When the COVID-19 mRNA shots were first rolled out in December 2020, Dr. Kirk Moore’s approach was simple: get it if you want it. But when the mandates made vaccination a prerequisite to receive organ transplants, remain employed, visit family, or attend school, the Utah plastic surgeon said it was the last straw.After conversations within his personal network, Dr. Moore concluded that the Hippocratic Oath required him to protect his patients from the shots. At their request, he injected them with harmless saline instead of the mRNA serum. He provided them with proof of vaccination cards so they could partake in the free society that would otherwise be restricted to them. He threw out the mRNA vaccines he had in stock—about $28,000 worth.The Biden Justice Department indicted Dr. Moore for defrauding the US government, threatening him with up to 35 years in prison. The indictment came as a shock to Dr. Moore.“There are no laws that require me to give a vaccine,” he told me on Wednesday. “What they were requiring us to do was not a law, and so I just didn’t think I was violating anything,” he added. The physician was also surprised to be charged by the federal government. He figured that any issues would come through the Utah Department of Health.It was a challenging time for Dr. Moore and his two teen children, whom he was raising by himself. Although they never doubted him, the DOJ indictment brought a new level of stress. Money grew tight as Dr. Moore’s practice came to a standstill while he poured funds into his legal defense.“It took a huge financial toll,” he recalled. “And the stressful toll of just having the Goliath of the federal government hanging over you.”But as the tide began to turn against the authoritarian COVID-19 mandates, public support for Dr. Moore increased. He not only had the backing of well-known medical freedom activists like America’s Frontline Doctors founder Dr. Simone Gold, but his case drew the attention of GOP lawmakers like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), and Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT). After President Trump retook the White House, the matter was brought before Attorney General Pam Bondi, who had been unaware of the case.On July 12th, four days after his trial began, the charges were dropped.“At my direction @TheJusticeDept has dismissed charges against Dr. Kirk Moore,” announced Bondi on X, explaining that “Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so.”The surgeon says he didn’t just protect his patients by giving them saline—he also influenced state law.“I went to our state House here and state Senate subcommittees and testified to try to get the mandates changed here in Utah, and I did,” he told me. “I testified for allowing for exemptions. I testified that if you’re going to require a vaccine, you have to have an exemption. And I testified to have a law passed that says that they cannot require anybody to have gene-altering therapy against their advice or against their will.”He also became involved with an organization working to pass laws protecting children from mandates in schools.<h2 id="">Have you received any apologies from the legacy media or medical establishment?</h2>"None," said Dr. Moore. In fact, when a local legacy media affiliate recently came to interview him, the reporter asked if he was vaccinated.“No, are you?” replied Dr. Moore. The reporter balked and said indignantly, “I just don’t think I need to answer that question.”“Well, there you go,” the physician responded. “That’s exactly what my patients wanted.”The news outlet nonetheless published a hit piece on Dr. Moore, accusing him of “endangering society.”<h2 id="">Should patients trust their doctors?</h2>Trust in doctors has plummeted since COVID-19, a trend Dr. Moore agrees with.&nbsp;“Anyone with an 8th-grade education knew this was an experimental shot,” he said. When doctors and nurses told patients the shot was “safe,” they had no way of knowing that. They didn’t know what was in it and had no placebo-controlled studies to back up their claim.&nbsp;“They’re lying to you,” said Dr. Moore.Instead of blindly trusting doctors, “ask questions and find somebody that you do trust,” he advises. The surgeon name-dropped trustworthy doctors he knows, like Dr. Simone Gold, Dr. Jim Thorpe, and Dr. Pierre Kory.<h2 id="">Why hasn’t RFK Jr. withdrawn the shots from the market?</h2>Dr. Moore expressed frustration at the fact that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has not yet ordered the withdrawal of the COVID-19 shots from the market. He speculated that there are powerful Trump officials blocking such a move—officials like Chief of Staff Susan Wiles, who Dr. Moore says has strong ties to the pharmaceutical industry.“I thought RFK was going to do it first thing,” the surgeon said. “Are there mafia tactics behind the scenes? Are there threats? Blackmail? Are people scared for their lives? I have no idea,” he added. “But it should have been done as soon as RFK was confirmed and sworn in. His first action should have been to take these off the market.”‍

Exclusive Interview: No regrets - Hero doctor who faced prison for defying vaccine mandate speaks out

He was criminally charged for protecting his patients. Now he's being celebrated.

A violent anti-ICE rioter was released from pretrial detention on Monday, becoming the latest far-Left domestic terrorist to avoid jail.<h2 id="">Robert Hoopes</h2>On June 14th, 24-year-old Robert Jacob Hoopes participated in a riot outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Oregon. Hoopes threw a rock that struck a police officer in the head, causing what the DOJ called&nbsp; a “significant laceration” under the officer’s eye. With the help of two others, Hoopes used a pole as a battering ram to try to break through the facility, causing “significant damage” to the main door.On Monday, Obama-appointed Judge Youlee Yim You ordered Hoopes released from jail, to be fitted with an ankle monitor instead. According to Oregon Public Broadcasting, the judge based her decision partly on the showing of support for Hoopes in the courtroom. Attendees included Hoopes’ father, who said he was proud of his son for defending illegal aliens.<h2 id="">Adam Lansky</h2>Federal judges have also refused to detain Adam Lansky, a transgender-identifying man who attacked a Tesla dealership in January. Lansky firebombed the dealership with Molotov cocktails, aimed a rifle at a witness, and returned the next day to shoot up the building. <a href="https://dailycaller.com/2025/07/29/blue-state-judges-refuse-jail-leftists-charged-violent-attacks/">According</a> to the Daily Caller, the DOJ warned the court that Lansky belongs to a militant organization called the Socialist Rifle Association, a group that trains radical Leftists and Marxists across the US in firearms. The DOJ also expressed concern that, if released, Lansky could continue to make bombs.“The [improvised explosive devices] used by Lansky were all manufactured by him using everyday items, empty glass bottles, gasoline, fabric, etc., all these items remain easily accessible to Lansky in the community if released,” the DOJ said in a court filing.Nevertheless, Obama-appointed Judge Stacie Beckerman ordered Lansky’s release to a halfway house, calling his behavior an “outlier event.” When the DOJ appealed to Judge Adrienne Nelson, who is celebrated as the first Black woman to serve on Oregon’s District Court, she upheld Beckerman’s decision.<h2 id="">‘Julie’ Winters</h2>Beckerman also ordered the release of another transgender-identifying rioter, “Julie” Winters, to a halfway house. Winters tried to set off a bomb near an ICE building, threw a large knife at a federal officer, which missed, and pulled a knife on officers who tried to restrain him. He had also assaulted a police officer in December. Beckerman released Winters from jail because he was kept in solitary confinement rather than with male or female inmates due to his gender confusion.<h2 id="">Dylan Bryan Adams</h2>In April, a Democratic Minnesota official evaded charges for domestic terrorism. Dylan Bryan Adams, a fiscal policy analyst for the Minnesota Department of Human Services, was arrested after keying six Teslas, causing over $21,000 in damages. Instead of filing charges, Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty—who has been backed by billionaire George Soros—said she will enter Adams into an adult diversion program. Diversion programs are designed to keep criminals out of the justice system and offer activities such as counseling and community service.<h2 id="">Owen McIntire</h2>Owen McIntire, a 19-year-old physics major at the University of Massachusetts Boston, was arrested after throwing two Molotov cocktails at a Tesla dealership in Kansas City. The firebombs caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage to two cybertrucks and two charging stations.&nbsp;Federal prosecutors sought to keep McIntire in federal custody, arguing that the terrorism-related charges make him a public safety threat. On April 24th, however, Judge Jessica Hedges overruled the prosecutors and granted McIntire release so he could continue to receive “gender-affirming care.” The judge also cited McIntire’s autism and ADHD, for which he takes medication. He was released to the custody of his parents and will remain under house arrest until his trial, which has been delayed a year.‍

More far-Left domestic terrorists avoid pre-trial detention

Violent rioters who attacked federal agents get ankle monitors and halfway houses pending trial 

America’s fertility rate plunged to a new low last year, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/fertility-rate-us-low-cdc-replacement-532c4f43f420f29b32212db9cfa0e0af" id="">according</a> to numbers published last week by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).The data show that an average of fewer than 1.6 babies were born per woman in 2024. This is far below the replacement rate of 2.1, which is the number a generation needs to replace itself.The US fertility rate has been plummeting for decades. In the early 1960s, it was 3.5. It began to decline with the “women’s liberation movement” until it reached 1.7 in 1976. The rate briefly rebounded to 2.1 by 2007, but has since continued to drop.&nbsp;The Trump administration is taking measures to increase the fertility rates. In February, President Trump signed an executive order reducing the cost of IVF. The administration has also supported the idea of offering “baby bonuses,” financial incentives for having children.The decline is part of a general fertility crisis in the West, with nearly all countries outside of Africa suffering from falling fertility rates. The UK’s fertility rate last year was just 1.44, down from 2.47 in 1946, leading British officials to <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/06/30/have-more-children-labour-bridget-phillipson-birth-rate/" id="">plead</a> with the public to have children. The UN recently issued a warning about plunging birth rates after a survey showed disappointing results. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clynq459wxgo" id="">polled</a> 14,000 people across 14 countries about their fertility rates: South Korea, Thailand, Italy, Hungary, Germany, Sweden, Brazil, Mexico, the US, India, Indonesia, Morocco, South Africa, and Nigeria. Twenty percent of respondents said they don’t yet have or don’t expect to have their desired number of children.Researchers <a href="https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/newsroom/news-releases/lancet-dramatic-declines-global-fertility-rates-set-transform#data" id="">warn</a> that by 2050, two-thirds of countries will lack the fertility rates to sustain their populations. That number will increase to 97% by 2100, which is when sub-Saharan Africa is expected to account for 50% of global births. Currently, fertility rates are highest in Africa, where Chad boasts the highest in the world.<h2 id="">Feminism</h2>One of the main causes of the fertility crisis is feminism. Feminist ideals like widespread abortion, higher education, and full-time careers are all associated with lower fertility rates. The UN is known to aggressively encourage women’s participation in the labor force, even turning it into a <a href="https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb7/A_INB7_3-en.pdf" id="">public health</a> issue.This has become an unmistakable success. <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/02/14/millennial-life-how-young-adulthood-today-compares-with-prior-generations-2/#:~:text=Millennial%20women%20are%20about%20four,better%20educated%20than%20their%20predecessors." id="">According</a> to data from Pew Research, Millennial women are four times more likely than those in the Silent Generation to have a bachelor’s degree — and the more educated a woman becomes, the more likely she is to postpone having children or not have them at all.&nbsp;In the 1960s, only about 40% of women were employed. Today, that number is 72% among Millennial women.Business Insider says declining birth and marriage rates are being driven by women who are choosing careers over children, which it claims is “a sign of economic progress, signaling a rise in individualism and women's autonomy.”"I couldn't imagine juggling work and children. I wouldn't be able to care for my two dogs without my husband,” 40-year-old career woman Jennifer Mathieu <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/women-dont-want-kids-birth-rate-love-fulfilling-life-2022-4?op=1" id="">told</a> the publication, adding: "I have zero regrets, love my life, and think at least three to four times a week about how thankful I am that I do not have children.""We both work hard at our careers and honestly didn't feel like children fit into the life and goals we wanted," said Heather Watson, another female professional. "It always felt like it would be unfair to kids to try to fit them into our lives."“Kids are expensive and sticky,” said another career woman.Statista confirms that women no longer feel marriage is important because they have “gained economic power.”<h2 id="">The Jaffe Memo plan for Depopulation</h2>Feminism was just one of the proposed measures laid out over 50 years ago in the Jaffe Memo, which outlined a detailed plan for depopulation.In 1969, an economist named Frederick Jaffe devised a set of proposals to limit US population growth, which continue to be put into practice today. Jaffe, who at the time was vice president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, had created the plan at the request of Bernard Berelson.Berelson was the head of the <a href="https://popcouncil.org/focus_area/gender-equality-equity/" id="">Population Council</a>, an organization founded by John D. Rockefeller III in 1952 to stem birth rates in the United States. Until today, the Population Council has concerned itself with researching contraception and other ways to prevent births, such as the Copper T intrauterine device. Since then, an estimated 50 million Copper Ts have been distributed in over 70 countries.&nbsp;In 1969, Berelson was searching for ideas.Jaffe rose to the occasion and responded with what would later become known as the Jaffe Memo. He proposed a set of actions that he believed could suppress the US birth rate. He compiled them into a table titled “Proposed measures to reduce fertility by universality or selectivity of impact in the US.”&nbsp;Some of those proposed measures were to “encourage increased homosexuality,” “allow harmless contraceptives to be distributed nonmedically,” to “make contraception truly available and accessible,” and to provide “abortion and sterilization on demand.”Another measure was titled “Restructure family” and contained two parts: “(a) Postpone or avoid marriage,” and “(b) Alter image of ideal family size.”These were listed alongside two of Jaffe’s other propositions, which were to drive women into higher education and to convince more women to join the workforce.“[T]he relationship between employment of women and lower fertility seems well established,” <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0KCqtNShmxgYTA1REcxai1OME0/view?resourcekey=0-qliJBd6Jgnczp1-tsH2z_A" id="">wrote</a> Jaffe. He said that full employment is accompanied by higher inflation, a sacrifice the US may need to make to depopulate. “How much inflation could or should we risk to achieve lower fertility?” he asked.Another of Jaffe’s proposed actions was to place “fertility control agents in the water supply.”&nbsp;Common pesticides have been found to not only dramatically affect fertility but also to feminize males. In one study of the pesticide atrazine, most male frogs exposed to the toxin became attracted to other males, including some who began functioning as females and produced eggs. Most atrazine produced in the United States is <a href="https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/effeminizing-toxin-in-us-food-water-supply-found-produced-by-china-epa-ignores-query" id="">manufactured</a> by Syngenta, a company owned by the Chinese Communist Party.&nbsp;These pesticides, which have been detected in water supplies across the US, have been <a href="https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/pesticides-cause-dramatic-impact-on-male-fertility-says-study" id="">blamed</a> for reducing the sperm count in men by 50% over the last 50 years.Other depopulation techniques proposed by Jaffe included compulsory education for children and government incentives for lower birth rates as possible effective methods. Another entry listed among the proposed measures simply reads “chronic depression” with no further explanation.Discouraging private home ownership was also one of the proposals, which is also a cornerstone of the WEF’s Agenda 2030, which <a href="https://www.caepla.org/what_would_a_world_without_property_rights_look_like" id="">promises</a> taxpayers they will “own nothing” and “be happy.”“The hypothesis underlying these proposals is that the achievement of a society in which effective contraception is efficiently distributed to all, based on present voluntary norms, would either result in a tolerable rate of growth, or go very far toward achieving it,” Jaffe wrote. “If this hypothesis is basically confirmed, it would negate the need for an explicit U.S. population policy which goes beyond voluntary norms.”In the year the Jaffe Memo was produced, then-President Richard Nixon proposed the creation of a presidential advisory commission tasked with creating a plan to solve the “population problem.” The next year, Nixon <a href="https://nssm200.com/population-and-the-american-future-the-report-of-the-commission-on-population-growth-and-the-american-future/63.htm" id="">established</a> the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, on which sat both Jaffe and Berelson.Today, the Population Council’s <a href="https://popcouncil.org/focus_area/climate-environment/" id="">website</a> focuses on gender equality, abortion on demand, and even “climate change” as a determinant of “reproductive health and fertility.” A growing number of adherents on the Left have sworn off having children due to climate change, fearing it will soon cause an Armageddon.<h2 id="">FP2030</h2>Other globalist bodies have been investing heavily in bringing the Jaffe Memo to realization, particularly through an organization called FP2030.In July 2012, a meeting in London was <a href="https://frontline.news/post/us-gates-foundation-use-gender-strategy-for-population-control" id="">convened</a> by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the UK Department for International Development (DFID), and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The goal of the meeting was “to empower the voluntary use of modern contraception by 120 million additional women and girls in the world’s lowest-income countries by 2020.” Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) was formed.FP2020 soon recruited over 130 governments, organizations, and corporations to join the cause. Drug companies like Pfizer and Bayer <a href="https://fp2030.org/pfizer" id="">pledged</a> to provide birth preventive products all around the world.&nbsp;As 2020 approached, FP2020’s founders evidently deemed it so successful that they renewed it for another decade and renamed the organization FP2030. Its globalist managers include North America and Europe Managing DIrector Monica Kerrigan, MPH, who previously worked for Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation, and USAID.In 2021, FP2030 received $1.4 billion from government funding alone, with over $500 million annually from USAID.When starting a birth prevention campaign in a target country, FP2030’s founding organizations first contact an official in that country’s Health Ministry. They present the official with a strategy containing high-impact practices (HIPs) for preventing births on a mass scale and provide them with the funds to execute it.However, FP2030’s goal is not simply to make birth prevention devices available, but to convince women to take them. Therefore, any mass birth prevention strategy must “improve attitudes.”&nbsp;One of the main vehicles used for changing minds and attitudes towards birth prevention is mass media. In a 2016 High Impact Practices Partners’ meeting <a href="https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/highimpactpracticespartnersmeetingreport_nov292016.pdf" id="">attended</a> by FP2030 operatives, organizations were encouraged to “[u]se one or more mass media channels (radio, TV, print) to increase knowledge, improve attitudes and self-efficacy, and encourage social change to effect family planning.”Another part of the strategy is using gender confusion ideology to prevent mass births. Whereas men and women naturally have children, masculinizing women and effeminizing men — contravening “gender norms” — is an effective way to stagnate a population.“For FP2030, an intentional approach to gender equality makes our work more effective in advancing both family planning and gender equality,” says an FP2030 presentation titled “FP2030 Gender Strategy.”The organization plainly states that “[g]ender norms . . . create barriers to FP access” and “[w]ith greater funding and scale, gender-transformative approaches will advance gender equality and accelerate progress on contraceptive access and use.”In countries where birth prevention rates are stagnant, FP2030 says gender ideology, or “positive gender norms,” can be “more effective”: “In countries where contraceptive prevalence has plateaued, demand-side interventions promoting positive gender norms can be more effective than supply‑side approaches.”Gender Strategy notes that feminist operatives are also very helpful in driving birth prevention.Such gender confusion — where women are masculinized and men are effeminized — is also <a href="https://frontline.news/post/dangerous-tinkering-with-women-s-endocrine-system-in-single-minded-pursuit-of-convenient-reproductive-control" id="">achieved</a> by birth prevention drugs themselves. According to scientific evidence, women who take birth prevention pills are likely to find more effeminate men attractive and themselves less attractive. They are also more likely to be sexually dissatisfied and cheat on their partners. If the woman wants to conceive, she can cease taking the pill, which may make her lose interest in her partner, potentially fragmenting the family if a child is conceived.‍

US fertility rate plummets to historic low

A depopulation plan has been long in the making

British Prime Minister desperately tried to deny his administration’s infamous censorship policies during a meeting with President Trump on Monday.Under UK law, citizens who post “harmful content” online face up to two years in prison. Taxpayers have been <a href="https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/london-police-investigate-woman-for-criticizing-trans-doctor" id="">arrested</a> and imprisoned for voicing criticism against gender ideology, migrant violence, and Islam. Police have even <a href="https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/uk-police-continue-investigating-forbidden-thoughts" id="">arrested</a> citizens for silently praying outside abortion centers. Britain’s Home Office recently <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14945799/Keir-Starmer-censorship-police-monitor-social-media-migrants-signs-unrest.html" id="">assembled</a> a National Internet Intelligence Investigations team, a law enforcement unit tasked with monitoring anti-immigration posts online. According to a November <a href="https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/orwellian-uk-police-spend-60-000-hours-a-year-on-non-criminal-hate" id="">study</a>, British police spend an estimated 60,000 hours a year investigating reports of non-criminal hate incidents. In 2023 alone, police made an average of <a href="https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2025-002239_EN.html" id="">30 arrests per day</a> for “offensive” social media posts. Last year, Starmer responded to anti-immigration protests by announcing a crack down on “criminal speech.”This crackdown on free speech has earned rebukes from both President Trump and Vice President JD Vance. In April, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the administration might even consider granting asylum to Brits who flee the UK to avoid arrest over free speech.<h2 id="">‘We’re not censoring anyone’</h2>But on Monday, when confronted by a reporter as Trump looked on, Starmer nervously tried to deny the UK’s censorship, claiming that the government is only suppressing content that can lead to teen suicides.“We’re not censoring anyone,” Starmer said. “We’ve got some measures that are there to protect children, in particular from sites like suicide sites, we’ve had too many cases in the United Kingdom of young children taking their own lives and when you look through their social media, they’ve been accessing some sites which talk about suicide and encouraging, if you like, children down that road and that is what we want to stop. Nothing about censoring free speech. This country is proud [to have] free speech in this country, we’ve had it for a very long time and we’re very, very proud of it.”“We will protect [free speech] forever, but at the same time, I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that’s what it usually is, from things like suicide sites and that’s not a free speech issue. I see that as a child protection issue,” he added.<div data-rt-embed-type='true'><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">NOW - Starmer: &quot;We&#39;re not censoring anyone.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/Uzrx3qK5XF">pic.twitter.com/Uzrx3qK5XF</a>&mdash; Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) <a href="https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1949823016973602942?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><h2 id="">Starmer: ‘We’re very proud’ to defend free speech</h2>During the initial press conference outside Trump Turnberry in Turnberry, Scotland, a reporter posed a question about free speech.“Can you discuss the importance of free speech today?” she asked.Trump responded by diplomatically lobbing the question at Starmer.&nbsp;“Well, free speech is very important,” said the president. “I don't know if you're referring to any place in particular. Perhaps they are. But—”Starmer cut in to insist the British government protects free speech, earning a smirk and gesture from Trump.“We've had free speech for a very, very long time here,” the prime minister said with a nervous laugh. “So, we're very proud about that.”<div data-rt-embed-type='true'><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Keir Starmer: &quot;We have had free speech for a very long time so, errrr, we&#39;re very proud about that&quot;. Look at the sheer panic on Keir Starmer&#39;s face. He&#39;s lying. And the entire country knows he&#39;s lying. The man is not fit for office. <a href="https://t.co/SsaMrTWmQF">pic.twitter.com/SsaMrTWmQF</a>&mdash; Lee Harris (@addicted2newz) <a href="https://twitter.com/addicted2newz/status/1949805471772135614?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>‍

Protecting your
Medical Freedom
and Civil Liberties

Stream What is a Doctor? Today!

The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - A Good Doctor Speaks with Dr. Gold

Latest Work

Exclusive Interview: No regrets - Hero doctor who faced prison for defying vaccine mandate speaks out

More far-Left domestic terrorists avoid pre-trial detention

US fertility rate plummets to historic low

British PM scrambles to deny censorship policies during Trump visit

Latest Videos

How Much IsYour Freedom Worth?