<p id="">A Democrat judge has spared a Leftist activist jail time after she assaulted US Pardon Attorney Ed Martin and two US Marshals, continuing a trend where far-Left criminals are granted leniency for attacking Republicans.</p><p id="">Emily Gabriella Sommer, 33, was <a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/district-woman-pleads-guilty-assault-spitting-former-interim-us-attorney-edward-r-martin" id="">charged</a> with assault in May after she approached Martin while he was interviewing with a Newsmax correspondent and spat on him. Martin was the interim US Attorney at the time. Sommer then shouted at him, “You are a disgusting man. F*ck&nbsp; you, Ed Martin. My name is Emily Gabriella Sommer, and you are served.”</p><p id="">When she was arrested two weeks later, Sommer kicked two Deputy US Marshals and spat on one of them. While awaiting trial, she issued vile threats on social media to Martin and current US Attorney Jeanine Pirro.</p><p id="">DOJ prosecutors asked for an 18-month prison sentence, but Biden-appointed Judge Jia Cobb sentenced her to four months’ time served, house arrest, and probation.</p><p id="">“It’s clear that if you assault a conservative, the system will protect you,” Martin said in response to the ruling.</p><p id="">There is evidence for Martin’s statement.</p><h2 id="">Patrick Brice</h2><p id="">In August, 28-year-old Patrick Brice avoided prison after a 2023 incident where he brutally assaulted two elderly pro-life activists, Dick Schafer (80) and Mark Crosby (73), outside a Planned Parenthood in Baltimore after an argument. Brice attacked 80-year-old Dick Schafer from behind and severely beat 73-year-old Mark Crosby, causing significant injuries, including a shattered orbital bone, blindness in one eye, and photophobia. Convicted in February of reckless endangerment and second-degree assault, Brice faced a possible 10-year prison sentence but was sentenced instead to one year of home detention, three years’ probation, anger management classes, drug and alcohol screening, and therapy.</p><h2 id="">Robert Hoopes</h2><p id="">On June 14th, 24-year-old Robert Jacob Hoopes participated in a riot outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Oregon. Hoopes threw a rock that struck a police officer in the head, causing what the DOJ called&nbsp; a “significant laceration” under the officer’s eye. With the help of two others, Hoopes used a pole as a battering ram to try to break through the facility, causing “significant damage” to the main door.</p><p id="">In July, Obama-appointed Judge Youlee Yim You ordered Hoopes released from jail, to be fitted with an ankle monitor instead. According to <em id="">Oregon Public Broadcasting</em>, the judge based her decision partly on the showing of support for Hoopes in the courtroom. Attendees included Hoopes’ father, who said he was proud of his son for defending illegal aliens.</p><h2 id="">Adam Lansky</h2><p id="">Federal judges have also refused to detain Adam Lansky, a transgender-identifying man who attacked a Tesla dealership in January. Lansky firebombed the dealership with Molotov cocktails, aimed a rifle at a witness, and returned the next day to shoot up the building. <a href="https://dailycaller.com/2025/07/29/blue-state-judges-refuse-jail-leftists-charged-violent-attacks/" id="">According</a> to the <em id="">Daily Caller</em>, the DOJ warned the court that Lansky belongs to a militant organization called the Socialist Rifle Association, a group that trains radical Leftists and Marxists across the US in firearms. The DOJ also expressed concern that if released, Lansky could continue to make bombs.</p><p id="">“The [improvised explosive devices] used by Lansky were all manufactured by him using everyday items, empty glass bottles, gasoline, fabric, etc., all these items remain easily accessible to Lansky in the community if released,” the DOJ said in a court filing.</p><p id="">Nevertheless, Obama-appointed Judge Stacie Beckerman ordered Lansky’s release to a halfway house, calling his behavior an “outlier event.” When the DOJ appealed to Judge Adrienne Nelson, who is celebrated as the first Black woman to serve on Oregon’s District Court, she upheld Beckerman’s decision.</p><h2 id="">‘Julie’ Winters</h2><p id="">Beckerman also ordered the release of another transgender-identifying rioter, “Julie” Winters, to a halfway house. Winters tried to set off a bomb near an ICE building, threw a large knife at a federal officer, which missed, and pulled a knife on officers who tried to restrain him. He had also assaulted a police officer in December. Beckerman released Winters from jail because he was kept in solitary confinement rather than with male or female inmates due to his gender confusion.</p><h2 id="">Dylan Bryan Adams</h2><p id="">In April, a Democratic Minnesota official evaded charges for domestic terrorism. Dylan Bryan Adams, a fiscal policy analyst for the Minnesota Department of Human Services, was arrested after keying six Teslas, causing over $21,000 in damages. Instead of filing charges, Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty—who has been backed by billionaire George Soros—said she will enter Adams into an adult diversion program. Diversion programs are designed to keep criminals out of the justice system and offer activities such as counseling and community service.</p><h2 id="">Owen McIntire</h2><p id="">Owen McIntire, a 19-year-old physics major at the University of Massachusetts Boston, was arrested after throwing two Molotov cocktails at a Tesla dealership in Kansas City. The firebombs caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage to two cybertrucks and two charging stations.&nbsp;</p><p id="">Federal prosecutors sought to keep McIntire in federal custody, arguing that the terrorism-related charges make him a public safety threat. On April 24th, however, Judge Jessica Hedges overruled the prosecutors and granted McIntire release so he could continue to receive “gender-affirming care.” The judge also cited McIntire’s autism and ADHD, for which he takes medication. He was released to the custody of his parents and will remain under house arrest until his trial, which has been delayed a year.</p><p id="">‍</p>

Violent Leftist who assaulted US officials avoids jail time

'It’s clear that if you assault a conservative, the system will protect you'

<p id="">A new report is upending assumptions about the direction of gender ideology. After years of rapid growth, the number of U.S. students identifying as transgender has dropped sharply — and the shift appears to be accelerating.</p><p id="">The <a href="https://www.heterodoxcentre.com/research/chss-report-no-5/" id="">report</a>, published by Professor Eric Kaufmann at the University of Buckingham, analyzed several datasets and found that, among university students, the share identifying as transgender fell from nearly 7% in 2023 to just under 4% in 2025. The number of students who identify as non-heterosexual also declined by roughly 10 percentage points in the same period — the first significant reversal since tracking began.</p><p id="">The steepest declines were seen among students identifying as queer, pansexual, asexual, or bisexual.</p><p id="">The trend appears generational as well: freshmen are now <em id="">less likely</em> than seniors to describe themselves as bisexual, trans, or queer — a striking shift from just a few years ago, when those numbers were climbing fast.</p><p id="">Elite schools are showing the most dramatic changes. At Phillips Academy Andover, transgender identification dropped from 9% to 3%, while Brown University saw a fall from 5% to 2.6%. Analysts suggest these declines at top-tier institutions may signal the start of a broader cultural correction. Non-binary identification has also been cut roughly in half since 2022.</p><p id="">When it comes to sexual orientation, bisexual identification peaked around 2022–23 before sliding downward. The “queer” and “other” categories surged through 2023, then collapsed by 2025. Gay and lesbian numbers remained stable at around 3–5%, while heterosexual identification has rebounded strongly, reaching between 77% and 82% this year.</p><h2 id="">The mental health connection</h2><p id="">The report also highlights a connection between gender identity and mental health. While transgender identification declined across all mental health categories, the drop was less pronounced among students reporting depression. In fact, the share of depressed students identifying as non-binary actually rose — from 10.8% in 2024 to 11.6% in 2025.&nbsp;</p><p id="">More than other factors, mental health is what appears to most affect the adoption of gender ideology.</p><p id="">“Trans, queer and bisexual identities are in rapid decline among young educated Americans,” Professor Kaufmann concluded in his report. “This does not appear to be the result of a shift to the right, the return of religion or a rejection of woke culture war attitudes. Despite high correlations between sexual/gender identity and political attitudes within individuals, the over-time trend in gender and sexuality seems relatively independent of political, cultural and religious beliefs. Improving mental health, however, appears to be part of the explanation for the decline of BTQ+ identification.”</p><p id="">‍</p>

New report reveals steep decline in transgenderism

‍Mental health appears to be correlated

<p id="">Western media outlets are swooning over Islamic terrorists being released by Israel in exchange for the 20 Israeli hostages captured by Hamas.</p><h2 id="">BBC: ‘Fathers, brothers and sons’ who are ‘national heroes’</h2><p id="">President Trump has received universal praise for brokering a 20-stage deal between Israel and Hamas. Among other things, the deal requires Hamas to release all Israeli hostages. In exchange, Israel agreed to release 1,700 Palestinian criminals and terrorists, in addition to 250 others who are serving life sentences.</p><p id="">Such terrorists include Murad Muhammad Ridha Ahmad Abu al-Rub, who was serving four life sentences for his part in a 2006 suicide bombing that killed four Israeli civilians in the town of Kedumim. When reporting on al-Rub’s release, the <em id="">BBC </em>portrayed him as a homecoming hero, failing to mention the bombing. <em id="">BBC </em>Middle East correspondent Lucy Williamson interviewed al-Rub’s tearful sister, Aida, who sobbed: “They kidnapped my brother.”&nbsp;</p><p id="">“Aida has waited 20 years for her brother Murad to be released from Israeli jail,” Williamson sympathized. “Dozens of prisoners emerged from Red Cross buses as fathers, brothers and sons - carried in as national heroes. But Murad wasn't among them,” she added.</p><p id="">The pro-Hamas outlet noted that al-Rub was serving four life sentences, but did not say what for.</p><p id="">Ahmed Mahmed Jameel Shahada is another Palestinian prisoner who is being released despite receiving a life sentence. In 1989, Shahada, who is originally from Gaza, raped and murdered a 13-year-old Israeli boy named Oren Baharami.</p><p id="">Israel has also released Ali al-Sayes, who is responsible for 10 bombings throughout Israel. One bombing blew up an Israeli school bus in 2003, killing seven children.</p><h2 id="">WaPo columnist: You can’t destroy Hamas, ‘nor should you’</h2><p id="">Media outlets like the <em id="">BBC </em>and <em id="">The Guardian </em>have refused to use the label “terrorists” for these prisoners, instead referring to them as “Palestinian detainees” and “fighters.”</p><p id="">They were joined by the <em id="">Washington Post</em> columnist Shadi Hamid, an Egyptian Muslim, who openly demanded Israel grant amnesty to “low-level” Hamas terrorists.</p><p id="">“How do you disarm Hamas – that is not quite clear how that’s to be worked out,” he told <em id="">CNN </em>anchor Brianna Keilar. “But also it’s good that in the 20-point plan there is a path for Hamas who commit to peaceful coexistence and give up their arms to get amnesty or to get safe passage out of Gaza, because at the end of the day, there are still going to be – there still will be a significant Hamas presence, so you can’t just pretend they don’t exist. And you can’t eradicate every single member of Hamas, nor should you, that would just be — that didn’t even happen, not that I like this comparison too much —”</p><p id="">Keilar stopped Hamid: “You say ‘nor should you.’ Your case for that is what?”</p><p id="">“I mean you can’t — you shouldn’t kill, like, low-level members of Hamas, people who were not implicated in October 7th,” Hamid explained, falsely claiming that October 7th was not carried out by thousands of Hamas terrorists and Gazans. “October 7th was done by a small group of senior military commanders — Israel should have the right to kill them, and has killed many of them if not most of them, right? So — but Hamas is a popular movement and there has to be some way to bring in the low-level members into the political process because you don’t want them to play spoiler.”</p><div data-rt-embed-type='true'><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">On CNN, Washington Post columnist Shadi Hamid says Israel &quot;shouldn&#39;t kill low-level members of Hamas, people who where not implicated in October 7&quot; because &quot;Hamas is a popular movement&quot; and must be integrated into the new Gaza government. <a href="https://t.co/27I823cqHN">pic.twitter.com/27I823cqHN</a></p>&mdash; Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) <a href="https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1977808584512844004?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 13, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><p id="">‍</p>

Western media swoon as Israel releases Islamic terrorists

Mass murderers, rapists are lionized as ‘fathers, brothers and sons’ who are ‘national heroes’

<p id="">By Dr. Eyal Shahar, Brownstone Institute</p><p id="">In the years that I served as an associate editor (for <em id="">The American Journal of Epidemiology</em>), I have seen the entire spectrum of “peer reviews” — from meticulous, thoughtful critiques whose authors evidently invested several hours in the task to sketchy reviews that reflected carelessness and incompetence. I have read friendly reviews by admirers of the authors and hostile reviews by their enemies. (It is not difficult to tell from the tone.) In the practice of science, human beings still behave like human beings.</p><p id="">Matters got worse during the pandemic. Studies that praised the Covid vaccines were quickly certified “peer-reviewed,” whereas critical, post-publication peer review was <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/the-censorship-of-covid-science-three-examples/" target="_blank" id="">suppressed</a>. As a result, we now have a historical collection of published poor science. It cannot be erased, but it is time to start correcting the record.</p><p id="">Biomedical journals are not the platform. First, there is no formal section for open peer reviews of articles that were published long ago. Second, editors have no interest in exposing falsehoods that were published in their journals. Third, the <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/long-post-vaccination-censorship/" target="_blank" id="">censorship</a> machine is still in place. So far, I was able to break it only <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12449847/" target="_blank" id="">once</a>, and it wasn’t easy.</p><p id="">So, how can we try to correct the record, and where?</p><p id="">Let me make a suggestion to my colleagues in epidemiology, biostatistics, and related methodological fields who preserved their critical thinking during the pandemic. Choose one article or more about the Covid vaccines and submit your peer review to <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles" target="_blank" id="">Brownstone Journal</a>. If it is interesting and well-written, there is a good chance it will be posted. I advise cherry-picking: find those peer-reviewed articles that irritated you most, either because they were pure <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/lies-damn-lies-and-causality/" target="_blank" id="">nonsense</a> or because the correct inference was <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/how-highly-effective-vaccine-turns-into-mediocre-vaccine-or-worse/" target="_blank" id="">strikingly different</a>. And if you posted short critiques on Twitter (now X) or thorough reviews on other platforms, expand, revise, and submit them to Brownstone. Perhaps we can slowly create an inventory of critical reviews, restoring some trust in the scientific method and in biomedical science.</p><p id="">Here is an example.</p><h3 id="">A Review and a Re-Analysis of a Study in Ontario, Canada</h3><p id="">Published in the <em id="">British Medical Journal</em> in August 2021, the <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8377789/" target="_blank" id="">paper</a> reported the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines in early 2021, shortly after their authorization.</p><p id="">This research was typical of vaccine studies from that time. Effectiveness was estimated in a “real-world” setting; namely, an observational study during a vaccination campaign. The study period (mid-December 2020 through mid-April 2021) included the peak of a Covid winter wave in early January. We’ll discuss later a strong bias called confounding by background infection risk.</p><p id="">The design was a variation of the case-control study, the test-negative design. Eligible subjects underwent a PCR test because of Covid-like symptoms. Cases tested positive; controls tested negative. As usual, odds ratios were computed, and effectiveness was computed as 1 minus the odds ratio (expressed in percent). The sample size was large: 53,270 cases and 270,763 controls.</p><figure id="" class="w-richtext-figure-type-image " data-rt-type="image" data-rt-align=""><div id=""><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66450044188dfe741d77c31e/68ecb1165eace4daf9db8760_image-2-800x363.png" alt="" width="auto" height="auto" loading="auto" id=""></div><figcaption id="">Source: part of figure 1 in the article</figcaption></figure><p id="">The authors reported the following key results (my italics):</p><blockquote id=""><em id="">“Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection observed ≥14 days after one dose was 60% (95% confidence interval 57% to 64%), increasing from 48% (41% to 54%) at 14–20 days after one dose to 71% (63% to 78%) at 35–41 days. Vaccine effectiveness observed ≥7 days after two doses was 91% (89% to 93%).”</em></blockquote><p id="">Like almost every study of effectiveness, the authors discarded early events. As explained <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12449847/" target="_blank" id="">elsewhere</a>, this practice introduces a bias called <a href="https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/167/4/492/233064?redirectedFrom=fulltext" target="_blank" id="">immortal time</a>, or <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.13839" target="_blank" id="">case-counting window bias</a>. Not only does it obscure possible early harmful effects, but it also effectively leads to overestimation of effectiveness. RFK, Jr. alluded to this bias in non-technical terms (see <a href="https://x.com/i/status/1962442350644568123" target="_blank" id="">video clip</a>).</p><p id="">The <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12449847/" target="_blank" id="">correct approach</a> is simple. We should estimate effectiveness <em id="">from the administration of the first dose</em> to later timepoints (built-up immunity). My table below shows the study data and the results of the new analysis. Each row shows the computation of effectiveness <em id="">by the indicated day</em>.</p><figure id="" class="w-richtext-figure-type-image " data-rt-type="image" data-rt-align=""><div id=""><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66450044188dfe741d77c31e/68ecb1165eace4daf9db875d_image-3-800x237.png" alt="" width="auto" height="auto" loading="auto" id=""></div></figure><p id="">Effectiveness was negative by the end of the first two weeks after the first dose and had reached about 30% before a second dose, not 70%. It has reached only about 50% by the time of full immunity, not 90%. Although my estimates are unadjusted, eTable 2 (<a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8377789/#notes1" target="_blank" id="">supplementary material</a>) indicates that adjustment has hardly changed the authors’ estimates.</p><p id="">My results are still biased, however, by what I called earlier “confounding by background infection risk.”</p><p id="">The figure below was taken from the website of <a href="https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/Data-and-Analysis/Infectious-Disease/COVID-19-Data-Surveillance/Archives/Daily-Epi-Summary" target="_blank" id="">Public Health Ontario</a>. The black line shows the 7-day rolling average of new cases. I added red lines that show the study period, divided into two intervals. I also added estimates of the number of vaccinated people in each interval.</p><figure id="" class="w-richtext-figure-type-image " data-rt-type="image" data-rt-align=""><div id=""><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66450044188dfe741d77c31e/68ecb1165eace4daf9db8757_image-4-800x427.avif" alt="" width="auto" height="auto" loading="auto" id=""></div></figure><p id="">The first interval, which contained the peak of the winter wave, was a period of slow beginning of the vaccination campaign. At that time, the distribution of vaccination status was skewed toward non-vaccination, which means that <em id="">non-vaccination status happened to coincide with a high probability of getting infected</em>. In contrast, the background infection rate was lower in much of the second period, when several million people received the first dose. Only in mid-March did the number of new cases cross back the dashed line. In short, the inverse association between vaccination and infection was heavily confounded by time trends in the risk of an infection. Even a placebo injection would have appeared effective.</p><p id="">I cannot remove the bias, and it is strong. The true effectiveness, if any, is much smaller than the estimates I computed after the removal of immortal time bias. Whether it is 10% by six weeks or 20% makes no difference. That’s not a vaccine.</p><p id="">The authors used another case group: hospitalization or death. This data is subject not only to the previous biases but also to the <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/illusions-in-vaccine-effectiveness/" target="_blank" id="">healthy vaccinee bias</a>. I cannot offer a correction, however. Most of the data for cases was suppressed due to small numbers, and the control group was wrong. They used “the same control group as for the first primary outcome analysis (ie, individuals with symptoms who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2).” That’s a violation of a basic principle of the test-negative design. Controls should have been hospitalized or deceased people who tested negative.</p><p id="">The following sentence reflects a misunderstanding of the regression model they fit. They write, “We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratio, comparing <em id="">the odds of vaccination</em> (my italics) between test positive cases and test negative controls (with unvaccinated people as reference group).” The dependent variable was case-control status (log odds of being a case). Technically, the odds of being a case (versus being a control) are compared, not the odds of vaccination.</p><p id="">Strangely, the posted <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8377789/#notes1" target="_blank" id="">supplemental material</a> still carries the heading “CONFIDENTIAL — NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, 5 AUG 2021.” Only in the Covid era can you find such sloppiness. We observe here biased (careless) handling of a paper that served the narrative.</p><p id="">I will end my review with a favorite topic of mine: <a href="https://shahar-26393.medium.com/the-australian-government-analyzed-covid-vaccines-discard-the-results-4d7f7e61cd40" id="">nonsensical results</a>.</p><p id="">The figure below displays estimates of effectiveness, as computed by the authors. The arrow points to a result that makes no sense. We do not expect any incremental benefit of the second dose within 6 days of the injection, yet effectiveness increased, almost reaching the estimate for the subsequent interval (7+ days). If the estimate for 0–6 days is clearly biased, why would we trust the next one?</p><figure id="" class="w-richtext-figure-type-image " data-rt-type="image" data-rt-align=""><div id=""><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66450044188dfe741d77c31e/68ecb1165eace4daf9db875a_image-5-800x483.avif" alt="" width="auto" height="auto" loading="auto" id=""></div><figcaption id="">Source: Figure 2 in the article</figcaption></figure><h3 id="">Epilogue</h3><p id="">As I wrote at the beginning, we should try to correct the historical record. It’s a long road ahead, but as the proverb says, “A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” I am particularly appealing to top-ranked methodologists who used to tear apart poor studies and criticize shaky methods. Most of them kept silent throughout the pandemic, probably fearing the consequences of challenging the “safe and effective” narrative.</p><p id="">Let’s start reading fearless reviews of studies that reported the remarkable effectiveness of Covid vaccines, which proved to be false. There is no shortage of problems to detect, highlight, and correct, if possible, with actual data or simulations:</p><figure id="" class="w-richtext-figure-type-image " data-rt-type="image" data-rt-align=""><div id=""><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66450044188dfe741d77c31e/68ecb1165eace4daf9db8750_image-6.avif" alt="" width="auto" height="auto" loading="auto" id=""></div></figure><p id="">If we don’t do this work, we will continue to read <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2836434" target="_blank" id="">false, effectiveness-based estimates</a> of lives saved. Was it close to <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2836434" target="_blank" id="">2.5 million</a>, as some have claimed, or <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/thousands-of-averted-covid-deaths-in-israel-science-fiction/" target="_blank" id="">undetectable in mortality statistics</a>, or <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/the-mirror-of-erised-the-true-efficacy-of-covid-vaccines/" target="_blank" id="">possibly about zero</a>? And will we ever get some answers from <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/please-show-us-the-trials/" target="_blank" id="">relevant trials</a>?</p><p id=""><a href="https://brownstone.org/author/eyal-shahar/" id="">Eyal Shahar</a></p><p id="">Dr. Eyal Shahar is a professor emeritus of public health in epidemiology and biostatistics. His research focuses on epidemiology and methodology. In recent years, Dr. Shahar has also made significant contributions to research methodology, especially in the domain of causal diagrams and biases.</p><p id=""><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" id="">Published under a</a><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" id=""> Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>. For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the <a href="https://brownstone.org/articles/a-call-for-peer-re-reviews-of-articles-on-covid-vaccines/" id="">previous Brownstone Institute Article </a>and <a href="https://brownstone.org/author/eyal-shahar/">Author</a>. Originally published at <a href="https://shahar-26393.medium.com/a-call-for-peer-re-reviews-of-articles-on-covid-vaccines-1f82fd3ff23a" id="">Medium.</a></p>

Protecting your
Medical Freedom
and Civil Liberties

Stream What is a Doctor? Today!

The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - A Good Doctor Speaks with Dr. Gold

Latest Work

Violent Leftist who assaulted US officials avoids jail time

New report reveals steep decline in transgenderism

Western media swoon as Israel releases Islamic terrorists

A Call for Peer Re-Reviews of Articles on Covid Vaccines

Latest Videos

How Much IsYour Freedom Worth?