AFLDS suit seeks to immediately revoke emergency COVID vaccine use based on disturbing new mortality data

AFLDS suit seeks to immediately revoke emergency COVID vaccine use based on disturbing new mortality data

Download PDF

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) yesterday filed a motion seeking immediate injunctive relief in Alabama Federal District Court to stop Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the experimental COVID-19 injections for three groups of Americans.

A knowledgeable AFLDS source inside the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) stated that deaths occurring within 72 hours of COVID-19 shot injection are significantly underreported in the publicly-available VAERS database maintained by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA). “This is shocking,” the source said, “and informed consent, which is required under the law, is impossible when safety data is so misleading.” As of July 9th, reported deaths in VAERS totaled 10,991. Of those, 4,593 were within 72 hours of vaccination. The CDC source has provided a sworn statement that the actual number of deaths are conservatively five times higher, meaning that as of publication, we are approaching at least 55,000 vaccine-related deaths.

The AFLDS law suit seeks to immediately stop any further use of the experimental COVID vaccines for the following three groups:

Group (1): Young people 18 years of age and under. Children are at statistically 0% risk of death from COVID-19. By contrast, expert studies show that the number killed by the vaccines is well into the tens of thousands, and those injured is well into the hundreds of thousands. AFLDS Communications Director Dr. Teryn Clarke said: “Children are one-third of our population and all of our future. Children are never the experiment.”

Group (2): All those who have already recovered from COVID-19. Natural immunity is superior to manufactured immunity. In addition, the vaccines can trigger a dangerous and deadly hyper-immune response in people with immunity.

Group (3): Every other American who has not yet received informed consent, as defined by Federal law. It is unlawful, and unconstitutional, to administer experimental agents to individuals who cannot make an informed decision as to the true benefits and risks of the vaccines. They must be of an age or capacity to make informed decisions, and they must be provided with all of the risk/benefit information necessary to make an informed decision.

One of the named plaintiffs, Deborah Sobczak, the mother of a 15- and 17-year-old, said: “My child will not be the subject of an experiment. What kind of monsters are we allowing to control us? Perfectly healthy children have developed heart inflammation, brain bleeding, and even died! I have had enough. I am not sacrificing my child so a pharmaceutical company can experiment on her. This madness has to stop.”

AFLDS Legal Director Ali Shultz, JD, said: “Preserving Americans’ God-given and constitutionally-protected freedoms, including a doctor’s free speech ability to provide honest information to a patient, so the patient (or minor patient’s parents) can decide whether to freely consent, is AFLDS’ mission.”

Scroll to Top

Sharing a story can change the world.