the WHO Pandemic Treaty

Mainstream media blame Trump for latest assassination attempt

Psyop backfire? 20% of voters less likely to vote Harris after Swift endorsement, poll shows

Biden Plan to “Help” Parents is a TRAP!

Latest Videos

How Much IsYour Freedom Worth?