Irvine, CA – Four healthy naturally immune female college students have teamed up with America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) to bring a science-based challenge in federal court to their school’s vaccine mandate. The Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint on Thursday, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. This important case is against … [AFLDS FILED A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Read More »](https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/press_releases/aflds-filed-a-complaint-against-the-university-of-california/)
Irvine, CA – Four healthy naturally immune female college students have teamed up with America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) to bring a science-based challenge in federal court to their school’s vaccine mandate. The Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint on Thursday, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. This important case is against the University of California (UC), one of the largest and most influential public college systems in the world. Filed on July 26, 2021, the case is currently progressing through pre-trial motions, together with an appeal currently before the U.S. Supreme Court. AFLDS is requesting the U.S. Supreme Court intervene immediately to order the trial judge to apply the correct legal standard of strict scrutiny. If successful, this would shift the burden to the government to produce a compelling reason why the government is mandating corporate biotechnology gene therapy injections (Covid-19 vaccines) into these healthy naturally immune students. AFLDS continually reviews new documents relevant to the case, including a powerful letter signed by prominent deans of the college urging the college President to forego his rush to mandate vaccines. The Plaintiffs go further, citing recent data in support of their allegation that “mandatory vaccination is a failed public health policy [and] natural immunity is a successful public health strategy that is currently working in many other countries, and in many communities within the United States.” The Amended Complaint alleges “the Defendants are unconstitutionally coercing and segregating Plaintiffs without scientific justification because Plaintiffs are exercising their constitutional, and statutory, rights to decline involuntary injection of harmful experimental drugs.” Another important aspect of the case applies to religious exemptions to vaccination. Attorney Greg Glaser, who filed the Amendment explains: “The University has laid the foundation for a bait-and-switch in 2021-22, with religious exemptions, as the college is presently offering some students a religious exemption which the college plans to unilaterally remove after it has forced students with exemptions to submit multiple Covid-19 test results. By generating false positive test results, using high cycle PCR, Defendants create an illusion of ongoing risk to prop up their ongoing separate but equal policies.” The Amended Complaint emphasizes that natural immunity is scientifically superior to Covid-19 vaccines. The Amended Complaint alleges that “[p]eople with prior COVID-19 illness appear to experience significantly increased incidence and severity of side effects after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.” The harms include increased side effects such as: “blood clots, hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, heart attack, and strokes; reproductive issues, including menstrual irregularities, reduced fertility, miscarriages; transmission of spike protein from vaccinated individuals, such as through breast milk and associated risk in neonates and infants; neurological disorders, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’sPalsy, transverse myelitis and unspecified neurologic damage.” AFLDS’s Amended Complaint claims that what we’re seeing is a “pandemic of the vaccinated.”
Donations raised will support our efforts to educate the American public and political leaders.