The US Supreme Court hit back at a rogue federal judge who defied its pro-Trump ruling last month.On June 23rd, the high court issued a 6-3 decision granting the Trump administration the ability to deport criminal illegal aliens to countries other than their own. The decision tore down an injunction by US District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Massachusetts, who had blocked the Trump administration from deporting illegals to third countries without first allowing them to raise claims under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).&nbsp;Even after the Supreme Court’s ruling, however, Judge Murphy refused to back down and insisted his injunction remained in effect. The Trump administration therefore filed a Motion for Clarification with the Supreme Court, asking it to “make clear beyond any doubt that the government can immediately proceed with the third-country removals of the criminal aliens.” The government called Judge Murphy’s decision “a lawless act of defiance that, once again, disrupts sensitive diplomatic relations and slams the brakes on the executive’s lawful efforts to effectuate third-country removals.”<h2 id="">Even a dissenting justice agrees</h2>On Thursday, the Supreme Court granted the government’s motion, clarifying that Judge Murphy had indeed defied the nation’s highest court.“[Judge Murphy’s] order cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable,” the <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1153_2co3.pdf" id="">order</a> read. Even liberal Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, who dissented in the Supreme Court’s original decision, concurred.&nbsp;“I voted to deny the Government’s previous stay application in this case, and I continue to believe that this Court should not have stayed the District Court’s April 18 order enjoining the Government from deporting non-citizens to third countries without notice or a meaningful opportunity to be heard,” Justice Kagan wrote.“But a majority of this Court saw things differently, and I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this Court has stayed,” she said.Justices Sotomayor and Jackson issued a blistering dissent.“Today’s order clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial,” Sotomayor wrote.The case centered on eight criminal illegal aliens who the Trump administration attempted to deport to South Sudan. After Judge Murphy blocked the move, the men were held at a US naval base in Djibouti, another country in East Africa, while the administration fought the decision in court.‍

Supreme Court slaps back activist judge who defied its order

Federal judge refused to back down even after SCOTUS overturned his injunction against Trump

Violent protests against American tourists and immigrants erupted in Mexico City on Friday, with rioters destroying stores and threatening foreigners.Demonstrators gathered to protest mass tourism and gentrification by Americans visiting or moving to Mexico. According to NBC, Mexico City has seen a large influx of Americans since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020. Protesters railed against “gringos,” a slur that refers to Americans, and demanded tighter tourism and immigration policies.“Gringos, stop stealing our home,” read a sign worn by a protester. Another rioter was seen spray-painting the words “Kill a gringo” on a wall. Others destroyed and looted storefronts, damaged a dining area, and began screaming at foreigners in the area. Some patrons were seen huddled on the floor of a Starbucks as it was attacked by rioters. Trump effigies were burned.One demonstrator described, in Spanish, the tourists as, “[p]eople coming from other countries, mostly foreigners, who want to impose their culture [and] their prices and displace Mexicans, the native people of these lands.” A young female protester said, “I'm here because gentrification is just one more step towards colonization, dispossession, and the exploitation of our resources.”Another demonstrator claimed rent has increased by 47% in five years and blamed foreigners for Mexicans reportedly being forced to choose whether to buy food, water, or electricity.Other signs at the riots read “Not your home,” “Go home, gringo,” “Pay taxes, learn Spanish, respect my culture,” and “Death to the neocolonizer,” featuring a skull wearing an Uncle Sam hat.<div data-rt-embed-type='true'><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Anti-Gentrification (Anti-Gringo) Protest in Mexico City (CDMX) 🇲🇽 A Mexican protest telling Americans to go home that happened yesterday Thread of every video or photo I found 👇 <a href="https://t.co/9oCpSllAGp">pic.twitter.com/9oCpSllAGp</a>&mdash; Iberian_America (@Iberian_America) <a href="https://twitter.com/Iberian_America/status/1941480782092210640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><h2 id="">‘This is EXACTLY what they have done to America’</h2>The riots sparked outrage from Americans across the border, who are often criticized as racist for protesting mass immigration from Mexico. Mexican immigration has had a degentrification effect on American cities and neighborhoods, particularly as drugs and violent gangs flow across the southern border.“This is EXACTLY what they have done to America and DESTROYED our country for decades,” Wall Street Apes fumed.<div data-rt-embed-type='true'><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">This is absolutely inane, you literally CAN’T MAKE THIS UP Protestors in Mexico breaking windows and rioting because “gringos, stop stealing our homes” “People coming from other countries, mostly foreigners, who want to impose their culture, their prices and displace Mexicans,… <a href="https://t.co/H4RNC8ZdQU">pic.twitter.com/H4RNC8ZdQU</a>&mdash; Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) <a href="https://twitter.com/WallStreetApes/status/1941614579014144204?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>Last month, American Leftists and Mexican illegal aliens in the US rioted against tightening immigration restrictions. Carrying Mexican flags, they chanted “From Palestine to Mexico, the border walls have got to go” and “From Mexico to Gaza, globalize the intifada.” Figures on the American Left, including singer Katy Perry and legacy media activists, insisted that California belongs to Mexico—a claim repeated by Gerardo Fernández Noroña, the president of Mexico’s Senate.‍

‘Kill a Gringo’: Mexico rioters protest American immigrants

Riots spark outrage in the US: ‘This is EXACTLY what they have done to America’

Even as the courts give their seal of approval to homosexual and gender-bending propaganda in government schools (as long as parents are allowed an “opt out” for their children), the same court system is claiming — falsely — that displays of the Ten Commandments in the classroom are “unconstitutional.” Yes, seriously. The implications are hard to overstate.Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court famously found that parents have a right — for now — to opt their children out of controversial sex indoctrination. In particular, to protect “religious liberty,” school boards must allow children to be excused from indoctrination sessions promoting Lesbianism, “Gayness,” Bisexuality, Transgenderism, Queerness, (LGBTQ) and other sexual and gender perversions (+).But with the full blessing of courts and lawmakers, the tax-funded indoctrination of children into LGBTQ+ ideology as part of “compulsory education” will continue unabated. On the other hand, the same federal court system that protects that has been claiming for decades that the Bible and prayer are unconstitutional. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Following rulings against prayer and Bible readings, the high court’s first ruling against the Ten Commandments in education came in 1980. “Posting of religious texts on the wall serves no … educational function,” wrote far-left Justice William Brennan in the ruling, claiming the decalogue could only be taught as “history” or “comparative religion” alongside other “religious” texts.The ruling got even more ridiculous from there. “If the posted copies of the Ten Commandments are to have any effect at all, it will be to induce the schoolchildren to read, meditate upon, perhaps to venerate and obey, the Commandments,” the ruling continued, sounding like a parody while implying that having children ponder objective morality and obey God’s moral laws would be a negative thing. &nbsp;Ironically, Moses holding the Ten Commandments is literally pictured on the outside wall of the high court. And as any students of American education know well, the Bible was the primary textbook used for educating children for centuries before pagan and godless propaganda took its place over the last century — and long before child suicide, mass shootings, drug abuse, illiteracy, fake history, fake science, gender confusion, and other absurdities took over what passes for education. &nbsp;The latest federal ruling against the Ten Commandments in school came on June 20 from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, widely considered one of the most conservative in the nation. The three-judge panel on the court affirmed a district court decision claiming a 2024 Louisiana law requiring the decalogue in classrooms was “facially unconstitutional.”“H.B. 71 [the state law requiring a display of the Ten Commandments] is plainly unconstitutional. The district court did not err,” the U.S. appeals court said in its controversial decision. “H.B. 71’s minimum requirements provide sufficient details about how the Ten Commandments must be displayed. Plaintiffs have shown that those displays will cause an ‘irreparable” deprivation of their First Amendment rights.’”In a statement cited by various media outlets, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said she and her office “strongly disagree” with the ruling. As such, she promptly filed an appeal with the full court asking it to review the decision of the three-judge panel. Murrill also vowed to go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, if necessary.“The 5th Circuit’s panel decision in this case directly rejected the 5th Circuit’s own precedents and precedents from other circuits and the Supreme Court,” the state attorney general said after appealing. “This is exactly the sort of case that warrants full Court review, and we appreciate the Court’s careful consideration.”The law in question, passed last year, calls for all government schools to display a legible copy of the Ten Commandments in a prominent location in each classroom. At the time, lawmakers said it was impossible to understand America, Western civilization, or history without the decalogue, as if those things should be needed to teach children about the moral laws of their Creator. <a href="https://www.freedomproject.com/2025/06/02/tnr6225/" id="">Similar statutes have been passed in Texas</a>, <a href="https://www.freedomproject.com/2025/04/18/tnr41825/" id="">Arkansas, and other states.</a>Just last week, more lawsuits were filed in federal courts claiming the decalogue violates the Constitution. In Texas, a group of parents represented by high-powered lawyers filed a suit. “The government should govern; the Church should minister,” the lawsuit reads. “Anything else is a threat to the soul of both our democracy and our faith.”One of the plaintiffs, a mother, claimed to be worried she will be “forced” to have “sensitive” discussions about topics such as adultery with her children. One example cited in the suit explains that this concerned mother “does not desire that her minor children to be instructed by their school about the biblical conception of adultery.” &nbsp;The irony is hard to process. Conversations about adultery may be inappropriate with children, in the minds of these supposedly concerned parents and judges. But taxpayer-funded indoctrination about puberty blockers, sodomy, surgical mutilation of genitals, and other horrors are just fine.Texas Governor Greg Abbott vowed to defend the law — and win. “Faith and freedom are the foundation of our nation,” the Republican chief executive argued on social media. “If anyone sues, we’ll win that battle.” Despite Abbott’s confidence, there is a good chance the courts will continue to rule against God’s laws, as they have for decades. For the courts to claim posting the Ten Commandments in the classroom is “unconstitutional” shows just how ignorant and misinformed society has become. When the First Amendment prohibiting Congress from establishing a religion was written and ratified, many states had established churches. Virtually all schools taught the Bible. And society was far better off.The Bible was the most cited course in the writings of the authors of the Constitution. And the primary legal scholar they cited, Sir William Blackstone, said the Bible is supreme over all human laws. In his famous Commentaries on the Laws of England, known as the “bedrock of American jurisprudence,” Blackstone said no laws contradicting God’s laws — as revealed in His Word — are to be considered valid.Ironically, the Constitution itself was based on what key founding-era leaders such as Harvard President Samuel Langdon described as the “Republic of the Israelites.” More specifically, Langdon said the <a href="https://www.consource.org/document/the-republic-of-the-israelites-an-example-to-the-american-states-by-samuel-langdon-1788-6-5/" id="">U.S. Constitution was modeled on the principles of government delivered by God to Moses and the Old Testament Hebrews</a>. As such, he urged New Hampshire lawmakers to ratify it, and they complied. &nbsp; Even more ironically, under the guise of enforcing the First Amendment in the early 1960s, the Supreme Court struck down prayer and Bible in local schools. What it did, though, was precisely what Congress was prohibited from doing in that amendment: it established a (false) religion by edict. “Refusal to permit religious exercises thus is seen, not as the realization of state neutrality, but rather as the establishment of a religion of secularism,” explained Justice Potter Stewart in his dissent (emphasis added).Critics of the government school system argued that the recent rulings against the decalogue show that trying to restore morality through government schools is a hopeless endeavor. “It’s a fool’s errand to rely on public schools to hand down morality,” <a href="https://readlion.com/ten-commandments-ruling-proves-we-cant-count-on-public-schools-to-revive-morality-in-america/" id="">argued</a> Michael Ryan, executive editor of the Christian education-focused news service The Lion.“For one thing, God – the source of all morality – is no longer welcome in public schools,” continued Ryan. “They are perhaps the only place in the endless stretches of His creation where He’s not allowed to tread… It’s clear we won’t even begin to repair the moral rot, growing like black mold in the nation’s dank soul, through the public schools.”“We’ll just have to look elsewhere,” he continued, calling on parents to pursue Christian education. “To God, of course. In church, naturally, but also in every aspect and avenue of our lives. We must also look to parents, who are children’s first teachers anyway. Parents must simply double down, triple down, quadruple down, on their teaching about God and morality.”<figure id="" class="w-richtext-figure-type-image " data-rt-type="image" data-rt-align=""><div><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66450044188dfe741d77c31e/675760085727de303fda4239_3364780_1225x377_2500-1024x315.jpeg" alt="" width="auto" height="auto" loading="auto" id=""></div></figure>A nation in which rogue, godless courts bless homosexual and transgender indoctrination of children but ban the moral laws of the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth is heading for utter destruction. Government schools, with full backing from the courts, have become the single greatest danger to children in history. It is now up to parents and churches to rescue those children, before it’s too late. &nbsp;<a href="https://libertysentinel.org/author/admin/" id="">Alex Newman</a> is an award-winning international journalist, educator, author, and consultant who co-wrote the book “Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children.” He writes for diverse publications in the United States and abroad. Originally published at <a href="https://libertysentinel.org/courts-lgbt-in-school-fine-but-ten-commandments-unconstitutional/">Liberty Sentinel</a>.

Courts: LGBT in School Fine, But Ten Commandments “Unconstitutional”

The tax-funded indoctrination of children into LGBTQ+ ideology as part of “compulsory education” continues unabated

Several cities in California canceled July 4th celebrations this weekend out of concern that immigration authorities might arrest illegal aliens who attend.&nbsp;<h2 id="">Los Angeles</h2><a href="https://www.newsweek.com/list-cities-canceling-4th-july-events-expands-what-know-2094163" id="">According</a> to Newsweek, the Los Angeles Parks and Recreation Department canceled East LA's Rockin' 4th of July celebration and other community events to protect illegals from being apprehended by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents."It is with deep respect and a heavy heart that the County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation announces . . . the cancellation of this year's East Los Angeles Rockin 4th of July celebration. Out of caution, and in response to recent ICE enforcement activity impacting our communities, we are prioritizing safety and well-being of our residents, visitors, and staff,” the department said.<h2 id="">Bell Gardens</h2>Bell Gardens issued a similar statement explaining why the city was canceling all Independence Day celebrations: “Out of an abundance of caution regarding concerns for resident safety over federal immigration enforcement activities, the City of Bell Gardens will be canceling . . . Independence Day Celebration.” The city then published resources for illegal aliens such as “know your rights” fact sheets.<h2 id="">Boyle Heights and Huntington Park</h2>Boyle Heights and Huntington Park also canceled their July 4th celebrations, with Boyle Heights officials blaming the decision on “the presence of federal agents in the community.”<h2 id="">Whittier</h2>Whittier Mayor Joe Vinatieri did not specifically name ICE in his statement announcing the cancelation of July 4th celebrations."While celebrating our nation's founding is very important to me and to Whittier residents, my colleagues and I also want to be sensitive to the recent feedback we've received from some community members asking that we pause this year's Freedom Walk event,” Vinatieri said.<h2 id="">‘Canceling America’</h2>The cancelations sparked outrage for denying Americans the chance to partake in Independence Day celebrations.“They’re basically canceling America,” said Gloria Romero, a former Democratic State Senate majority leader who joined the Republican Party last year. “We are basically led by a far-left, ultra-woke, Trump Derangement Syndrome–suffering fools.”‍

Protecting your
Medical Freedom
and Civil Liberties

Stream What is a Doctor? Today!

The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - A Good Doctor Speaks with Dr. Gold

Latest Work

Supreme Court slaps back activist judge who defied its order

‘Kill a Gringo’: Mexico rioters protest American immigrants

Courts: LGBT in School Fine, But Ten Commandments “Unconstitutional”

California cities cancel July 4th celebrations to protect illegal aliens

Latest Videos

How Much IsYour Freedom Worth?